📌 🧵 /sfg/ - spaceflight general
Anonymous at Sat, 11 Jan 2025 23:54:03 UTC No. 16543091
soon™
Previous >>16539884
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 00:01:33 UTC No. 16543099
>>16543091
Glass the Earth, demigod war eventually
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 00:01:46 UTC No. 16543100
2 more weeks
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 00:08:10 UTC No. 16543106
>>16543091
looks like we have a clean separation and good ignition. you're well on your way now
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 00:13:26 UTC No. 16543109
>>16543104
I hope it does, elon needs a pop in the nose to make him focus on this instead of tweeting about europe. jeff deserves a win too, and I like his ideas on space habitats over toxic dustballs.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 00:26:43 UTC No. 16543120
>>16543109
lol, what pop in the nose? At this point almost every company, besides Blue Origin, has reached orbit.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 00:28:13 UTC No. 16543122
>>16543120
at least BOner has a real rocket instead of a plastic toy like RL
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 00:30:19 UTC No. 16543124
>>16543104
You can always tell how desperate the EDS crowd is when they never mention Starship's soft landings, let alone the first stage catch, as though circularizing your orbit is the most technically challenging part of rocketry.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 00:33:46 UTC No. 16543128
>>16543124
its such a very silly line of complaint. wonder what the next silly line will be.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 00:38:29 UTC No. 16543131
>>16543126
chode rocket
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 00:40:09 UTC No. 16543133
>>16543128
I already have it lined up: starship will only be used for starlink / starship will never go to mars.
after those fall through I'm going to lean really hard on how "ambitious" the million people on mars by 2050 timeline is.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 00:41:10 UTC No. 16543136
>>16543132
if he was really a transporter he'd never tell anyone anything
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 00:42:49 UTC No. 16543137
>>16543133
i just treat them all as trolls and entertainment at this point. once social media tells them to get angry about someone or something else they will simply melt away vanish while the rocket carries on regardless.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 00:43:07 UTC No. 16543138
why is this thread always the most popular thread here
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 00:46:04 UTC No. 16543140
>>16543138
its the high quality of posts and their uniformly penetrating level of knowledge and insight.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 00:48:05 UTC No. 16543141
>>16543138
/sci/ stands for Space and Cosmos Institution.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 00:48:07 UTC No. 16543142
>>16543138
It's a topic where stuff actually happens.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 00:53:36 UTC No. 16543145
>>16543144
tiles are still a temporary solution
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 00:55:36 UTC No. 16543146
>>16543138
/sfg/ is the only worthwhile thing on this board.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 00:55:54 UTC No. 16543147
>>16543138
/sci/ stands for /sfg/ cand ifriends
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 00:57:37 UTC No. 16543148
>>16543145
"Temporary" could mean many years. We see that they work, but the reusability part is still the unknown. On the other hand, they have yet to test the active cooling and if it succeeds, it's going to take a lot of time for them to change the design and put it into production.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 00:59:24 UTC No. 16543151
ablative crew members
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 01:03:16 UTC No. 16543155
>>16543144
Qué lindo perrito, ¿no tenía Elon uno así?
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 01:04:24 UTC No. 16543157
I really wish Musk would focus on his space thing instead of making a laughingstock of himself in video games or politics. I'm all for Starship on Mars but holy fuck the PoE2 thing is just pathetic.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 01:10:56 UTC No. 16543165
>>16543157
I agree, but the being salty about video games thing just tells me you're bad at them. If you were among the best in the world at anything, you'd understand where he's coming from.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 01:11:08 UTC No. 16543166
>>16543157
You're right, I need to get back to Grandia tonight.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 01:11:47 UTC No. 16543167
>>16543157
asbergers flare up in old age or something
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 01:13:26 UTC No. 16543170
>>16543167
The problem is it makes literally all his claims ever questionable.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 01:13:29 UTC No. 16543171
Why is Elon such a retard
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 01:14:31 UTC No. 16543173
>>16543157
Without his narcissism, insecurity, and need for validation and attention, he probably wouldn't be doing the space stuff either. So you gotta take the good with the bad
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 01:24:34 UTC No. 16543181
>>16543144
>a single lost tile means the death of Starship
or
>HLS requires 17 refuelings
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 01:26:05 UTC No. 16543183
>>16543157
>the PoE2 thing
What is the issue with Elon play Path of Exile 2, is the playerbase seething at him outperforming them?
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 01:27:19 UTC No. 16543184
>>16543183
no the player base laughing their asses off at his attempt to hide the fact he paid Ching Chong Boosting Co. to boost his account and that he doesn't know how to do anything at all in the game
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 01:28:53 UTC No. 16543185
>>16543183
No he undeniably fucked up and showed on stream that he knows nothing about the game where he's supposedly one of the top players. Making all his previous claims probably bullshit too.
Just search it on youtube.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 01:31:44 UTC No. 16543189
>>16543138
We have the best memes
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 01:31:44 UTC No. 16543190
>>16543184
The best part is it also makes his Diablo crap 100% bullshit since games are so similar. He was lying the entire time.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 01:35:41 UTC No. 16543197
For those interested the roster poll is up >>16543187
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 01:42:24 UTC No. 16543202
>>16543190
I wonder if he even beat Deus Ex, one of his favorite games, without being scummy
>like me lol I just max the pistol and run speed and hop around shooting everything
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 01:57:09 UTC No. 16543217
sfg - Smearing Felon's Gaming
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 01:58:48 UTC No. 16543220
>>16543218
I fuck with starbase’s future-utilitarian vibe
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 01:58:53 UTC No. 16543221
>>16543157
Elon Musk is taking exactly every correct action to get us to Mars. The fact that you don't think a superintelligence's actions are logically are completely irrelevant. Everything he has done, however illogical, nonsensical, or even stupid, are perfectly executed for the sole purpose of making humanity multiplanetary. He has never made a wrong move. Your world model is incapable of comprehending
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 02:00:22 UTC No. 16543223
>>16543202
ok but bunnyhopping around with the dragon tooth sword is fun even if it's OP
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 02:00:40 UTC No. 16543224
>>16543197
based
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 02:04:42 UTC No. 16543226
Musk is no Bob Page
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 02:07:43 UTC No. 16543229
reminder there are people in space every day and nobody cares
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 02:09:28 UTC No. 16543231
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 02:09:58 UTC No. 16543233
>>16543229
Normies dont care but normies also don’t know much.
Anyone who knows even a little bit about the ISS and how it has been continuously manned cares about the ISS being decommissioned and whether or not that record will stand. Tiangong isn’t permanently crewed so if ISS dies without a replacement and China / Russia haven’t gotten to permanent presence in space yet, that record will end. And people care about that, I think
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 02:12:03 UTC No. 16543235
>>16543221
Elon shut up and focus on the rockets.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 02:13:04 UTC No. 16543236
>>16543229
There are people and space stations in space for decades. Why would anyone still care?
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 02:13:19 UTC No. 16543237
>>16543229
I think about it often, and I think it's pretty neat.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 02:17:20 UTC No. 16543239
https://x.com/Digantarahq/status/18
>Captured at 6:17 AM IST: SpaDeX-A & SpaDeX-B have merged into a single blurb on our sensors! Thrilling moments ahead as we anticipate the docking in a few minutes!!
https://x.com/isro/status/187824278
>SpaDeX satellites holding position at 15m, capturing stunning photos and videos of each other!
https://x.com/isro/status/187825458
>A trial attempt to reach up to 15 m and further to 3 m is done. Moving back spacecrafts to safe distance. The docking process will be done after analysing data further. Stay tuned for updates.
https://x.com/Astro_Neel/status/187
>Certainly not today. And depending upon the overhead passes and its overlap with the ground stations, it could be anywhere from a few days to a few weeks from now.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 02:48:59 UTC No. 16543257
For the first couple dozen F9 landing attempts, spacex made it clear in their webcasts and website that it was an 'attempt' and might not work. Doesn't seem like BO is saying that? they're confident?
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 03:05:25 UTC No. 16543261
>>16543259
yeah basically, it would be fucking hilarious
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 03:08:19 UTC No. 16543265
>>16543257
they're more confident than spacex was on their first attempt because nobody knew if what spacex were attempting was even possible or what difficulties might be encountered. BO have the advantage of years of demonstrations and some of the failure modes that can be encountered (plus being able to pluck some vets from spacex who worked on falcon)
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 03:10:11 UTC No. 16543267
>>16543259
Nah I want all of them to succeed. China and EU too. The more competition the better.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 03:19:55 UTC No. 16543278
>new scott
>no one posts link
It's sad being the last space flight enjoyer left
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 03:24:10 UTC No. 16543283
>>16543220
Pure engineering. God's laws given form. Beautiful in the same way nature is.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 03:26:38 UTC No. 16543289
FLT 7 delayed to Wednesday
https://www.spacex.com/launches/mis
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 03:27:43 UTC No. 16543291
>>16543289
ENOUGH
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 03:28:24 UTC No. 16543292
>>16543233
>the ISS is being decommissioned?
>there's people on the ISS all the time?
>China has a space station???
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 03:28:25 UTC No. 16543293
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 03:28:35 UTC No. 16543294
>>16543278
then post it. I havent seen a new scott unless you mean his last december recap
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 03:28:43 UTC No. 16543295
>>16543289
Reminder that the weather's shit in the middle of next week and this will probably end up NET Friday.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 03:30:25 UTC No. 16543297
>>16543289
At this point it's a competition between Nuglin and Starshit to see which one gets delayed the most...
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 03:31:02 UTC No. 16543298
>>16543267
>The more competition the better
>The thinner the margins and the less capital available for innovation the better
Huh?
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 03:36:23 UTC No. 16543306
>>16543267
I don't care if US wins.
I just need China, Russia and Europe to lose.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 03:38:59 UTC No. 16543309
>>16543267
>The more competition the better.
reddit moment
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 03:39:50 UTC No. 16543310
>>16543296
Thunderchads... we won
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 03:41:16 UTC No. 16543313
>>16543219
over...
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 03:48:46 UTC No. 16543315
>>16543296
watch out how after new glenn flies, he's not gonna upload one single video about blue origin. no sir, just more spacex and musk deboonking. 100% guaranteed.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 03:54:36 UTC No. 16543320
>>16543315
if NG is a success and they stick the landing, he'll make a video about how this will change the industry and kill off potential commercial starship launches
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 03:55:39 UTC No. 16543324
>>16543296
everyone hates musk because of his h1b faggotry
expect the spacex workers to start engaging in sabotage since they know they're going to be replaced with jeets soon anyway
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 03:58:12 UTC No. 16543326
>>16543324
>h1b faggotry
The what?
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 04:12:49 UTC No. 16543335
>>16543259
If it succeeds, good.
If it explodes, lmao
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 04:15:22 UTC No. 16543337
>>16543289
>inb4 Now targeting Monday, January 20 for the seventh test flight of Starship
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 04:17:48 UTC No. 16543339
>>16543291
ketamine psychosis
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 04:25:57 UTC No. 16543345
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/18782
>There will probably be another 10m added to the Starship stack before we increase diameter
that's less than the additional length of starship v3 over v2. 15m+ diameter starships in our lifetime
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 04:28:26 UTC No. 16543349
>>16543345
relax elon
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 04:41:11 UTC No. 16543357
>>16543345
Any Elon-esque translator here? When he talks about increasing the diameter, do you think he means that as if he's talking about the next immediate step to follow after lengthening the rocket, i.e. Starship v4, or more like just future plans and vague ideas, similar to that time when he mentioned the possibility of 18m-wide Starships?
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 04:42:21 UTC No. 16543359
>>16543124
you can't expect too much
being anti-Starship means being delusional and retarded
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 04:44:01 UTC No. 16543360
>>16543138
we have slightly fewer retards and schizos than all the other threads (only 99.6%)
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 04:44:28 UTC No. 16543362
>>16543357
They can't do an 18m wide ship with the current over-the-road setup they have. They'll either need a direct line from factory to tower with no roads or start using barges.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 04:48:13 UTC No. 16543363
>>16543157
I think it's clear that Elon is sufficiently productive and doesn't need encouragement in that regard from cartoon-attracted persons who have never seen a vagina.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 04:55:32 UTC No. 16543366
>>16543244
add a red mark at the point in the mission where new glenn explodes (multiple marks if you think there will be more than one)
whoever gets closest is the winner
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 04:55:54 UTC No. 16543367
>>16543362
>over-the-road setup
Surely that's quite a trivial thing to solve, literally just put more pavement and make the road wider, this would an easy task for SpaceX, the company that is trying to colonize fucking Mars.
>inb4 it's not that easy in road-ry
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 05:04:18 UTC No. 16543373
>>16543363
He's the kind of person that will take millions of people laughing at him on youtube very seriously LOL.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 05:06:13 UTC No. 16543376
>>16543345
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/18776
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 05:07:32 UTC No. 16543377
>>16543376
you dont get to space cruise liners without large destinations waiting for them first. build the colony. the cruise liners will follow.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 05:08:05 UTC No. 16543379
>>16543367
muh easement
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 05:08:12 UTC No. 16543381
>>16543377
You can't ignore my girth (18m)
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 05:10:41 UTC No. 16543384
>>16543376
He's getting dangerously redpilled on fatter starship.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 05:11:15 UTC No. 16543386
>>16543377
90% of tourists won't want to leave LEO because all other transit times are too long.
9% of the remainder will be okay with doing a lunar flyby.
The last 1% are psychopaths and would be better off being hired as long-haul employees.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 05:12:52 UTC No. 16543389
>>16543386
>average cruise duration is 1-2 weeks
i thought people spend longer on them, but i guess not. leo or lunar flyby it is...
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 05:14:13 UTC No. 16543391
where Body Odour stream
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 05:15:04 UTC No. 16543392
>>16543391
fucking delayed
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 05:16:22 UTC No. 16543397
>>16543392
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 05:16:23 UTC No. 16543398
save us rocketlab
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 05:18:36 UTC No. 16543403
>>16543184
The playerbase can't handle Elon outperforming them and is accusing him of pay to win?
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 05:20:04 UTC No. 16543404
>>16543403
No dude he is quite literally using chink slaves to farm his account and play for him while he comments on stream. It's so cringe.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 05:21:30 UTC No. 16543407
>>16543399
>80m wide
>1000 tons
hockey puck penis
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 05:25:15 UTC No. 16543409
>>16543403
Elon just stop this is pathetic to the max.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 05:26:19 UTC No. 16543410
>>16543362
>They can't do an 18m wide ship with the current over-the-road setup they have.
But they could do 12m tanks with the existing 9m engine section on Super Heavy and continue using their existing infrastructure.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 05:26:23 UTC No. 16543411
>>16543396
They can make the rocket wider, but they can't make the propellant tanks taller.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 05:29:19 UTC No. 16543412
>>16543362
there are documents out there submitted by spacex to cameron county/the FAA stating they would be willing to at least partially fund a widening of highway 4 an additional two lanes. Also, it's likely that by the time a starship v4 is in testing, the majority of construction and launching is done from Florida for operational vehicles simply due to land requirements to have all the factories and launchpads required to sustain 100+ starship flights a year
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 05:29:38 UTC No. 16543413
>>16543396
>>16543399
>chonky starship scrubs seconds before launch
>entire world runs out of methane and lox
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 05:30:17 UTC No. 16543415
>>16543404
Retard couldn't even check fucking wiki or something before the stream so he at least knows the basics.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 05:35:23 UTC No. 16543418
>>16543412
Fuck Florida, Elon should stick to launch solely from Boca Chica, where he owns the whole facility and isn't subject to any whims from politici*ns or oldspace. He only has to fill the fuck out of those wetlands and there, thousands upon thousands of more square meters ready to use.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 05:38:57 UTC No. 16543425
>>16543138
The question is why is this thread always surrounded by garbage
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 05:42:07 UTC No. 16543428
>>16543425
it used to be really good before it was a general, then got really bad after the elections, then got extra super duper bad after starship launch 5, then died when elon went on his christmas ketamine binge pajeet shilling rampage
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 05:50:02 UTC No. 16543439
>>16543418
with how cozy spacex are getting with space force (see USSF overturning the coastal commission's decision to not approve additional launches from vandenberg), additional launches from the cape should be pushed through pretty easily as long as starshield sats and national security assets are put up on starship
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 06:01:27 UTC No. 16543446
>>16543399
save me a click, is it clickbait?
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 06:19:09 UTC No. 16543452
>>16543411
why not
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 06:20:32 UTC No. 16543453
>>16543410
hey anon I'm not letting you off the hook for this one this idea is retarded.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 06:35:09 UTC No. 16543458
>>16543247
>New Shepard remains suborbital
Doesn't that defeat the point of launching it on New Glenn?
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 06:35:18 UTC No. 16543459
>>16543446
>bot channel thumbnail
What do you think?
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 06:39:02 UTC No. 16543460
>>16543453
Why do you think a rebated engine section is a bad idea? I can see aerodynamics being an issue.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 06:47:39 UTC No. 16543465
>>16543452
Each Raptor can only lift so much mass above it, and you can only pack the Raptors so tightly. With common fuels between all stages and a target payload capacity, this sets the upper bound for how tall the fuel stack above the first stage can be.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 06:54:42 UTC No. 16543470
We USED to think big
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Unq
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 07:10:05 UTC No. 16543481
>>16543470
the last one of those thats even realistic is boeings 1976 space freighter which is basically starship.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 07:14:26 UTC No. 16543483
>>16543481
Yeah but it's over 400t to orbit and it would have existed in the 80s. Also sea dragon is the biggest realistic rocket
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 07:25:26 UTC No. 16543485
>>16543289
Fuckin kill me now PLEASE
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 07:28:13 UTC No. 16543487
>>16543339
Is that a thing? i think i had a mushroom psychosis but didnt hit hard till months after the trip
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 07:35:55 UTC No. 16543491
>>16543407
Say that again 8 times fast
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 08:12:14 UTC No. 16543505
>>16543259
Booster reentry is the most likely point of failure.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 08:14:15 UTC No. 16543508
>>16543428
It's literally
>EDS sufferers cant stop seething and malding
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 08:16:32 UTC No. 16543511
even his biographer is now saying he's cooked. and Isaacson typically has been on the musk side of matters.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 08:25:16 UTC No. 16543515
>>16543508
fuck off newfag
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 08:25:57 UTC No. 16543516
>>16543366
For me, its
>Booster slams into the ocean after losing control
>Second stage performs flawlessly on stream. Then in the coming hours info starts to trickle out of some problem, some underperformance and lower orbit, a leak, payload doesn't separate etc
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 08:29:31 UTC No. 16543518
>>16543487
Yeah. A Google Deepmind guy recently killed himself because of Ketamine psychosis.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 08:43:00 UTC No. 16543524
>>16543518
no one mentions this ketamine run-in except his fucking suicide note. and that he thought ketamine was safer than psilocybin? retarded. pisses me off ketamine and mdma are getting early approvals over shrooms, though i wouldnt recomend to anyone except as a last resort
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 08:43:04 UTC No. 16543525
>>16543157
I spent 40 hours playing balatro just this week
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 08:49:48 UTC No. 16543530
https://x.com/ShanaDiez/status/1877
>Flight 7 full tanking test (wet dress rehearsal) complete tonight. Lots learned and lots of data to work through this weekend. But only a few things left before flight test. Starship V2 wants to fly!
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 09:02:37 UTC No. 16543534
>>16543508
this
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 09:39:41 UTC No. 16543546
>>16543091
One day, there will be a city on the Falkland islands
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 10:18:13 UTC No. 16543560
>>16543544
>Average American Woman
I just realised Blue doesn't really have a 'mascot'. SpaceX can compare against Starman. I think Rocket Lab used Peter Beck once
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 10:27:30 UTC No. 16543562
>>16543560
They should use Bezos' boglina wife
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 10:32:31 UTC No. 16543567
FORTNITE BATTLEPASS
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 10:33:05 UTC No. 16543570
>>16543557
>teeheehee, I'm so quirky and random.
>Please mistake my sociopathic behavior for autism!
Does anyone still buy this pathetic act?
>>16543560
Maybe BOo from Blue's Clues?
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 10:35:12 UTC No. 16543572
>>16543557
Elon is so based and quirky lol
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 10:35:47 UTC No. 16543573
>>16543570
you are deranged (Elon Deranged to be exact)
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 11:18:49 UTC No. 16543585
>>16543091
i just woke up!! i am so excited to watch the polaris dawn mission today!
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 11:29:53 UTC No. 16543589
>>16543516
Seems reasonable. I would say 50% it gets to orbit, and 10% first stage lands intact (and that's only because they probably hired a shitload of ex-SpaceXer that already did it)
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 11:31:55 UTC No. 16543590
>>16543585
Um, what?
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 11:37:11 UTC No. 16543593
>>16543292
>the shuttle is still going to the moon, right?
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 11:40:10 UTC No. 16543596
>>16543360
there's a reason moot named it /sci/, because you can't spell schizo without sci
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 11:42:42 UTC No. 16543599
>>16543516
I would be surprised if they mess it up desu they got a LOT of help with the deep throttling of BE-4 from AFRL. Of course there's a million things that *can* potentially go wrong but they have the hardest part solved.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 11:42:51 UTC No. 16543600
>>16543324
SpaceX? Doubtful. Tesla? Quite possible.
>>16543418
Why is this one not on the same axis?
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 11:45:46 UTC No. 16543601
>>16543465
ergo you get big chungus
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 11:50:45 UTC No. 16543602
>>16543366
I'm just gonna say second stage decides it doesn't want to fly upward, no explosion. (aside from FTS or ocean intercept)
Not going to stay up for it though, I'll catch the rewind in the morning before I leave for work.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 12:02:47 UTC No. 16543603
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 12:14:13 UTC No. 16543608
>>16543600
those launch sites are in a straighter line than the coast they're next to, seems pretty impressive to me
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 12:38:48 UTC No. 16543618
I want to build an expansive rail network on Mars connecting all the colonies.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 12:41:14 UTC No. 16543619
>>16543618
that's not hard at all considering there are currently around 0 colonies on mars
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 12:42:46 UTC No. 16543620
>>16543619
>he doesn't know
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 12:44:37 UTC No. 16543622
>>16543540
Lmao
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 12:44:46 UTC No. 16543623
>>16543600
>Why is this one not on the same axis?
It is. The launch tower thing is on rails and moves away from the rocket
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 12:48:34 UTC No. 16543625
>>16543623
BONUS: How far we've fallen
>The 209-foot-tall mobile service tower on Pad 39-A of Space Launch Complex 36 on Cape Canaveral Air Force Station careens to the left after 122 pounds of explosives eliminated the base. The tower is one of two that were identified for demolition.
>Complex 36 hosted many historic missions over the years including Surveyor, Mariner, Pioneer 10 and 11, Pioneer Venus spacecraft included an orbiter and a set of probes that were dispatched to the surface.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 12:53:35 UTC No. 16543627
>>16543623
>rails
Sounds very Soviet.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 13:01:43 UTC No. 16543628
>>16543593
all the time
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 13:08:35 UTC No. 16543631
>>16543625
but anon, we don't have the technology for reusable mobile service towers
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 13:39:30 UTC No. 16543638
I am sick to death of all these false-colour images being shared in normie spaces. Rainbow Mercury, radioactive Io, blue-streak Enceladus, clear Titan, deep-blue Neptune. I am so sick of them. But the worst has to be orange Venus.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 14:01:00 UTC No. 16543649
>>16543638
NASA continuously sews the seeds of conspiracy which will be their own undoing by publishing false color and composite images without clearly explaining what they are and how they were produced. They give conspiritards the ammunition they need to label NASA as liars publishing fake photographs. This is starting to become a PR crisis which will ultimately lead to the elimination of NASA funding.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 14:01:00 UTC No. 16543650
>>16543638
who cares. The point of these images is to attract normies who don't know any better. Even if they forget about it 10 seconds later, it's still better than nothing. In the future they may think just a little bit more positively about space.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 14:03:25 UTC No. 16543651
>>16543650
I don't want normies to think or care about space. I want normies to stay the fuck on Earth.
Imagine if we colonise Alpha Centauri, bringing only the explorers and thinkers and creating a population of geniuses. Only the best of us should be allowed to leave Earth.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 14:04:04 UTC No. 16543654
>>16543628
>Columbia, the one shuttle infamous for being too fat to even reach the ISS
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 14:04:50 UTC No. 16543655
>>16543650
This is the kind of short sighted thinking that sabotages NASA.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 14:07:38 UTC No. 16543657
Video from a braindead SLS enjoyer who even quotes Richard Shelby as the voice of reason
I couldn't finish it, but apparently spending $4 billion per launch is just the cheapest way to get to space
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iGZ
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 14:09:48 UTC No. 16543659
>>16543657
>The Mars Cult
>biggest problem
>community
From the title alone, I can tell that the author is a dumb faggot with EDS.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 14:14:19 UTC No. 16543661
>>16543588
Why would it? It's not a government pork program that has to have a name.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 14:16:15 UTC No. 16543663
>>16543654
perhaps that was the joke? it was a great sequence to watch.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 14:17:55 UTC No. 16543664
>>16543651
>I don't want normies to think or care about space.
are you retarded? Consider for a moment why NASA's budget has been falling for basically half a century now. Funny how it was at it's peak when Americans were obsessed with landing on the moon, isn't it? Publicity is good, just because you want to remain an elitist faggot won't change that simple fact.
>I want normies to stay the fuck on Earth.
and they will. The difference is whether they will hinder us or not. I hope you can understand that one day.
>>16543655
please elaborate
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 14:21:44 UTC No. 16543665
>>16543657
did he make this video like 4 years ago
cuz it seems insanely dated to be released today
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 14:23:27 UTC No. 16543667
>>16543664
Who gives a fuck about NASA? What are they doing to get us off-world? Jews have, and never will, care about exploring new lands. NASA is totally irrelevant in the grand scheme of things.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 14:25:03 UTC No. 16543668
>>16543109
Musk only cares about using the government he brought to maximize profits and pardon him for lying to Tesla shareholders. The "I really care about us being interplantary ASAP guy" has always been bullshit same as "I love electric cars because they save the planet" before backing the "drill baby drill" guy.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 14:26:29 UTC No. 16543673
>>16543668
? electric cars exist because self-driving electric cars are needed for mars
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 14:31:09 UTC No. 16543678
>>16543298
>he still thinks the free market gives a fuck about space
>he still thinks manned fight would ever happen without government funding
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 14:32:04 UTC No. 16543680
>>16543678
he's right
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 14:32:54 UTC No. 16543682
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eQZ
>What's new with Flight 7's massively upgraded Starship?!?
INSANE NEW VIDEO WOW
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 14:33:55 UTC No. 16543684
>>16543668
drilling for oil and using EVs is not contradictory you retard
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 14:34:21 UTC No. 16543685
>>16543298
>more competition = less innovation
is this that commie faggot making a return?
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 14:36:22 UTC No. 16543688
>>16543682
That's crazy.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 14:40:29 UTC No. 16543692
>>16543687
Delayed
>Delayed
Delayed
>Delayed
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 14:41:54 UTC No. 16543693
>>16543682
this guy is hella onions
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 14:42:46 UTC No. 16543694
>>16543682
Eyewatering
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 15:14:30 UTC No. 16543725
>>16543638
>deep-blue Neptune
nice try throwing that one in like anyone with a telescope can't tell you that neptune is much bluer than caelus
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 15:23:45 UTC No. 16543730
>>16543725
>caelus
edgelord detectedd
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 15:32:12 UTC No. 16543736
if SpaceX was an old space company, they would not create star link and wouldn't have payloads to launch
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 15:35:59 UTC No. 16543739
>>16543736
also they wouldn't have built re-usable rockets and would be seeking cost plus government contracts instead of innovating
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 15:37:42 UTC No. 16543740
>>16543736
SpaceX will become an old space company because they will miss out the expendable rocket revolution.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 15:42:08 UTC No. 16543744
>>16543740
well, it would save on all that complicated landing equipment and the inevitable crash landings on land and sea. Just think of how many whales are injured and killed when that happens.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 15:44:05 UTC No. 16543747
>>16543732
He'll just handwave how no one knows refurbishment cost and how actually it's possible they are spending the cost to make a booster on inspections and repairs. Of course any evidence will be based on shittle
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 16:02:47 UTC No. 16543754
God dammit I thought Starship was still on for tomorrow.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 16:21:08 UTC No. 16543767
>>16543516
lol I remember this launch that was silly.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 16:51:32 UTC No. 16543785
>>16543651
Sounds like a good plan for ending up dying from a telephone borne disease.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 16:53:08 UTC No. 16543787
>>16543782
what is he going to do when SLS gets axed
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 16:53:18 UTC No. 16543788
starship needs solid boosters
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 16:55:15 UTC No. 16543790
>>16543788
give your reasoning
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 16:55:45 UTC No. 16543791
>>16543682
> EveryGay Astronaut openly weeping because he was going to miss another Starship launch.
And it's all your fault because he's only one person and has to -- go to California to film a segment on a start-up making a small sat that takes your selfie in space or something.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 17:01:06 UTC No. 16543794
>>16543788
you're probably right but musk will never hear it.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 17:04:20 UTC No. 16543798
>>16543791
i hate these youtube grifters and hope they all die
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 17:07:02 UTC No. 16543800
>>16543797
and again /sfg/ is proven as a leader in space memes
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 17:08:27 UTC No. 16543801
>>16543788
self landing SRBs?
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 17:09:26 UTC No. 16543802
>>16543801
they fish them out of the water like fairing halves or shuttle srbs
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 17:12:37 UTC No. 16543804
>>16543802
i like boosters that dont just fall into the ocean
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 17:13:32 UTC No. 16543805
>>16543804
what about boosters falling onto villages
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 17:15:18 UTC No. 16543806
>>16543805
so long as it's accurate im ok with that
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 17:21:18 UTC No. 16543809
>>16543788
I was about to say Starship needs SRBs like a car needs a kick stage but that was planned for the roadster at one point
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 17:39:33 UTC No. 16543818
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 17:46:21 UTC No. 16543820
>>16543801
Wonder if they could have deployable wings large enough to turn into gliders. How much does an SRB that has burnt through its fuel weigh?
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 17:51:14 UTC No. 16543825
>>16543820
the weight depends on many things
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 17:55:14 UTC No. 16543828
>>16543787
daily updates for spacex moving around tanks and shit, like every other spacetuber
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 17:58:38 UTC No. 16543836
>>16543825
Of course but I'm really think of, does the solid fuel consist of 10% of the booster's weight or 90%? Somewhere between? If it's on the higher side, the empty booster might be light enough to work as a glider that can land somewhere rather than fall into the ocean.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 18:01:49 UTC No. 16543838
>>16543836
then it needs landing gear and a guidance system and all that fancy stuff. with all these damn things flying around it would start to look like some kind of megabot turning into half a dozen little super bots. thats crazy
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 18:04:23 UTC No. 16543842
>>16543837
just a few years ago this was a beautiful beach full of beetles
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 18:04:24 UTC No. 16543843
>>16543838
we should do it specifically for that reason
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 18:06:41 UTC No. 16543844
>>16543842
>Beautiful
Not really, but today it's still a beach full of beetles, and now there's a launch complex for a really cool rocket behind it.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 18:08:45 UTC No. 16543846
>>16543843
the choreography could be beautiful, you have a good point
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 18:09:11 UTC No. 16543847
>>16543692
Not delayed 11 hours now.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 18:09:30 UTC No. 16543849
>>16543732
The only arguments they have against booster reuse is from a former monopoly that barely makes a living selling tanks and launches.
And they wanted to reuse the parts they have to pay extra for, 3rd party engines.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 18:10:38 UTC No. 16543850
if you cant launch in the middle of a snow hurricane like soyuz then you need to go back to the drawing board because this a joke
2025 and they're still scared of a light wind
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 18:11:45 UTC No. 16543851
>>16543831
muh rovers and "exploration"
literally make work memes
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 18:15:55 UTC No. 16543855
>>16543850
In Soviet Russia You blow wind
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 18:16:33 UTC No. 16543857
>>16543673
Why? Just use a dirt bike.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 18:17:04 UTC No. 16543858
>>16543854
there is still plent of time to delay it to the 15th
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 18:25:52 UTC No. 16543862
>>16543854
>11 hours now
deja vu...
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 18:32:28 UTC No. 16543866
>>16543788
what kind of SRBs are rapidly re-usable and can be manufactured on Mars with ISRU?
please respond
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 18:43:07 UTC No. 16543874
>>16543866
well mars is covered in perchlorates which are a common oxidizer for sold rockets
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 18:44:24 UTC No. 16543877
>>16543788
The shuttle SRBs cost just as much to make new as refurbishing. It's a stupid idea
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 18:45:53 UTC No. 16543878
>>16543877
Much like heat shield tiles, that was a shuttle problem, not a reuse problem.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 18:51:43 UTC No. 16543882
>>16543878
remanufacturing SRBs is always going to be much more expensive than just pumping in liquified gas
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 18:52:34 UTC No. 16543883
>>16543874
okay, but what about unsold rockets?
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 18:55:24 UTC No. 16543885
>>16543878
Both tiles and SRBs are part of what made up those 'shuttle problems'. Why would you appeal to tiles like they're easily solved when they continue to be the most pernicious problem today?
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 19:01:35 UTC No. 16543890
>>16543229
>reminder there are people in space every day and nobody cares
everyday no further than ~250 miles from Earth for the past 25 years woooow
Remember when we used to travel to the moon? Me neither
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 19:04:13 UTC No. 16543892
>>16543878
SRBs are inherently not worth reusing because they're just tubes. Fishing tubes out of the water are a complete waste of time and part of why oldspace can't compete
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 19:05:38 UTC No. 16543894
>>16543890
its really too bad that things got stuck in LEO for so long. i guess politicians just had other priorities (that i need not mention here)
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 19:05:38 UTC No. 16543895
>>16543882
maybe, but not necessarily as expensive as building a new one. and don't pretend liquid refurbishment is as simple as just filling it up a second time.
>>16543885
shuttle's only real problems were that it had to carry crew on every flight, and that they were locked into a design before they knew what would be hard to refurbish.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 19:13:36 UTC No. 16543902
>>16543895
>maybe, but not necessarily as expensive as building a new one. and don't pretend liquid refurbishment is as simple as just filling it up a second time.
that is the goal, to be about as simple as refilling an airplane would be
it wouldn't be refurbishment
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 19:14:24 UTC No. 16543903
Shitty Rocket Boosters
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 19:14:41 UTC No. 16543904
why didn't BO just build a bigger rocket and land back at the launch site ?
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 19:16:18 UTC No. 16543905
>>16543895
Liquid reuse has been hard so far because RP1 makes a lot of soot that needs to be cleaned. With methane the ideal is to not do much. SRBs only exist because reuse was impossible so rockets needed a powerful cheap stage to give it a lot more delta v. They're outdated
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 19:17:19 UTC No. 16543906
>>16543904
Why didn't they build a bigger rocket and land on the ocean?
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 19:19:49 UTC No. 16543908
One interesting thing about the New Glenn first stage is it can throttle down enough to hover. Which means it should be easier to land than the Falcons first stage
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 19:20:02 UTC No. 16543909
>>16543906
why land on a barge that takes a week to drive back to shore
spacex only does barges because of limited payload capacity
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 19:20:44 UTC No. 16543910
>>16543895
The things that could be reasonably written after "the shuttle's real problems" could fill a library
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 19:22:19 UTC No. 16543912
>>16543909
Because that's not a big deal and it's worth the performance increase
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 19:28:22 UTC No. 16543918
>>16543913
gas venting has to be done like 4ft above the surface in texas. in states like california is higher, about 12ft or something.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 19:28:22 UTC No. 16543919
>>16543913
>use concrete blocks
>cheap step ladders
they are really making space ghetto style again
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 19:28:49 UTC No. 16543920
>>16543919
SN16, so this was a while ago
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 19:31:00 UTC No. 16543923
>>16543912
There's a huge performance penalty implicit in being a small launch vehicle which you need in order to be reasonably transported over roads
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 19:31:28 UTC No. 16543924
If the booster had legs, would it be able to land on an ocean droneship, or is it too big and heavy?
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 19:32:15 UTC No. 16543925
https://x.com/Blobifie/status/18784
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 19:33:50 UTC No. 16543927
>>16543923
right so you shouldn't make it worse. Glad we agree
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 19:36:55 UTC No. 16543929
>>16543925
ship reuse lol
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 19:39:24 UTC No. 16543931
>>16543925
thats a long ass fucking tow
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 19:39:27 UTC No. 16543932
>>16543924
>If the booster had legs
you're fired
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 19:45:27 UTC No. 16543936
>>16543924
just put a tower on the droneship dummy
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 19:47:06 UTC No. 16543939
>>16543924
just put a droneship on the booster dummy
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 19:47:28 UTC No. 16543940
>>16543920
nah its fine. you dont need special space blocks or space ladders to get shit done. its good
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 19:48:30 UTC No. 16543941
>>16543924
just land it on the leg module instead of the tower. problem solved.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 19:49:53 UTC No. 16543944
>>16543927
Just make a bigger rocket, have better margins and land at the launch pad with less penalty. Then you save on all the logistics of retrieval on top of having better performance. Get rid of the legs while you're at it and you save even more mass that goes right back into margin. But I guess only SpaceX can do things right and everyone else is forced to copy with a 10-20 year lag time
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 19:50:09 UTC No. 16543945
>>16543924
You don't need legs to land on a boat
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 19:52:08 UTC No. 16543947
>>16543944
>But I guess only SpaceX can do things right and everyone else is forced to copy with a 10-20 year lag time
lol you're so fucking gay
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 19:53:06 UTC No. 16543950
>>16543945
lol
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 19:53:57 UTC No. 16543951
>>16543947
Congratulations on checking your list of things you can say when you don't have any argument
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 19:55:19 UTC No. 16543952
>>16543945
this idea is cool plus it's real innovation from china so I want it to work so bad.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 19:56:00 UTC No. 16543953
>>16543791
More importantly, his missing the first flight of New Glenn too. like wtf. Also how can he possibly miss them when they both keep getting pushed back
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 19:58:21 UTC No. 16543954
so how long left until BONG delay?
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 19:59:05 UTC No. 16543955
I am going to bed, send me an Amber alert if the launch gets fucking delayed again
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 20:01:55 UTC No. 16543958
>>16543955
sure, for a tikkie
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 20:02:29 UTC No. 16543960
>blue origin is actually going to orbit before starship
I don't feel so good...
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 20:02:55 UTC No. 16543961
more like starshit
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 20:03:13 UTC No. 16543962
>>16543954
scrub at t+1
so in about 10 hours
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 20:03:20 UTC No. 16543963
this is why mr. musk needs more indians
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 20:03:49 UTC No. 16543964
>>16543963
To run his video game accounts?
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 20:05:08 UTC No. 16543966
Musk sisters!
We. Have. To. Organize. Our. Cope.
for when New Glenn (yuck) reaches orbit flawlessly on first try. Any ideas?
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 20:06:44 UTC No. 16543968
>>16543966
Smaller payload, not fully reusable.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 20:07:33 UTC No. 16543971
>>16543966
I'm just gonna ironically doompost until I fall asleep, that always makes me feel better and gets a good chuckle out of me.
musksisters, too cocky, etc etc...
Apologize at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 20:09:08 UTC No. 16543975
>>16543966
> SpaceX already has Falcon Heavy which outperforms New Glenn on every metric
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 20:10:47 UTC No. 16543977
Heres how media will frame it
>SpaceX rival Blue Origin New Glenn beats Starship to orbit
or someshit like that, to keep up the muh billionaire space race narrative that draws clicks/views
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 20:12:40 UTC No. 16543980
>>16543977
>Billionaires like Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, and... Richard Branson!
AAAAAGHHHHHHHHHH
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 20:15:14 UTC No. 16543984
>>16543979
not staying up to watch it but first thing i'll check out a replay. im happy for all rocketry success so here's hoping.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 20:16:18 UTC No. 16543987
>>16543979
well, let me clarify that statement - all rocketry success apart from the Chinese. May all their rip off copies explode on the pad forever.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 20:18:53 UTC No. 16543991
>>16543951
Being a passive agressive little girl means that you have conceded. You don't really have an argument because you don't know anything about building rockets. There could be a lot of loistics reasons why BO have done things the way they have. The you people show up and say why don't they JUST do what I want instead? Using the word JUST basically proves you are on the lowest point of the dunning kruger scale
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 20:19:28 UTC No. 16543993
>>16543979
wait, is it gonna be a night landing attempt?? seriously? wtf blue origin, how do you expect to attract more public and normies...
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 20:21:32 UTC No. 16543996
>>16543979
I hope they will. Competition is good.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 20:31:02 UTC No. 16544002
>>16543979
>/sfg/ thinks
I've been saying they're never making it on the first try for ever now you feckless faggot.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 20:31:23 UTC No. 16544003
>>16543993
robots can see in the dark. its ok.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 20:42:20 UTC No. 16544013
>>16543991
I'm seeing a lot of whining for someone talking about being gay and girly. Somebody doth protest too much.
>they have their reasons!!
So? Is the launch market going to ask for excuses?
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 20:44:31 UTC No. 16544015
>>16543979
I'd be incredibly surprised if the launch fails, BO is all about being unreasonably slow and overcautious
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 20:49:39 UTC No. 16544017
>>16544002
you're not /sfg/
don't pretend to be him
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 20:59:53 UTC No. 16544023
>1AM
>not Starship
meh
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 21:00:01 UTC No. 16544024
>>16544020
i call fake. theres no way that tall rocket came out of that little hanger
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 21:01:22 UTC No. 16544027
>>16544020
ehhhh...
Now BO is eligible for worst space host award
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 21:02:20 UTC No. 16544028
>>16544027
at least they ain't minorities
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 21:03:24 UTC No. 16544029
>>16544028
Cute minority, like Jessie or that Asian girl, is better than old hag.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 21:03:37 UTC No. 16544030
I miss Insprucker...
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 21:04:32 UTC No. 16544031
>>16544027
where are the men?
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 21:06:53 UTC No. 16544033
>>16544027
top one could have a smoking body and is named like a rocket, which is cool. the bottom one looks ok, and im a sucker for brunettes, but shes wearing some kind of occult symbol around her neck. But again, theres a good chance of a visually pleasing physique.
overall, and until further notice, a strong 7/10. Their voices and enthusiasm will really decide things, along with the aforementioned hot bods
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 21:08:23 UTC No. 16544035
>>16544033
>occult symbol
thats a star of david
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 21:13:45 UTC No. 16544037
>>16544035
oh yeah
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 21:20:33 UTC No. 16544046
>>16544045
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/18785
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 21:26:42 UTC No. 16544054
>>16544046
somehow he's evil for this, does it for his ego, etc etc
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 21:30:15 UTC No. 16544058
>>16544054
Looks like standard corporate PR stuff. Pretty low cost at that.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 21:34:09 UTC No. 16544062
>>16544054
>He's clearly doing it because he's racist. He's only restoring internet access to LA so he can resume spreading racist hate. It'll be broadcasting nothing but anti-trans trumpaganda. He can't use Starlink to change the votes if the wifi isn't working. He probably started the fires with his satellite directed energy weapons (#DEW) so he could do this to make people think he's not evil and con more money out of the government
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 21:36:17 UTC No. 16544064
>>16543877
How much less would the refurbs cost if the SRBs hadn't been soaked in salt water?
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 21:36:53 UTC No. 16544065
>>16544062
watch out how once Kuiper is online (one day...), people will start unironically shilling for it as an alternative just because it's not Musk's lmao
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 21:39:31 UTC No. 16544066
>>16544065
Doubt Kuiper ever actually happens but if it does, it's likely that Starlink will already have been spun off as an independent company without Musk at the helm since Starlink was always meant to be sold off to create a huge profit for SpaceX to fund their development activities.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 21:41:02 UTC No. 16544067
>>16543874
and aluminum
but you'd have to make most of the hydrocarbons from scratch, I guess
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 21:48:42 UTC No. 16544076
>>16544066
Starlink is there to pay itself off. No one can pay them what the future prospects of the constellation are worth. It would only be spun off if forced by the govt
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 21:54:14 UTC No. 16544080
>>16544076
i read its cost about $10bn so far, or will have soon. if thats true then it'll pay off pretty damn quick
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 21:54:31 UTC No. 16544081
>>16544064
how are you going to land them not in the ocean? The Russians had a concept where strap on boosters would deploy wings and glide back but that's just way more complicated
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 21:57:47 UTC No. 16544085
>>16544081
bouncy castle
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 22:04:31 UTC No. 16544093
>>16544081
Theoretically, you could have them come down horizontally on parachutes and then touch down on a series of airbags. If airbags won't work there's a lot of options for landing struts and retrorockets that could probably get the job done. The tricky part is getting the booster coming down slow enough for them to work while doing it sideways so you don't need to worry about it tipping over.
That, and finding land eastward of your launch site for them to come down on. That's a problem is most places that aren't Baikonur or Jiuquan
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 22:10:02 UTC No. 16544099
>>16543219
can it be less pointy? how flat can the top be?
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 22:12:46 UTC No. 16544102
>>16544093
just fly back and land in a fresh water canal
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 22:56:07 UTC No. 16544131
>>16544046
how long can a fully charged cybertruck power a standard starlink terminal?
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 22:57:58 UTC No. 16544132
>>16544131
well my mini, I can power it like 12 hours off of a 150wh battery. and infinitely off of the battery + a 50w solar panel.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:03:32 UTC No. 16544136
Swear to fucking GOD if this piece of shit gets delayed again...
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:06:07 UTC No. 16544137
>>16544136
what? what you gonna do huh? huh?
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:13:09 UTC No. 16544141
>>16544131
few seconds of googling, standard dish uses about 1kwh per day and cybertruck has 123kwh battery pack
so I guess about 3-4 months
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:14:08 UTC No. 16544142
>>16544141
uhhhh that's not exactly correct
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:14:10 UTC No. 16544143
fuck I'm going to oversleep aren't I
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:16:14 UTC No. 16544145
>>16544142
50 W per hour idling and 100 W per hour active
I guess if it was active around the clock that would be 2.4kwh per day, so about 50 days
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:16:24 UTC No. 16544146
>>16544143
yes. you're going to miss the livestream and wake up more even more remorseful than usual. sorry about that
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:17:55 UTC No. 16544148
>>16544146
its over
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:19:29 UTC No. 16544152
>>16544093
If parachutes work so well, why isn't SpaceX using them?
SpaceX tried parachutes for boosters and then fairings. They gave up on boosters real quick, and took a while to give up with fairings. They're just too hard to control.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:21:41 UTC No. 16544154
>>16543732
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/18785
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:23:38 UTC No. 16544155
>>16544148
ain't over until the fat lady sings anon. do the right thing and set an alarm. you know you want to.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:25:08 UTC No. 16544156
im not staying up for NG1 launch...whats the best way to just be able to get up and go directly to the recorded live stream without seeing anything about what happened? is there a link to the stream posted already?
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:25:12 UTC No. 16544157
>>16544152
what the fuck? SpaceX is still using them on fairings
they are just allowing them to splash down in the sea instead of trying to catch them with a net, but still very much have parachutes
rocket lab is also using parachutes on their smaller boosters, so they would probably work but might just require so much refurbishment it doesn't make sense
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:26:40 UTC No. 16544158
>>16544081
Russian boosters were also LRB rather than SRB with thick steel walls.
Horizontal travel also increases the dry mass due to the need for additional structural reinforcement, this is a big part of why aircraft launched rockets suck.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:28:00 UTC No. 16544159
>>16544156
not up but should be here https://x.com/blueorigin
according to this >>16544115
youtube too I guess, probably better idea to go to that livestream to not get spoiled
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OOE
>New Glenn Mission NG-1 Webcast
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:28:05 UTC No. 16544160
>>16544152
Parachutes are fine, albeit a bit tricky to design when you're trying to land booster-sized objects. What parachutes can't do is land them precisely.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:28:18 UTC No. 16544161
>1am beginning of 3 hour launch window
Have fun staying up until 4am only to get cucked.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:29:49 UTC No. 16544163
>>16544093
>That, and finding land eastward of your launch site for them to come down on. That's a problem is most places that aren't Baikonur or Jiuquan
Easterly launches from Vandenberg when.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:31:21 UTC No. 16544164
there's that chinese launch in a few hours right? the sea launch one.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:33:02 UTC No. 16544165
>>16543657
Just saw it and went to post it here. Seriously where do these guys come from? Every part of it is so wrong and resentful
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:34:12 UTC No. 16544166
>>16544164
Why are you telling the thread about this in the form of a question?
Just post a link to the launch.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:35:00 UTC No. 16544167
>>16544166
i dont have a link
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:35:30 UTC No. 16544168
>>16544163
NASA is too risk adverse to launch over land if they can avoid it.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:39:30 UTC No. 16544171
>>16544163
It turns out that if you head straight East from Vandenberg and travel the rough distance of a Falcon 9 ASDS landing you end up in the same neighborhood as Edwards, so it might not be the most outlandish thing anyone's ever proposed
Anonymous at Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:40:04 UTC No. 16544172
>>16544159
appreciate it anon thanks. gonna watch that first thing then come shoot the shit all over again with everyone who already knows
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 00:04:59 UTC No. 16544178
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 00:05:07 UTC No. 16544179
>>16544176
SEIS HORAS TOMODACHIS
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 00:13:09 UTC No. 16544185
>>16543366
I've got a feeling that the landing burn will be the biggest test for NG, will either fail to reignite or will fly it in the wrong direction.
Also betting one of those legs collapse/ fail deployment.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 00:14:37 UTC No. 16544187
we all know what will really happen
t-2 second scrub because of a dumb valve. then launch is pushed back 8 days while they replace it
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 00:16:24 UTC No. 16544189
So Blue Ring can function like SpaceX’s transporter missions? Mass rideshare, but at a greater scale since NG is like 3x the mass to LEO than Falcon 9?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 00:19:30 UTC No. 16544193
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 00:24:20 UTC No. 16544195
>>16544193
>>16544163
Keep in mind that because of their inclination you don't actually launch due east from either Vandenberg or some place on the great lakes.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 00:26:12 UTC No. 16544196
>>16544154
How many of those 25 missions were high-energy, huh?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 00:27:01 UTC No. 16544197
>>16544193
RTLS, launch from Keeweena rocket range
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 00:32:10 UTC No. 16544200
are you guys excited
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 00:33:17 UTC No. 16544201
>>16544200
no cuz as soon as you get excited it scrubs or gets delayed
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 00:34:21 UTC No. 16544202
>>16544196
Five. Türksat 5B, Hotbird 13G, Satria, Telkomsat Merah Putih 2, and Koreasat 6A. High-energy isn't a market with all that many customers these days
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 00:35:27 UTC No. 16544203
>>16544187
Yep
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 00:35:35 UTC No. 16544204
>>16544187
unfortunately the most likely outcome of tonight
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 00:35:46 UTC No. 16544205
>>16544196
Do you really want to compare how many 'high energy' launches SpaceX has done in that length of time?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 00:39:05 UTC No. 16544209
>>16544159
I swear to god, if they show the altitude in f*et instead of km I'm gonna be pissed. Fuck the imperial units.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 00:45:04 UTC No. 16544211
>>16543945
desu thats better than legs, probably saves a few tons of weight, and hence a higher payload or remaining delta-v beyond LEO.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 00:50:50 UTC No. 16544213
>>16543952
vaguely recall some redditor posted a drawing of that concept like 10 years ago
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 00:52:01 UTC No. 16544215
>>16544206
"It's kind of insane to try and land the booster."
lmao
Bezos
alright
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 01:01:34 UTC No. 16544220
oh god, I can't wait for elon to tweet "welcome to the club"
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 01:05:22 UTC No. 16544224
Scott Manley single handedly making New Glenn look good
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 01:05:46 UTC No. 16544226
>>16544223
Just use stainless steel
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 01:07:06 UTC No. 16544227
>>16544223
those are not pneumatic tires
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 01:07:11 UTC No. 16544228
>>16544226
As you can see, rubber tires work just fine.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 01:07:24 UTC No. 16544229
>>16544223
expendable aerospace-grade tires made out of alabama river rocks, manufactured throughout all 50 states, price of 4 billion usd plus tip
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 01:07:43 UTC No. 16544230
>>16544228
No, they don't.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 01:08:10 UTC No. 16544231
>>16544223
>The temperature differentials on the lunar surface are outside the operating ranges of vulcanized rubber
>The sharp dust of the lunar surface abrades polymers rapidly
>Any soft walled material full of air will rapidly lose all gas pressure completely with even a pinhole leak in vacuum
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 01:08:29 UTC No. 16544232
>>16544223
don't they get brittle or out gas or some shit?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 01:08:33 UTC No. 16544233
>>16544227
Yes they were.
>The two nitrogen-filled rubber tires on the MET were the first tires on the Moon. They were designed by Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company and called Experimental Lunar Tires (XLTs). The biggest challenge for Goodyear was that NASA specifications required the inner tube be inflated to 1.5 psi on the Moon surface; a difficult task. A tire with 1.5 psi on Earth has an inflation pressure of 16.2 psi on the Moon because atmospheric pressure (14.7 psi) isn't a factor there. Goodyear solved the gauge pressure problem by having NASA partially inflate the inner tube with nitrogen so that on the Moon it reached 1.5 psi. The tire maker gave the synthetic rubber tube a special coating to improve gas retention.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 01:11:03 UTC No. 16544234
>>16544232
no, the tires worked well.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 01:14:42 UTC No. 16544236
>>16544234
For the narrow operating regime specific to manned EVAs on the lunar surface. The tires did not have the performance needed for the lunar rovers, hence the metal mesh wheels.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 01:15:40 UTC No. 16544238
So what are the odds this launch is worth staying up for (total success or dramatic explosion)? 20%?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 01:15:54 UTC No. 16544239
>>16544236
they could just make bigger ones. tire technology has come a long way since the 60s, particularly for low pressure tires and flexible impermeable membranes.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 01:16:57 UTC No. 16544241
>>16544238
about roughly 50% per cent
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 01:18:51 UTC No. 16544243
>>16544238
sorry that's only on L2
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 01:18:53 UTC No. 16544244
>>16544221
anyone got the bezos champagne gif? Be sure to save it for launch.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 01:19:48 UTC No. 16544246
>You don't understand!! we NEED complaint tires on the powdery surface of the moon!!
>no other wheels in the history of mankind have worked on soft surfaces!
>ESPECIALLY at the breakneck 20 km/h we'll be running for the next decade
...
RETVRN
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 01:19:52 UTC No. 16544247
LET US RECOLLECT
WHAT A FIRST STAGE SEA LANDING CAN LOOK LIKE IF IT FAILS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvi
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 01:21:00 UTC No. 16544248
>>16544247
we won't sea it anyway, blorg will end the stream
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 01:22:27 UTC No. 16544249
>>16544246
This is how we should be building rovers: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_nR
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 01:23:33 UTC No. 16544251
>>16544239
This field has seen very little improvement in materials performance since the 1960s, with most innovation being focused on making the products more environmentally friendly. The performance envelope you're asking for doesn't exist.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 01:24:15 UTC No. 16544252
>>16544238
the only thing not worth staying up for is a scrub, which is unfortunately fairly likely
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 01:26:35 UTC No. 16544253
Cybertruck just can't compete https://youtu.be/q2ZLYyx2xXM?t=199
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 01:26:56 UTC No. 16544254
>>16544251
>This field has seen very little improvement in materials performance since the 1960s
Now tell us how many miles a set of tires from the sixties would typically last.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 01:26:59 UTC No. 16544255
I'm staying up the whole night up until 8am my time to watch the scrub. Still over 4 hours left...
Wish be luck bros.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 01:28:42 UTC No. 16544258
>>16544251
Completely and utterly wrong. High performance tires for racing applications have come a very long way and much of that development is transferable to ultra-low pressure space tires.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 01:29:22 UTC No. 16544259
>>16544246
Based but I'll one up you.
>low gravity
>effectively 0 air resistance
>no zoning law bullshit
>no existing property to manage tracks around
>everything on Mars will be built in dense complexes, no urban sprawl, just point a to point b
>half the planet is flat as a fucking pancake
>how wide do you want your tracks to be sir? Yes
Mars is BVILT for the train autist
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 01:30:04 UTC No. 16544260
>>16543966
even if new glenn doesn't explode, it means nothing to me
their next rocket will launch in 30 years, when there are already cities on Mars
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 01:30:47 UTC No. 16544261
>>16544254
All of the improvements between Bias Ply and Radial tires came from the direction of the weave and the use of steel in the tire. The rubber hasn't gotten better.
>>16544258
I strongly suspect the improvements in this field are down to the engineering of the tire, rather than any improvements in the underlying materials.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 01:33:03 UTC No. 16544263
>>16544261
We have many new materials that could be used to improve gas retention in space tires, and the advances in tire engineering would help enormously too of course.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 01:33:55 UTC No. 16544264
>>16544263
>We have many new materials that could be used to improve gas retention in space tires
Such as?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 01:34:31 UTC No. 16544265
>>16544259
>>low gravity
I don't think that helps trains... particularly since they'd be built light already just to get launched into space.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 01:35:16 UTC No. 16544266
>>16544264
IDK go check the 3M product catalogue
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 01:37:35 UTC No. 16544267
>>16544259
You are correct that rail will dominate for all logistical and economical transport, but you can't beat the flexibility of having big wheels that take you wherever the fuck you want to go.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 01:38:33 UTC No. 16544268
>>16544265
>I don't think that helps trains
It means your hauled tonnage is able to be increased massively. If you are building lightweight trains on E*rth for some ungodly reason then this just improves the equation. In reality, once you can make steel, making trains is pretty straightforward. We've been doing this for like 200 years.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 01:38:57 UTC No. 16544269
>wheels
>wheels
>wheels
it's gonna be treads all day on the moon. sorry losers
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 01:41:23 UTC No. 16544272
gonna take a short 3 hour nap, wake me up when the stream starts, k?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 01:42:19 UTC No. 16544273
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R8i
I'm hyped
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 01:46:25 UTC No. 16544277
>>16544269
Cernan always thought that astronauts needed ski poles for the moon, you'd kangaroo around
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 01:48:11 UTC No. 16544279
>>16544269
>moon dust is famous for its ability to absolutely destroy any sort of mating surface or joint through sheer abrasiveness
>lets throw in tracks, which are basically a series of hundreds of rotating joints, right into middle of it
I'm not going to tell you no, because the data for how bad the moon dust is comes from NASA and they are incredibly gay and might be overselling the entire problem, but wheels are still 100 times cheaper and simpler to manufacture and maintain than tracks.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 01:48:25 UTC No. 16544280
IS SPONGE ANON AWAKE???????
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 01:51:37 UTC No. 16544282
>>16544259
nah TUBES is the way to go for mars. lego predicted it
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 01:55:12 UTC No. 16544283
>>16544282
>Gimmicks made of parts with only one purpose
>Weird colors
>Part counts stripped down to the bone
The absolute low point in LEGO.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 01:55:18 UTC No. 16544284
>>16544259
Imagine how fast you could get trains going with no air resistance, dead straight lines, no worry about animal collisions or shifting tracks from slips and frost, falling rocks (at least on the open plains), etc... I don't see why they couldn't go arbitrarily fast.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 01:55:27 UTC No. 16544285
>>16544282
TUUUUUBES
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 01:57:30 UTC No. 16544286
>>16544283
yep. I was raised in the Jack Stone era of lego. It was tough. Luckily my family had mostly older sets, like the Arctic shit (that was awesome) and the sea bases
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 02:02:01 UTC No. 16544289
>>16544284
The limit is braking; you become friction and wear limited.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 02:02:36 UTC No. 16544290
>>16544286
Ice Planet 2002 kicked ass.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 02:02:47 UTC No. 16544291
looks like the NSF livestream just came up for the big launch today
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 02:03:11 UTC No. 16544292
>>16544290
gimme the chainsaw.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 02:03:36 UTC No. 16544293
>>16544268
I think you're going to have traction problems. Increasing the mass you're hauling to make up for it seems like a pure win at first, but that will also massively increase your inertia which in turn makes your traction problem worse.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 02:04:22 UTC No. 16544294
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 02:04:56 UTC No. 16544295
>>16544291
the Jielong 3 in an hour?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 02:06:03 UTC No. 16544297
>>16544283
>parts with only one purpose
quite literally a skill issue. I used to build space ships with pirate ship hull pieces. Back in my day we had this little thing called imagination.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 02:07:08 UTC No. 16544298
>>16544297
I'm sure you built wondrous spaceships out of those dull purple archway pieces.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 02:07:41 UTC No. 16544300
>>16544298
>built
>implying I ever stopped
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 02:09:36 UTC No. 16544301
>>16544298
I certainly would.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 02:13:07 UTC No. 16544306
>>16544303
What's the point of the grid fins? It's not recoverable right?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 02:14:48 UTC No. 16544308
I'm too sick to make a launch thread, if someone else wants to that's fine.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 02:15:13 UTC No. 16544310
>>16544306
they steer the upper stage so it doesnt crash into a village. those days are passed unfortunately.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 02:17:20 UTC No. 16544311
>>16544298
literal NPC
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 02:23:23 UTC No. 16544315
>>16544303
>orient aesthetic
kek
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 02:26:37 UTC No. 16544317
>>16544306
to confuse and impress the masses who don't know any better
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 02:26:49 UTC No. 16544318
How concerned are we that Hawthorne and JPL burn down in the coming LA firestorm
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 02:28:09 UTC No. 16544320
>>16544306
it's a hopper, innit?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 02:29:23 UTC No. 16544322
>>16544318
aren't they slowing down already?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 02:32:22 UTC No. 16544324
>>16544322
The winds stopped over the weekend but are forecast to return tomorrow
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 02:35:08 UTC No. 16544325
>>16544324
Good.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 02:46:03 UTC No. 16544329
>>16544290
UFO was the best Lego line there ever was
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 02:47:16 UTC No. 16544333
>>16544329
UFO had the best medium sized sets. The UFO flagship was awesome, but the other flagship was kind of a letdown.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 03:02:00 UTC No. 16544344
JieLong-3 just launched off a barge in the south China sea.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 03:02:00 UTC No. 16544345
>>16544206
Lazy ass interview and pointless article lol. Not berger’s best but maybe he’s busy or something
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 03:03:07 UTC No. 16544348
>>16544344
livestream?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 03:04:10 UTC No. 16544350
>>16544345
there's only so much you can squeeze out of a bad lemon
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 03:06:13 UTC No. 16544352
>>16544350
Very true
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 03:06:34 UTC No. 16544353
>>16544348
just an amateurish one, focused on the crowd instead of the rocket after a minute of flight, and already finished.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 03:10:08 UTC No. 16544358
>3 hours until scrub
3 hours until scrub
>3 hours until scrub
3 hours until scrub
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 03:13:49 UTC No. 16544360
>>16544358
bezos does not scrub
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 03:13:53 UTC No. 16544361
>>16544358
Why don't they delay the scrub until after the launch?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 03:16:44 UTC No. 16544362
just scrub the scrub
it's that simple in rocketry
Apologize at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 03:16:57 UTC No. 16544363
How capable is New Glen in a manned moon mission?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 03:24:46 UTC No. 16544365
>>16544353
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gF9
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 03:29:54 UTC No. 16544368
>>16544363
It will send the manned lander for Artemis V.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 03:30:25 UTC No. 16544370
anyone who thinks E2E will never work has never had to fly overseas. that shit sucks dick.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 03:31:28 UTC No. 16544371
Clear is gonna stream it right?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 03:32:25 UTC No. 16544372
>streaming a scrub
but why?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 03:33:18 UTC No. 16544373
>>16544370
it's fine and the concorde proved that consumers won't spend more than a business class plane ticket for faster with less comfort.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 03:35:45 UTC No. 16544375
>>16544371
I don't see what not. The Launch window starts opens at 3:00 PM JST so it's not like it happen at some stupid early hour in the morning for her
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 03:37:29 UTC No. 16544376
>>16544374
10 churgers and a diet soda for me. No fries, I'm fasting.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 03:48:13 UTC No. 16544379
The NSF stream is so corny and fun!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YB
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YB
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YB
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 03:49:22 UTC No. 16544381
>>16544374
double quarter pounder with cheese, large fry
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 03:50:31 UTC No. 16544382
>>16544381
that's actually what I'm ordering
or a 20pc mcnugget
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 03:51:04 UTC No. 16544384
>>16544374
I'd love a spicy chicken sandwhich and a medium fry and a dr pepper. thanks anon
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 03:52:06 UTC No. 16544386
>>16544379
>some tranny speaking on stream
ewww
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 03:54:30 UTC No. 16544388
>>16544358
It will inevitably scrub until it is rescheduled for a time when I'm not sleeping.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 03:54:49 UTC No. 16544389
>>16544386
NSF is straight trooned out
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 03:57:03 UTC No. 16544392
>>16544389
Does spacex really have a company 737? pretty based
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 03:57:09 UTC No. 16544393
>>16544386
So tolerant of you
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 03:57:13 UTC No. 16544394
>>16544379
>open stream to check if it's been scrubbed
>close stream
That's all they're ever good for
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 03:58:22 UTC No. 16544396
>>16544392
yes it's a former air china 737-800
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 03:59:16 UTC No. 16544397
we need space races
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 03:59:31 UTC No. 16544399
>>16544389
is the tail painted to look like heat shield tiles? I never noticed that before
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 03:59:49 UTC No. 16544400
>>16544394
Spaceflight Now has live countdowns for imminent launches as well.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 04:00:31 UTC No. 16544401
>>16544371
Reminder that space VTs and rocket-chans are a psyop so that you embrace the launch of your own surveillance infrastructure.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 04:00:56 UTC No. 16544402
>>16544397
give it time
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 04:02:07 UTC No. 16544403
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E1u
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 04:04:48 UTC No. 16544404
>>16544397
We already have Whites and Chinamen, how many more do you want?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 04:08:24 UTC No. 16544407
>>16544404
no i meant like actually racing rockets and spaceships
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 04:14:57 UTC No. 16544409
>>16544407
if you think rockets can race I don't think you have a very good grasp of orbital dynamics.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 04:18:30 UTC No. 16544410
>>16544409
defeatist attitude
NGMI
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 04:26:34 UTC No. 16544415
https://x.com/ISROSpaceflight/statu
> Reason for third postponement of SpaDeX's docking: Scientists from ISRO have revealed that during the drift from 15m to 3m inter-satellite distance yesterday, there was a delay in the signals from the proximity and docking sensor which triggered an automatic abort and the vehicles subsequently retreated away to a safe distance. The next docking attempt will take place after this issue has been fixed.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 04:26:42 UTC No. 16544416
>>16544154
absolutely brutal
that's what tory gets for talking shit with nothing to back it up
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 04:35:21 UTC No. 16544419
>>16544414
he's rich enough and not Steve Jobs enough to be immune to cancer.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 04:43:30 UTC No. 16544424
>>16544419
Already had his thyroid removed/operated on a few years ago, right around the time he started gaining weight. (picrel)
He came up with some retarded story about how he hurt his neck trying to judo throw a fat guy at a birthday party or something so he needed neck surgery.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 04:44:41 UTC No. 16544425
>>16544424
>try to throw fat guy
>break neck instead
karma
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 04:46:09 UTC No. 16544428
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bg7
Spaceflight Now stream's up
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 04:46:25 UTC No. 16544430
>>16544414
>thyroid cancer
don't get scared anons. I think it's just another corrective surgery after the first three that had attempted to replace one of his cervical disks.
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment
>Elon Musk’s neck scar stems from an injury he faced at his Japanese-themed birthday party in 2013.
>The party was conducted at a castle in Tarrytown, New York. It featured a sumo match, wherein a samurai-dressed Musk was pitted against a 350-pound wrestling sumo champion. During their bout, Musk strongly attempted a “judo throw,” eventually injuring a disc in his neck in the process.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 04:46:50 UTC No. 16544431
>>16544424
elon is...very handsome
🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 04:47:44 UTC No. 16544432
>>16544424
ok aaron greenspan
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 04:50:52 UTC No. 16544436
>>16544428
imagine not watching the official bezos stream
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 04:52:37 UTC No. 16544438
>>16544436
holy shit, mad max vibes
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 04:52:58 UTC No. 16544439
Who here getting /cozy/ for New Glenn
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 04:53:23 UTC No. 16544440
>>16544430
>yeah guys I totally had a disc in my neck replaced. Please ignore the scar on the wrong side of my neck that looks suspiciously like a thyroid removal scar.
>haha I'm such a klutz I tried to judo throw a fat guy and somehow irreparably damaged my neck in the process
>What's that? You've never heard me talk about knowing judo before? I mean yeah obviously that's why I fucked up my neck so bad haha I'm so dumb. Like I said though the scar is because of that totally real injury and DEFINITELY NOT because of any thyroid issues lololol
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 04:54:26 UTC No. 16544442
>>16544428
>average American woman for scale
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 04:55:19 UTC No. 16544443
My gay lover works for Blue Origin, he told me the rocket won't fly.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 04:55:30 UTC No. 16544445
>>16544436
Is there one? I looked around but couldn't find one
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 04:55:51 UTC No. 16544446
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 04:56:12 UTC No. 16544447
>>16544445
the blue origin youtube stream starts in like 10m
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 04:56:31 UTC No. 16544448
>>16544446
fuck, I wanted those quints. Now I have to wait again
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:03:40 UTC No. 16544454
>>16544396
thing is probably bugged to all hell
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:07:19 UTC No. 16544457
>>16544456
scrubbed
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:07:35 UTC No. 16544458
>>16544456
its over
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:09:11 UTC No. 16544460
>>16544456
they are now copying musk when he is late for his presentations...
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:11:07 UTC No. 16544464
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1D8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1D8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1D8
GET IN HERE
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:11:36 UTC No. 16544465
>>16544464
no, I don't think I will.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:12:07 UTC No. 16544466
>>16544462
she's a tight little piece...
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:12:20 UTC No. 16544467
>>16544463
havent seen something like this in awhile
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:12:28 UTC No. 16544468
>>16544464
Man, it's been years since I last tuned in to some Tim Dodd's live stream. The memories...
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:12:34 UTC No. 16544469
>>16543782
>sft-7
the worst acronym yet for starship flight numbering
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:13:30 UTC No. 16544470
Anyone made a bingo card or something?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:15:24 UTC No. 16544471
launch delayed 30 minutes
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:16:49 UTC No. 16544473
>>16544471
source??
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:17:25 UTC No. 16544474
>>16544473
it came to me in a dream
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:18:03 UTC No. 16544475
>>16544471
>>16544474
I also had the same dream.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:18:32 UTC No. 16544476
eh spacex stream music is better
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:18:36 UTC No. 16544477
>>16544474
Better source than Berger's lmao
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:19:09 UTC No. 16544478
We are like the dreamer who dreams, and then lives inside the dream...
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:20:34 UTC No. 16544480
>>16544478
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3F2
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:22:09 UTC No. 16544481
Still aiming for 1am? I have to work tomorrow
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:22:20 UTC No. 16544482
I once dreamt about meeting Elon Musk in person and shaking his hand. Goddammit, I was really trembling and ended up spilling all my spaghetti.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:23:02 UTC No. 16544483
blue's stream is up
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OOE
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:23:02 UTC No. 16544484
>>16544159
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OOE
https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1mnxeApB
Blue's streams are live
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:23:26 UTC No. 16544485
>>16544481
tomorrow or today?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:23:32 UTC No. 16544486
>>16544464
apollo astronaut david duke will be at the astra awards?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:25:22 UTC No. 16544489
>>16544485
fuck
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:25:30 UTC No. 16544490
So, uhm, is YouTube going super sluggish for anybody else? Using Firefox and ublock origin...
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:26:51 UTC No. 16544493
I just took a dump and it really smells why am I like this?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:27:46 UTC No. 16544494
>>16544490
youtube on anything but chrome chugs
it's intentional on googles part
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:28:05 UTC No. 16544495
>>16544490
Youtube always seems a bit less responsive than Twitter. I've always blamed the adblock you need to make the site tolerable
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:28:41 UTC No. 16544496
Why hasn't thunderf00t busted New Glenn????
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:29:55 UTC No. 16544499
WHERE'S THE LAUNCH JEFF???????
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:30:11 UTC No. 16544500
>>16544499
STREAM LIVE
https://www.youtube.com/live/OOEPTW
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:30:39 UTC No. 16544501
wtf is this shaky cam shit
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:30:59 UTC No. 16544502
PEOPLE
HERE WE GO
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OOE
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:31:27 UTC No. 16544504
>jeff speach
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:31:30 UTC No. 16544505
>>16544501
Muh "we are authentic" ((vibe))
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:31:39 UTC No. 16544506
>>16544503
Eh, sure why not
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:31:52 UTC No. 16544509
>>16544505
it even did it at the desk
are they retarded?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:31:57 UTC No. 16544510
https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1mnxeApB
Live Blue Origin
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:32:13 UTC No. 16544512
>>16544503
would and at the climax I would yell "BLUE ORIGIN WAS STARTED BEFORE SPACEX"
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:32:18 UTC No. 16544513
IT'S UP
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:32:39 UTC No. 16544515
GUYS WE'RE DOIN IT
WE MADE IT TO ORBIT
WE'RE ASTRONAUTS
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:32:53 UTC No. 16544516
will Bezos get it up (to orbit)
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:32:58 UTC No. 16544517
>>16544514
man I should read this again sometime
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:33:00 UTC No. 16544518
>>16544514
It will land perfectly but an executive will say a racial slur on stream.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:33:03 UTC No. 16544519
>Earth
BOOOOOOOOOOOO
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:33:40 UTC No. 16544520
>her name is ariane
i cant stop thinking about her bros
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:33:44 UTC No. 16544521
pretty cool place for the commentator booth
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:33:58 UTC No. 16544523
SINGLES AND IT EXPLODES
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:33:58 UTC No. 16544524
the one on the right has very jewish features but no hook nose
im not enough of a race scientist to decipher her physiognomy
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:34:28 UTC No. 16544526
>muh california
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:34:29 UTC No. 16544527
>>16544524
seems like a stagecoach tilter
Astranon at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:34:35 UTC No. 16544528
>>16544521
Astra did something similar for NSF but the rockets were too small to see properly from there.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:34:41 UTC No. 16544530
WHERE IS PRINCESS KURIA????
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:34:51 UTC No. 16544531
I hope that stage wrecks Jeff's mom
This slow development mentality needs to die
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:35:28 UTC No. 16544532
what's the profile?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:35:35 UTC No. 16544533
New Glenn does look good
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:35:39 UTC No. 16544534
I know the guy who ran the 3d printers that made most of the engines on this BONG so if it blows up I know who to blame.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:35:41 UTC No. 16544535
>>16544525
they're both hags caked in makeup LOL
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:35:44 UTC No. 16544536
>>16544532
up then down
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:35:56 UTC No. 16544538
>>16544529
Better than the swamprat at SpaceX.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:36:02 UTC No. 16544539
>>16544531
This poster is not ferocious
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:36:08 UTC No. 16544540
>open up youtube stream
>laptop fan goes into turbo mode
guh
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:36:29 UTC No. 16544541
>>16544540
javascript
not even once
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:36:43 UTC No. 16544543
>>16544538
she looks like the wicked witch. those eye bags and wrinkles, yuck
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:36:58 UTC No. 16544545
>>16544535
Maybe but they aren't brown
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:36:58 UTC No. 16544546
>stage 2 is the bottom
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:37:09 UTC No. 16544547
>>16544542
no it's going to crash into the barge
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:37:14 UTC No. 16544548
>>16544542
Yep out at sea on a ship
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:37:24 UTC No. 16544550
>for those who are not really into rockets who are up at 1am watching our literally who company launch it's literally what rocket
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:37:25 UTC No. 16544551
>>16544544
they haven't decided yet
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:37:29 UTC No. 16544552
>>16544542
it is supposed to, but it probably wont
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:37:32 UTC No. 16544553
>>16544540
>open x broadcast
>no issue
But really, its cause CPU is processing live chat. Youtube has terrible optimization for livechat.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:37:40 UTC No. 16544555
>explaining what a rocket stage is
who do they think is up at 1am for this?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:37:42 UTC No. 16544556
>>16544544
very sus that they don't have it on stream yet
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:37:59 UTC No. 16544558
>>16544542
nope, soft water splashdown
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:38:07 UTC No. 16544559
>>16544542
It's going to land perfectly. Jeff Bezos batting 100 as usual, a breath of fresh air compared to the cheeto dust hitler ball suckling Felon
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:38:10 UTC No. 16544560
>>16544553
BO has chat disabled
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:38:24 UTC No. 16544562
>>16544543
Yeah Denisse looks better
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:38:47 UTC No. 16544563
BONG theme. Mostly about it being a long road.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zuf
Astranon at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:38:48 UTC No. 16544564
>>16544529
They were all ten years younger when they got hired.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:38:49 UTC No. 16544565
wtf homosuck reference
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:38:56 UTC No. 16544566
>>16544560
https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1mnxeApB
Try this then. It should be simple and liteweight
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:39:07 UTC No. 16544568
>>16544544
They already scrubbed, but figured they would continue with the stream for PR reasons. See you all tomorrow
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:39:35 UTC No. 16544570
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:39:37 UTC No. 16544571
>>16544568
CEASE
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:39:48 UTC No. 16544572
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:39:51 UTC No. 16544573
>>16544561
point me to one, ain't reading all that
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:39:55 UTC No. 16544574
>>16544566
based gonna open it in mpc-hc like I did for the starship launch
🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:40:01 UTC No. 16544575
Can't sleep, let's watch the launch
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:40:11 UTC No. 16544577
cringe
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:40:13 UTC No. 16544579
uhm is that a...
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:40:17 UTC No. 16544580
>live from south central
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:40:35 UTC No. 16544581
please... please just... focus on the rocket
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:40:52 UTC No. 16544582
still no T- counter
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:41:05 UTC No. 16544584
Honestly can't say anything because SpaceX is cringe too.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:41:22 UTC No. 16544586
Man I thought Spacex webcasts were awkward
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:41:45 UTC No. 16544588
>>16544586
no kidding
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:41:49 UTC No. 16544589
>no counter
>just suddenly launches
calling it
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:41:53 UTC No. 16544590
>>16544584
the early days of 1st stage landings had USA USA chants at spacex
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:41:57 UTC No. 16544591
>they signed the space hardware wth 10k people
hope they accounted for that mass
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:41:59 UTC No. 16544592
>>16544567
Where's their fruit
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:42:01 UTC No. 16544593
>>16544587
same lol
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:42:08 UTC No. 16544594
>>16544568
Blorg guy I know says half hour delay to 1:30 but it's healthy and it's gonna fly. They're watching blues brothers and getting hammered at the factory rn.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:42:31 UTC No. 16544595
>Fairing signature capacity: 10k
SpaceX bros... our response?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:42:34 UTC No. 16544597
>>16544587
Tag yourself
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:43:07 UTC No. 16544599
>>16544594
>we're on a mission from god
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:43:15 UTC No. 16544600
>>16544587
snuggy
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:43:24 UTC No. 16544601
>>16544594
blues brothers? is that like some code word for bernie bros
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:43:31 UTC No. 16544602
lmaooo already with the spacex ahh cope lines
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:43:42 UTC No. 16544603
>>16544598
needs a big explosion silhouette
where it needs to be I have no idea
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:43:45 UTC No. 16544604
>>16544595
SpaceX cultists only care about one signature...
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:43:50 UTC No. 16544605
Muskrats SEETHING. New Glenn CHADS stay winning!
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:43:59 UTC No. 16544607
can Jacklyn even sink? if it gets hit.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:44:00 UTC No. 16544608
>>16544580
What the fuck Ice Cube just showed up
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:44:26 UTC No. 16544610
Where is Jeffery?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:44:31 UTC No. 16544611
>>16544542
Yes and it will
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:44:35 UTC No. 16544612
"So you're telling me there's a chance"
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:44:44 UTC No. 16544613
>>16544598
>>16544605
oh no starship sisters...
when are we gonna go past leo?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:44:48 UTC No. 16544614
>>16544600
what was she saying? sorry, I zoned out.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:44:50 UTC No. 16544615
>payload is blue waffle technology
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:44:57 UTC No. 16544617
Blue balls
and
Blue cock ring
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:45:00 UTC No. 16544618
I am eagerly awaiting the ng wiki page to show 0/1
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:45:28 UTC No. 16544619
>>16544583
That girl isnt hispanic...
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:45:41 UTC No. 16544620
>not even a real blue ring, a pathfinder for blue ring
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:45:45 UTC No. 16544621
>>16544618
for launch or landing?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:45:46 UTC No. 16544622
>>16544583
that's a white woman
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:45:55 UTC No. 16544623
>>16544605
SHUT UUUUPPPP JUST SHUT THE FUCK UUUUUUUUUUUUUUPPPPPPPPPP
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:46:52 UTC No. 16544626
where is the banana
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:46:56 UTC No. 16544628
>>16544623
>marscuck seething
you will live in ze tube
Astranon at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:47:22 UTC No. 16544630
>>16544626
in Jeff's ass
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:47:26 UTC No. 16544631
>>16544613
high energy
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:47:36 UTC No. 16544632
Data is the currency of success, remember that. So long as they get some data, it's immediately a success
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:47:58 UTC No. 16544633
>>16544626
"its peanut butter jelly time"
haha thats just a meme i saw lol
"banana"
haha
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:48:08 UTC No. 16544635
>>16544629
Yes, amazon man does not have the blessings of lord Vishnu
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:48:16 UTC No. 16544636
>>16544628
I'm ready
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:48:37 UTC No. 16544638
>>16544628
Fuck you
>>16544633
Lol
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:48:46 UTC No. 16544639
>>16544629
SAAAAAAAAAAAAAAR
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:48:53 UTC No. 16544640
starship bros it's over
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:48:54 UTC No. 16544641
>>16544633
back to myspace boomer
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:49:08 UTC No. 16544642
>recurring BO theme of reusability
Wut
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:49:16 UTC No. 16544643
>>16544635
But Vishnu is literally blue
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:49:22 UTC No. 16544644
THE JACKLYN
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:49:25 UTC No. 16544645
Wait are there people on Jackyline (Jeff's Mom)?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:49:38 UTC No. 16544647
>>16544636
You are very creative, anon
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:49:44 UTC No. 16544648
>>16544633
I'm like 30% sure this is Elon Musk
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:49:46 UTC No. 16544649
>>16544442
>yhas qweening for your engines
I don't predict this launch going well
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:50:14 UTC No. 16544650
>>16544636
luv me 'deenz
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:50:18 UTC No. 16544651
>>16544644
why does she keep saying the Jacklyn?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:50:22 UTC No. 16544652
It's over for Elon
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:50:23 UTC No. 16544653
>>16544605
afraid this is true many are saying it
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:50:39 UTC No. 16544655
>>16544642
blue origin is the first company to fly a reusable rocket. it landed on The Jacklyn The Jacklyn The Jacklyn The Jacklyn
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:51:04 UTC No. 16544657
>>16544503
She looks like a fucking troll compared to mother shotwell
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:51:07 UTC No. 16544658
if they actually get to landing they will fuck up the barge video, 100%
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:51:15 UTC No. 16544659
>cant fucking unhear nooglin
pos name for a pos rocket
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:51:23 UTC No. 16544660
>40 minuts
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:51:24 UTC No. 16544661
>40 minutes
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:51:26 UTC No. 16544662
T-40 mins
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:51:30 UTC No. 16544663
>comparing the NS booster landing with the NG booster landing
>bring up the huge difference between the two
>say it's because NS lands on hard ground and NG lands on a boat
>no mention of orbital vs suborbital velocity and energy demands
Still with this shit, it's disgustingly disingenuous.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:51:30 UTC No. 16544664
>>16544651
the droneship is called jacklyn
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:51:37 UTC No. 16544666
t-40
I FUCKING CALLED IT>>16544471
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:51:39 UTC No. 16544667
>>16544651
idk I've never heard anyone refer to a ship like that
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:51:45 UTC No. 16544668
>>16544654
flash of orange then the feed cutting
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:51:47 UTC No. 16544669
Launch in 40 mins.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:52:01 UTC No. 16544672
>/sfg/ full of misogynists
yeah why am I fucking surprised
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:52:14 UTC No. 16544673
>>16544660
>>16544661
>>16544662
hivemind
>>16544665
>>16544666
moon posters
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:52:45 UTC No. 16544674
>>16544656
Jeff, I've come for the engines. Hand them over.
Astranon at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:52:48 UTC No. 16544675
>>16544673
took me time to find the rocketgrill
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:52:49 UTC No. 16544676
elon loaned bezos a starlink dish so the landing stream will be fine
until the spacex sniper detonates the booster before landing anyways
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:52:58 UTC No. 16544677
>https://shop.blueorigin.com/
Best to buy your Blorigin t-shirts now, they'll sell out after this successful test flight
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:53:20 UTC No. 16544678
>>16544672
SLAY GURL
GURLS IN SPACE
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:53:21 UTC No. 16544679
>>16544587
>goblina in pajamas around niggers
Looks risky
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:53:22 UTC No. 16544680
>>16544672
Because you're a newfag and should have lurked more before posting
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:53:28 UTC No. 16544682
anyone got the image of the jacklyn whore?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:53:44 UTC No. 16544683
>Tiki torches
uhhh based?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:53:48 UTC No. 16544685
>>16544626
sorry, only a normal adult woman on this flight (for scale)
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:53:51 UTC No. 16544686
>>16544677
cringe
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:53:57 UTC No. 16544687
>they're trying to be the 2nd
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:54:03 UTC No. 16544688
>>16544672
baited two chuds award
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:54:11 UTC No. 16544689
What's the difference in starship flight 6 and 7?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:54:16 UTC No. 16544690
im playing some tf2, this is boring
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:54:29 UTC No. 16544691
>>16544677
Guys............should i buy the patch?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:54:35 UTC No. 16544692
I don't want to hear about this stream being cringe after being subjected to YEARS of felons redditry
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:55:10 UTC No. 16544693
>>16544689
You're really going to bring up Starshit on Jeff's big day?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:55:13 UTC No. 16544694
>>16544689
It's bigger
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:55:36 UTC No. 16544695
Blue Origin or Blerg for short.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:55:37 UTC No. 16544696
>>16544689
the 7th comes after the 6th one
cheers
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:55:43 UTC No. 16544697
We want to hear about this stream being based after being subjected to NANOSECONDS of Elon's 4channery
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:55:52 UTC No. 16544698
>>16544688
I want to thank my grandma, my boss, and my cousin sister
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:56:11 UTC No. 16544699
I hope HOAs get angry and submit a noise complaint
Best thing they have invented
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:56:19 UTC No. 16544701
> Blue Origin Livestream
> 34k watching now
Doesn't the SpaceX stream hit the high 100ks?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:56:42 UTC No. 16544704
>>16544692
I'm going to bitch about this stream being cringe because it's soulless cringe vs Spacex's soulful cringe
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:56:45 UTC No. 16544705
>>16544677
48 bucks for international shipping
feels bad to be a poor
just a patch jeff
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:56:53 UTC No. 16544706
Will people still call it NEW GLENN in 50 years? or will they call it OLD Glonn
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:56:55 UTC No. 16544707
>>16544701
it is 1am
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:57:03 UTC No. 16544708
>>16544629
Idk I kinda appreciate that Blue is all business. Spacex is fun but the YEEHAW MANIFEST DESTINY shit has kinda gotten old for me. Spacex is currently busy becoming a telecom company that occasionally throws giant rockets into the ocean for views while Blue is coldly marching toward a vision of a space economy and doing the work to implement it.
>inb4 im a blue simp
meh
🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:57:12 UTC No. 16544709
>>16544703
I'm thinking about it, I have things to do tomorrow
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:57:14 UTC No. 16544710
>no thunderf00t live stream
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:57:20 UTC No. 16544711
>>16544701
crypto bots don't watch blue streams
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:57:38 UTC No. 16544712
>>16544703
I just woke up anon, feel like I'm tripping balls rn lol
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:58:02 UTC No. 16544713
almost made me reply
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:58:45 UTC No. 16544715
16544713
kek
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:58:46 UTC No. 16544716
>>16544714
Rim her ass please
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:59:05 UTC No. 16544717
>>16544707
huh, how you know?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:59:12 UTC No. 16544718
New Genn will make orbit before saarship. Muskrats seethe.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:59:46 UTC No. 16544720
it's 10pm
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:00:06 UTC No. 16544721
Is there a bluesky stream?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:00:20 UTC No. 16544724
Wow I can't believe New Glenn is 5.5 penii tall
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:00:21 UTC No. 16544725
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:00:26 UTC No. 16544727
what if urf used only one single time zone...
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:00:42 UTC No. 16544728
>>16544719
keeeek parasocial clearcels about to mass rope
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:00:44 UTC No. 16544729
>>16544719
NOOOOOOOOOOO
it's over. launch ruined
I hope it gets an abort now :((((
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:00:47 UTC No. 16544730
how many new shepards does it take to change a light bulb
Astranon at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:01:01 UTC No. 16544731
>>16544727
that's what Eastern is, everyone else is wrong
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:01:07 UTC No. 16544732
New Glenn is built for today's payloads
Starship is built for the future
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:01:09 UTC No. 16544733
>>16544720
shouldn't you be engulfed in flames rn
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:01:10 UTC No. 16544734
>>16544719
What the fuck is her problem? She streams SpaceX all the time?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:01:17 UTC No. 16544736
>Won't fit a New Shepherd inside the payload bay
Gay
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:01:17 UTC No. 16544737
>>16544701
I had no idea this is even happening.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:01:21 UTC No. 16544738
>>16544722
>>16544724
Thats a lotta dicks
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:01:27 UTC No. 16544739
>>16544719
Who is Ria?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:01:36 UTC No. 16544740
>>16544716
Get it in there big boy
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:01:55 UTC No. 16544742
>>16544739
my wife
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:02:01 UTC No. 16544743
>>16544719
>ria moves heaven and earth to watch starship launches
>oh, new glenn? erm sorry i have other plans on
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:02:05 UTC No. 16544744
>>16544590
>USA USA chants
Those are based though. Shame we didn't hear any when they caught the booster. Bunch of California fags.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:02:18 UTC No. 16544745
>>16544719
Failure confirmed...
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:02:25 UTC No. 16544746
>>16544708
Did you miss the part where the revenue from being a telecom company is being funneled directly into the giant rocket development? And the part where Spacex has ACTUALLY begun implementing a true space economy in the process of building that telecom network?
>Blue is coldly marching
Blue is shivering and limping toward capabilities moderately superior to a rocket that has been doing the same thing for nearly a decade.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:02:28 UTC No. 16544747
>>16544739
Lia!
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:02:32 UTC No. 16544748
>bump limit reached
gonna bake the new thread, get ready to switch
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:02:36 UTC No. 16544749
Scrub Origin in around 25 minutes
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:02:45 UTC No. 16544750
>>16544743
Holy based. I love Clear-chan now.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:02:48 UTC No. 16544751
>>16544740
yeah there's enough time before launch, I'll be right back
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:02:56 UTC No. 16544752
>>16544748
>page 5
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:02:58 UTC No. 16544753
>bimbo aroused talking about big and tall rocket
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:03:13 UTC No. 16544754
>>16544743
based. She's a honorary spacex employee at this point
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:03:24 UTC No. 16544755
Trips and it doesn't blow up
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:03:25 UTC No. 16544757
>>16544719
Fucking kill me NOW
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:03:29 UTC No. 16544758
imagine comparing this thing to saturn v
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:03:36 UTC No. 16544759
https://x.com/blueorigin/status/187
>We want to be clearabout ourobjectives. This is our first flight and we’ve prepared rigorously for it. But no amount of ground testing or mission simulations is a replacement for flying this rocket. Our key objective today is to reach orbit safely. Anything beyond that is icing on the cake. We know landing the boosteron our first try offshore in the Atlantic is ambitious—but we’re going for it. No matter what happens, we’ll learn, refine, and apply that knowledge to our next launch.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:03:37 UTC No. 16544760
>>16544719
going to bed
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:03:43 UTC No. 16544761
>>16544740
Ill put my ascent stage in her docking module iykwim
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:03:50 UTC No. 16544762
>>16544743
Common Ria W
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:03:50 UTC No. 16544763
>>16544748
don't do that please tourist
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:03:57 UTC No. 16544764
>>16544748
No launch thread parallel stage?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:04:01 UTC No. 16544765
are we ready SFG??
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:04:23 UTC No. 16544766
Sighted at least three jeets, failure guaranteed
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:04:35 UTC No. 16544767
New Glenn is honestly looking good, guys
I'm unironically positive
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:04:37 UTC No. 16544768
>nobody there but employees
no hype
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:04:40 UTC No. 16544770
>>16544765
Wouldn't miss a virgin catastrophic failure.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:04:41 UTC No. 16544771
uoooooooh TOT
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:04:45 UTC No. 16544772
>>16544765
yes
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:04:55 UTC No. 16544773
>>16544733
I cant breef
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:05:09 UTC No. 16544774
>>16544769
nkdshi
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:05:21 UTC No. 16544775
>>16544770
that's what she said
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:05:23 UTC No. 16544776
Started my goon sesh
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:05:31 UTC No. 16544777
how will spacex cope when blue origin beats starship to orbit?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:05:31 UTC No. 16544778
>>16544759
precope
meanwhile musk is like
>mars city next month would be nice, two months more likely
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:05:31 UTC No. 16544779
>>16544769
i am ready for the edit
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:05:40 UTC No. 16544780
anons please those are real children
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:05:41 UTC No. 16544781
>>16544247
some more context
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lis
>Falcon family boosters have successfully landed 395 times in 407 attempts. A total of 44 boosters have flown multiple missions, with a record of 25 missions by a booster. SpaceX has also reflown fairing halves more than 300 times, with some being reflown at least twenty times.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:05:52 UTC No. 16544782
>>16544747
wtf are you doing here Liker?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:05:55 UTC No. 16544783
>>16544740
HNNNNGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:06:08 UTC No. 16544785
>>16543091
i just woke up!! i am so excited to watch the first new glenn launch!
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:06:21 UTC No. 16544786
>>16544769
HNNNNGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:06:21 UTC No. 16544787
>>16544780
as opposed to artificial children?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:06:32 UTC No. 16544788
>>16544768
>BO uses child labor
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:06:56 UTC No. 16544789
>>16544759
If they fail this launch, the government should arrest bezos and every blorigin accomplice in this charade.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:07:28 UTC No. 16544793
>>16544785
Glad you could make it, sponge anon. Thought you were going to fall asleep this time lmao
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:07:32 UTC No. 16544794
>>16544789
if they succeed they should arrest Felon and every Muskrat
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:07:48 UTC No. 16544796
>>16544792
What does he do?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:07:51 UTC No. 16544797
>>16544785
AIIIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE BEGONE
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:08:20 UTC No. 16544798
>>16544746
Yeah and what is the only payload that that giant rocket can currently deploy? Oh yeah, more Starlink satellites. Don't get me wrong, Spacex is gonna fucking PRINT money in the next few years but I think they've kinda lost the plot.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:08:23 UTC No. 16544799
Look at those big ass monitors. Jeff spared no expense.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:08:24 UTC No. 16544800
>>16544796
Fuck
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:08:29 UTC No. 16544801
>commitment and passion for what we're doing
>he started spending TWO afternoons a week working on BO
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:08:38 UTC No. 16544802
Jeff looks very handsome
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:08:45 UTC No. 16544803
this is the greatest day in the history of spaceflight
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:08:51 UTC No. 16544804
>>16544794
regardless of what happens they should arrest >>16544786 and >>16544771
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:09:01 UTC No. 16544808
>>16544769
Why are there so many kids? Not a single child in sight watching Starship.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:09:10 UTC No. 16544811
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:09:23 UTC No. 16544812
>>16544805
Spoken like someone who doesn't use a giant ass monitor. They suck. You want a screen the size of your content and not anymore.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:09:24 UTC No. 16544813
>>16544801
>he started spending TWO afternoons a week working on BO
KEK, I still remember that
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:09:44 UTC No. 16544816
4chan user in the left with the blue shirt
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:09:51 UTC No. 16544817
>>16544809
found the early stager
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:09:53 UTC No. 16544818
I want to fuck that cutie in the front
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:09:56 UTC No. 16544819
that's a surprisingly large % of white people...
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:10:00 UTC No. 16544820
>>16544814
Is that Dennis Nedry from the hit motion picture "Jurassic Park"?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:10:01 UTC No. 16544821
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:10:11 UTC No. 16544823
>>16544808
all kids of employees
spacex never shows video of the employee watching area
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:10:19 UTC No. 16544825
>>16544814
BIG boy
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:10:23 UTC No. 16544826
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:10:42 UTC No. 16544827
>every host or commentator is a white girl
What did Jeff mean by this?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:10:44 UTC No. 16544828
>>16544816
>>16544826
kek we 4channers actually look like this
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:10:56 UTC No. 16544829
>>16544826
which one of you is that?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:11:00 UTC No. 16544830
>>16544793
i set the alarm but my ear was blocked, so i couldnt hear it for a while. gladl that there is a delay
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:11:01 UTC No. 16544831
would smash Maggie
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:11:09 UTC No. 16544832
>>16544822
>celebrating the culmination of your years of hard work is cringe
retard
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:11:17 UTC No. 16544833
>>16544827
jeff is based is what it means
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:11:25 UTC No. 16544834
>>16544827
they're the mistresses he rejected for being insufficiently mexican
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:11:25 UTC No. 16544835
she looks like she does femdom in her free time
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:11:27 UTC No. 16544836
>>16544825
>>16544826
/sfg/ is a hivemind today
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:11:33 UTC No. 16544837
>>16544796
Pretend to be Elon.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:11:35 UTC No. 16544838
i want maggie to suck my maggie
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:11:37 UTC No. 16544839
>>16544826
>>16544822
Is that The Launch Pad?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:11:37 UTC No. 16544840
>>16544810
Do you really believe it? Economy was down the shitters after 2020.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:11:42 UTC No. 16544841
>>16544822
Hate to break it to ya but space nerds are pretty cringe. The spacex streams only look different because they put the hot people in front like on Top Gear.
Apologize at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:12:06 UTC No. 16544843
Could this rocket take tourists for a moon flyby?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:12:09 UTC No. 16544844
>9m starship fairing vs 7m new glenn fairing
>starship has small ass doors while new glenn's really big
feels like new glenn is the better choice than starship honestly, the only thing starship has it going is upper stage reusability but you really cannot launch big stuff with it because the door is so small
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:12:24 UTC No. 16544847
This unironically is going to blow.
Screenshot me.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:12:27 UTC No. 16544848
>>16544826
does 90% of the work there
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:12:35 UTC No. 16544849
>>16544839
maybe
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:12:36 UTC No. 16544850
>>16544839
In a manner of speaking...
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:12:40 UTC No. 16544851
>>16544826
he looks photoshopped wtf
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:12:46 UTC No. 16544852
>>16544845
king
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:12:47 UTC No. 16544853
>>16544810
Where are all the Indians? Elon assured me they were essential for developing technology?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:12:54 UTC No. 16544854
>>16544798
What was the first development priority? Being able to deploy the satellites that will pay for the program.
Once it can reliably deploy Starlink, expect immediate development and test flights of large payload doors. Starlink is existentially necessary to scale the Starship program and therefore Mars colonization, so development resources logically get routed to the pez dispenser first.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:13:01 UTC No. 16544855
>>16544843
with what spacecraft?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:13:20 UTC No. 16544856
>>16544844
I thought you guys said Starship could remodel all of that once it's proven itself a worthy vessel?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:13:36 UTC No. 16544857
>>16544840
money was never a problem
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:13:37 UTC No. 16544858
wenhop?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:13:40 UTC No. 16544859
>>16544685
Found the banana.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:13:52 UTC No. 16544860
>>16544853
they are. blue would've reached orbit in 2005 if we'd jeetflooded harder.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:13:53 UTC No. 16544861
>>16544853
fuck you bloody bastard bitch
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:13:54 UTC No. 16544862
>>16544845
>>16544846
hivemind x2
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:14:01 UTC No. 16544863
>>16544844
New glenn is more sensible for bigger missions unironically
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:14:02 UTC No. 16544864
>>16544845
Too busy pretending to play POE2 to watch
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:14:12 UTC No. 16544865
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:14:39 UTC No. 16544867
>>16544859
this is either a joke about futas or masturbation
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:14:46 UTC No. 16544868
>>16544812
>what are windowed programs
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:14:52 UTC No. 16544869
we're gonna be scrubbin' all night
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:14:58 UTC No. 16544870
>>16544865
*37 kek
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:14:59 UTC No. 16544871
FUCK
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:15:02 UTC No. 16544872
>COUNTDOWN DELETED
HAHAHAHAHAHAH SCRUB
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:15:12 UTC No. 16544873
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:15:13 UTC No. 16544874
>>16544865
disregard
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:15:22 UTC No. 16544876
>>16544866
>that pic
Evangelion vibes
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:15:27 UTC No. 16544877
welp. lookin like im edging for another 45 minutes
Apologize at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:15:37 UTC No. 16544879
>>16544855
Dragon
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:15:43 UTC No. 16544881
why does fueling take so long
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:16:00 UTC No. 16544883
alright, goodnight anons
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:16:01 UTC No. 16544884
Hope they have more b-roll ready
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:16:15 UTC No. 16544885
>>16544881
its already fueled tho
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:16:15 UTC No. 16544886
Sorry folks, leaky hydrogen valve on the second stage. If we don't resolve it within the next five minutes, you can go to bed.
-Bloke
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:16:18 UTC No. 16544887
>delay
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:16:22 UTC No. 16544888
>>16544880
I still see it on the YT stream.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:16:29 UTC No. 16544891
>T-19
>go to brew tea
>come back
>T-36
huh??
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:16:36 UTC No. 16544892
That's it, I'm going to sleep.
They had to do it right before the day I gotta wake up early to go to the doctor
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:16:44 UTC No. 16544893
>3 hour launch window
I always thought these were tight, but this seems wide.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:16:50 UTC No. 16544894
Anyone wanna get marrieed
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:17:09 UTC No. 16544895
>>16544894
desperately
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:17:27 UTC No. 16544896
My Starship would NEVER be delayed
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:17:30 UTC No. 16544897
>>16544894
thats gay
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:17:30 UTC No. 16544898
>>16544882
This means that my pizza will be delivered before the launch.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:17:43 UTC No. 16544900
>>16544826
BIGGER!
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:17:43 UTC No. 16544901
>>16544840
Well yeah. Blue was founded more than a year before Spacex.
If Jeff really cared, he would have been active in it and pushing to get orbital launch capability instead of letting the company rot for 15 years. Meanwhile, in about the same timeframe, Spacex went from 0 to dominating the global launch market so completely that they had to start expanding the market itself to meet their own cadence.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:17:45 UTC No. 16544902
Nig-1
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:17:56 UTC No. 16544903
>>16544894
girls don't like space at all :(
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:18:10 UTC No. 16544904
>>16544894
yeah, Clear. To Me.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:18:28 UTC No. 16544906
>>16544893
Funny, I said the same thing about the first asian girl I fucked in college.
They're not going into SSO or trying to insert into a specific orbital "slot" so they can go whenever they feel like it.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:18:32 UTC No. 16544907
>>16544898
I made tacos :3
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:18:33 UTC No. 16544908
I can't fucking wait for Starship Flight 7. How about you guys?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:18:38 UTC No. 16544909
Apologize at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:18:40 UTC No. 16544910
>>16544905
What does NG stand for?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:19:09 UTC No. 16544911
>>16544908
i'm hoping it can be pushed back a couple more days so i can go
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:19:10 UTC No. 16544912
>>16544910
Natural Gas
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:19:16 UTC No. 16544914
>>16544891
First maiden launch? Buckle up, we're here for a while.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:19:21 UTC No. 16544916
>>16544909
kek
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:19:29 UTC No. 16544917
>>16544903
astrology
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:19:45 UTC No. 16544918
>>16544910
Not gonna (launch)
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:20:00 UTC No. 16544919
>>16544892
>wake up early to go to the doctor
good luck anon!
>>16544902
kek
Apologize at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:20:04 UTC No. 16544920
>>16544908
>Flight 7
literally the same shit as all the other ones. The real deal will be Flight 8 because of Starship's tower catch
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:20:09 UTC No. 16544921
Have we heard anything from the flight director loop this whole time? This is too sanitized Mr. Clean.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:20:17 UTC No. 16544922
>>16544910
No Good-1.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:20:20 UTC No. 16544923
>>16544917
I've been saying some astrology nonsense is the way to get women on Mars
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:20:31 UTC No. 16544924
Where is The Jack Lyn?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:20:41 UTC No. 16544926
when will starship reach orbit
new glenn's doing it today
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:21:11 UTC No. 16544927
>>16544913
>official patch depicts racial minorities trapped in the trench getting plumed to death
blue can't keep getting away with this
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:21:20 UTC No. 16544928
>AYO DENISE
>SHOW THESE NIGGA HOW WE DO THANGS AT BLORG
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:21:20 UTC No. 16544929
>>16544923
nah the Indigenous sacred lands shiet is gonna get them first
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:21:25 UTC No. 16544930
>>16544923
What are the benefits of Earth being in retrograde?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:21:54 UTC No. 16544931
>>16544917
tried it, didn't work
>"oh you like stars? that's the orion constellation up there, did you know that Betelgeuse could go supernova in any moment and it'll be as bright as a full moon?"
>"leave me alone, weirdo"
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:22:26 UTC No. 16544932
>>16544924
She's getting ready to receive Jeff's fat, girthy, shiny, veiny, throbbing, rumbling, jerking rocket
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:22:28 UTC No. 16544933
>>16544913
Why does the have to be niggers in everything?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:22:32 UTC No. 16544934
>>16544931
>astrology
>talks about astronomy
It's simple, moron.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:22:44 UTC No. 16544935
new puzzle while we wait
https://jiggie.fun/EceaU1
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:22:45 UTC No. 16544936
>>16544931
keek thats what you get for being an autistic sperg
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:22:55 UTC No. 16544938
>>16544910
New Guinea
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:23:09 UTC No. 16544939
>>16544931
that's not astrology dumbass. tell her how jupiter's position means she should have sex with you.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:23:26 UTC No. 16544940
>>16544933
that's what the NG in NG-1 stands for.
jeff bezos at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:23:34 UTC No. 16544941
real jeff bezos here, AMA
Apologize at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:23:34 UTC No. 16544942
Millennial anons.... will we ever be able to afford a trip around the moon?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:23:35 UTC No. 16544943
>>16544933
Space is for everyone, anon
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:23:38 UTC No. 16544944
>>16544910
No Gann
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:24:09 UTC No. 16544945
I can't say much but there's a reason why they're delaying this and why the commentator keeps saying shit like "our ONLY goal is to get to space". No one is confident in this piece of shit, Bezos will be BTFO'd.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:25:09 UTC No. 16544946
>>16544941
can you send me One Gorrilian Dollars, faggot?
Apologize at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:25:13 UTC No. 16544947
>>16544941
what are your thoughts on Starship's design? Do you think it will succeed? What will Blue Origin's competition look like?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:25:35 UTC No. 16544949
I WANT this to blow up because it would be funny.
I HOPE this goes flawlessly so that Spacex finally has something approaching a competitor.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:25:38 UTC No. 16544950
so Blue Ring is AWS for satellites?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:25:52 UTC No. 16544951
If this thing blows up halfway there I'm going to laugh a lot
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:25:56 UTC No. 16544953
>>16544898
I hope they still charge you the '95 price, John
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:26:00 UTC No. 16544954
>>16544663
There simply is no connection between the real engineering and the obligatory PR stunt that is launch streams. Nobody who knows shit about rocketry is going to have "communications" in their job title.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:26:07 UTC No. 16544955
>>16544941
Can you get it up?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:26:43 UTC No. 16544958
Blue Ring sounds like some sort of disease
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:26:49 UTC No. 16544959
>>16544941
Kuiper is run like a sweatshop and I hated every moment working there. I felt like a slave working for Starlink too but at least we got shit done.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:26:51 UTC No. 16544960
>>16544953
>John
Wrong continent, but thank you.
jeff bezos at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:26:53 UTC No. 16544961
>>16544946
check your inbox
>>16544947
it is gay and spacex will be bankrupt after this presidency ends
>>16544955
no
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:26:54 UTC No. 16544962
>boats
lol every fucking time
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:27:01 UTC No. 16544963
>>16544956
fuck... They are, aren't they?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:27:10 UTC No. 16544964
Blue Ring is such a gay-ass name, who tf came up with this lmao
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:27:32 UTC No. 16544965
>>16544964
Blue Cock Ring
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:27:40 UTC No. 16544966
>>16544931
Have you tried the black science man way and waxing poetic about we are a way for the universe to know itself, star stuff, your eyes reminding me of a stellar nursery etc.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:27:44 UTC No. 16544967
>>16544913
If they stick the landing I'll buy something from the shop
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:28:15 UTC No. 16544968
>>16544949
>>16544951
The result doesn't really matter to me, I'm gonna laugh my ass off anyways with this general. Doomposting, gaanposting, it all works.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:28:22 UTC No. 16544969
>>16544959
What org?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:28:24 UTC No. 16544970
>shoutout to our jewish overlords
Apologize at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:28:34 UTC No. 16544971
>>16544962
> jewish boats ruining our party
every
fucking
time
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:28:58 UTC No. 16544974
Do they call the reentry phase of flight NG-R?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:29:13 UTC No. 16544975
>>16544959
How the fuck can you run like a sweatshop if you don't produce anything?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:29:37 UTC No. 16544976
>>16544940
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uxx
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:29:57 UTC No. 16544978
>>16544969
Which company? and you first.
Jeff Bezos at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:30:03 UTC No. 16544979
>>16544974
Not gonna return (in one piece)
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:30:14 UTC No. 16544981
>>16544826
>>16544839
He would've been the mass simulator if Blue Ring wasn't ready in time.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:31:12 UTC No. 16544983
>>16544981
kek almost made me spill my tea
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:31:31 UTC No. 16544984
>>16544974
If it landed back to launch site it would be called
New Glenn Ground Return or NGGR
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:31:39 UTC No. 16544985
>>16544972
Would be cool if if it was like that paint on mugs that changes color and reveals the graphic when the mug gets hot. Except in this case the American flag would show up when the booster gets cold.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:31:54 UTC No. 16544986
>>16544949
I want BO to achieve a huge amount of success and be a serious competitor to Spacex so that leftists who like space (they do actually exist) can rally behind the company because it's not associated with Musk, and subsequently suffer the cognitive dissonance of supporting a Bezos endeavor.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:32:21 UTC No. 16544988
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:32:40 UTC No. 16544990
>laura manginis
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:32:53 UTC No. 16544991
Why are there only women?
Oh wait that's not a woman O.O
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:33:00 UTC No. 16544993
>>16544987
>2025
>I am irrelevant
ftfy, snake.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:33:22 UTC No. 16544994
>>16544975
They have no fucking idea what they're doing and the sat design is fucked so they just work people into the ground to build like barely any sats. I wish I could talk about it more. It's hopeless.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:33:26 UTC No. 16544995
so uhhh, the raw material come in and we put them together, we make aft parts, we make fairings, uhh, and um, we assemble them, uhh, prior to launch
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:33:33 UTC No. 16544996
>another delay in 3...2...
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:34:03 UTC No. 16544997
ANOTHER
DELAY
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:34:14 UTC No. 16544998
They doing a Molniya orbit?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:34:16 UTC No. 16544999
New Glenn Ground (Earth) Return
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:34:19 UTC No. 16545000
>>16544987
ULA is legitimately going to be liquidated before the end of the decade
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:34:26 UTC No. 16545001
I LOOKED AWAY FOR 5 SECONDS
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:34:30 UTC No. 16545002
FUCK
ME
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:34:43 UTC No. 16545003
>>16545001
KEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEK
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:34:51 UTC No. 16545004
so tired of listening to women talk
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:34:54 UTC No. 16545005
Damn, I'll have to reheat my pizza for the launch.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:35:10 UTC No. 16545007
>>16544996
damn I posted it right before the timer changed
I'm getting good at this
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:35:23 UTC No. 16545008
these fucking people
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:35:44 UTC No. 16545010
>>16545004
This desu. Where are all the guys (male)?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:35:45 UTC No. 16545012
Jeff please, I have work tomorrow
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:36:04 UTC No. 16545015
when SLS gets cancelled just think of how many ex-nasa spokesholes are gonna be on the market for blue to snatch up
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:36:15 UTC No. 16545016
>>16545006
We've been trying to reach you, if you can read this please wake up, we miss you
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:36:48 UTC No. 16545018
>>16544992
I'm a man and I think I unironically have a more feminine shoulder:waist:hip layout, but I need to put on more hip and ass muscle because I'm a skeleton
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:36:59 UTC No. 16545019
>SpaceX: 395 rocket landings
>Rest of the world combined: 0
That last number is finally going to change, after 10 years... let that sink in
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:37:16 UTC No. 16545020
>>16544854
What, did all of that apartheid emerald mine money run out?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:37:38 UTC No. 16545021
I feel bad for the host, they just have to keep coming up with stuff to talk about as the clock just keeps going back to T-30
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:37:40 UTC No. 16545022
>>16545019
>That last number is finally going to change
not at this rate
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:37:57 UTC No. 16545023
When the 20 minute countdown ends, the next 20 minute countdown starts
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:38:00 UTC No. 16545024
>>16545019
>Rest of the world combined: 0 (1 attempted)
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:38:09 UTC No. 16545025
Finally a nice relaxing AI voice
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:38:16 UTC No. 16545026
>>16544992
I like the Vogue photo-shoot they did
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:38:31 UTC No. 16545027
>>16545020
Braindead comment
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:38:42 UTC No. 16545028
>>16545019
I hope they scrub tonight so that SpaceX can reach 400 first.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:38:44 UTC No. 16545029
>>16545025
Was just gonna say. This is clearly AI.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:38:46 UTC No. 16545030
>>16545021
Why don't they inform us on what is delaying the launch?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:38:52 UTC No. 16545031
>>16545021
frankly I'd rather they shut up and just show the rocket until the inevitable scrub
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:39:01 UTC No. 16545032
>see delayed to t-40 mins
>go away a bit to make some food
>come back an hour later
>its another t-40 mins
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:39:33 UTC No. 16545035
>>16545026
damn she's a big mouth bass
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:39:50 UTC No. 16545036
>>16545021
Why not have the launch net on? Some music maybe? Instead of just dead silence
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:40:04 UTC No. 16545037
>>16545032
based black hole poster
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:40:07 UTC No. 16545038
>>16545035
have to be to handle Jeff
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:40:11 UTC No. 16545039
>>16545029
I guess they couldn't find any men to voice it so they had to use AI
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:40:31 UTC No. 16545040
>>16545032
Step by step, ferociously
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:40:51 UTC No. 16545041
>>16545026
She's more muscular than me
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:41:22 UTC No. 16545044
>>16545026
who's that man
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:41:36 UTC No. 16545045
>>16545035
Her mouth was not that big in her earlier career
Jeff did that
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:41:36 UTC No. 16545046
number of 7-meter fairing launch scrubs (rest of the world): 0
number of 7-meter fairing launch scrubs (blue origin): 1
are the rest of you guys even trying?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:42:07 UTC No. 16545047
>>16544998
Similar but no, inclination is ~30 degrees instead of 67.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:42:19 UTC No. 16545048
>>16544487
cool
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:42:33 UTC No. 16545049
imagine it just fucking exploded right now
haha
would be so funny
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:43:24 UTC No. 16545050
clear knew what she was doing when she skipped out on this bullshit
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:43:28 UTC No. 16545051
Lost track of the time playing monster hunter, I guess I didn't miss anything.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:43:35 UTC No. 16545052
>>16545049
don't bother tuning in until T-5 chads would be in shambles, nothing ever happens bros would mald
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:44:17 UTC No. 16545054
>raw rocket noises
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:45:02 UTC No. 16545056
>>16545054
Much better than listening to those harpies bray like mules
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:45:12 UTC No. 16545057
What do you guys think would be the funniest scenario? RUD and kino fireworks during liftoff, after clearing the tower, max-q, meco, or during landing?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:45:17 UTC No. 16545059
>>16545014
nah chat this be an XQCL frrr dud
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:45:45 UTC No. 16545061
>>16545053
man those booster fins make me rock hard
I don't know what it is about them but they're so fucking cool
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:45:49 UTC No. 16545062
>>16545057
There is another option.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:45:51 UTC No. 16545063
>>16545049
>This is for Amos, Jeffery
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:45:56 UTC No. 16545064
>>16545057
High velocity impact into Jacklyn, sinking the ship
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:46:32 UTC No. 16545065
>>16545057
turning back around and flying into the command center
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:46:40 UTC No. 16545066
>>16544601
its the film on the other screen
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:46:51 UTC No. 16545067
>>16545061
they look like some procedural wings i'd make in rp1 because i was too lazy to make something that looked good
Apologize at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:46:52 UTC No. 16545068
>>16545057
total drone ship annihilation would be the funniest
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:46:55 UTC No. 16545069
>>16545062
Only works on small rockets since an explosion would go bigger than just rip off a fuel line at the ass end.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:47:03 UTC No. 16545070
>>16545057
100% success, lands dead center, waterfall development vindicated, oldspace supremacy, gratitude ferrero roche
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:47:12 UTC No. 16545071
>>16545057
A perfect launch and landing
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:47:41 UTC No. 16545073
>>16545067
but they do look good...
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:48:15 UTC No. 16545074
>>16544708
you are retarded
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:48:22 UTC No. 16545075
>>16545057
>we're standing down for tonight
>blows up on pad 10 seconds later
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:48:34 UTC No. 16545076
THERMAL INFRARED UPSKIRT
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:48:36 UTC No. 16545078
>>16545057
after liftoff, just like that time with that Antares rocket back in 2014
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MZ0
It would carpet bomb the hell out of the launchpad, would set them back years lmao
Apologize at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:48:40 UTC No. 16545079
Is Elongated Muskrat watching this while crying for being exposed in video game fraud?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:48:42 UTC No. 16545080
>upskirt shot
L-LEWD
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:49:11 UTC No. 16545081
>>16545076
>>16545077
So lewd!
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:49:18 UTC No. 16545083
>>16544935
We did it.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:49:32 UTC No. 16545084
>>16545053
Nothing ever happens.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:49:36 UTC No. 16545085
>>16545079
I don't fucking get why he felt the need to boost his ego with that shit.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:49:39 UTC No. 16545086
>>16545079
trying to imagine the person who was fine with Musk up until now but playing on a bought PoE account was the final straw
Adrian Dittmansru4s6s at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:49:41 UTC No. 16545087
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:49:47 UTC No. 16545088
>>16544935
Good job bros
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:50:00 UTC No. 16545089
>>16545077
Thats a pretty young rocket you are taking pictures of pal.
Apologize at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:50:08 UTC No. 16545090
>>16545077
did NG-chan consent to this??
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:50:30 UTC No. 16545091
>>16545074
nah thats u
Astranon at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:50:33 UTC No. 16545092
>>16545069
That wasn't started by an explosion, the cause was a QD arm not Ding Q enough, which killed the fuel line.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:50:34 UTC No. 16545093
>>16545057
I want them to make it to orbit so probably some mishap with the landing. We've never seen a rocket impact a drone ship with no landing burn before so probably that. Bonus points if it punches a nooglin shaped hole in the landing ship
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:50:49 UTC No. 16545094
SCRUB
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:51:02 UTC No. 16545095
>>16545078
>OH THE HUMANITY
God I hate journalists
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:51:10 UTC No. 16545096
>>16545089
charge parity cops?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:51:25 UTC No. 16545097
>>16545085
>could have posted lewd photos of raptor v3 and no one could gainsay him
>instead be an autist on live streaming services
such is life
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:51:34 UTC No. 16545098
>the energy is high
uhh...
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:51:44 UTC No. 16545099
>>16545095
lmao i bet u he thought it was manned
Apologize at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:51:47 UTC No. 16545100
>>16545085
he literally thinks we live in a simulation and he's the main character (I'm not even kidding)
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:51:49 UTC No. 16545101
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:52:14 UTC No. 16545102
>Mr Dyke
lole
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:52:26 UTC No. 16545103
>the glenn is new
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:52:34 UTC No. 16545104
This is worse than Starship's scrubs.
SpaceX usually don't string us along for too long when it comes to Starship.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:52:44 UTC No. 16545105
>>16545100
he's right
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:53:19 UTC No. 16545106
>>16545097
>>16545100
I get the whole fucking "I'm rich and I don't have time to grind" aspect, but even a sperg like me would know better than to boast about it.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:53:24 UTC No. 16545107
Mr Dick
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:53:36 UTC No. 16545110
>ben dyke
>anne dick
you can't make this up
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:53:52 UTC No. 16545111
>>16545085
the gamer has surpassed the older hollywood celebrity as the identity of salience in american culture. elon needs to be a gamer above all else.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:54:04 UTC No. 16545113
>>16545110
aren't both british
Apologize at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:54:17 UTC No. 16545114
>>16545105
except for the fact that I'm the main character. Everyone else are just soulless NPCs
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:54:54 UTC No. 16545115
why is she pregnant
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:54:55 UTC No. 16545116
>>16545111
He should put in a bit more effort then, because I noticed he didn't know shit about PoE from the first monk video he posted, not the stream that outed him as a complete tool.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:55:05 UTC No. 16545117
>>16545114
mom said it's my turn to be the main character
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:55:07 UTC No. 16545118
>Me GAAAAAAAAAAAN
can't make this shit up
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:55:08 UTC No. 16545119
>>16545115
crew ISRU
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:55:10 UTC No. 16545120
They scrubbed an hour ago, this is basically just a rehearsal for the streaming team for the next attempt.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:55:22 UTC No. 16545121
>>16545088
>>16544935
That was pretty fun desu. I'd enjoy doing that with /sfg/ lads and talkin roggets.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:55:30 UTC No. 16545122
>>16545115
Mormon presumably
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:55:32 UTC No. 16545123
imagine working for a gurl boss
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:55:51 UTC No. 16545124
>>16544935
The reversed head and tail was funny.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:55:55 UTC No. 16545125
>>16545119
fucking kek
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:56:11 UTC No. 16545126
>>16545121
Join the Discord
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:56:17 UTC No. 16545127
>>16545115
>Megan Lewis
>Sr. Manager, Vehicle Fluids
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:56:18 UTC No. 16545128
Standing by for the T-10 minute clock reset.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:56:30 UTC No. 16545129
starship payload volume is not as usable as new glenn's because new glenn has bigger doors
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:56:31 UTC No. 16545130
Take notes musky this is how you get into orbit
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:56:51 UTC No. 16545131
I stayed up till 1 AM for this shit, they better not scrub
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:56:57 UTC No. 16545132
we have entered into a planned scrub at t-10
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:57:07 UTC No. 16545133
>>16545115
100% she's going to give birth at a critical moment.
It's like what happens in movies.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:57:12 UTC No. 16545134
DEI woke nonsense will kill Nooglin
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:57:14 UTC No. 16545135
>>16545129
we're no where near the final version of startship
who knows what the final version payload setup will look like
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:57:35 UTC No. 16545137
>>16545057
either an Astra or a Proton situation. Failure of range safety combined with guidance would be kino.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:57:44 UTC No. 16545138
>>16545133
dubs confirm the t=0 explosion birth
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:58:05 UTC No. 16545139
>The thread is now a sticky
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:58:15 UTC No. 16545140
NOOOO
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:58:15 UTC No. 16545141
>adrian drittman jumps in the thread to shill starship instead of using falcon heavy for mars like he should have 6 years ago
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:58:25 UTC No. 16545142
t-30
fuck off
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:58:31 UTC No. 16545144
AAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHH
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:58:31 UTC No. 16545145
lmao
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:58:45 UTC No. 16545146
>sticky
it's fucking over
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:58:49 UTC No. 16545147
>>16545005
The motherfuckers working at the pizzeria forgot the Italian spices again. I called them and arranged a free replacement pizza. Looks like no launch pizza for me.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:58:53 UTC No. 16545148
100% scrub
I'm going to sleep
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:58:56 UTC No. 16545149
>Another delay
>sticky
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:59:04 UTC No. 16545150
scrubbed
delays on delays
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:59:09 UTC No. 16545153
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:59:10 UTC No. 16545154
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Apologize at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:59:14 UTC No. 16545155
NOOOOOOOOO FUUUUUUCK
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:59:15 UTC No. 16545156
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:59:17 UTC No. 16545157
somebody scrub my balls
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:59:21 UTC No. 16545158
lmao
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:59:27 UTC No. 16545159
God dammit I'm going to bed.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:59:34 UTC No. 16545160
are you serious
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:59:45 UTC No. 16545163
FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:59:56 UTC No. 16545164
>>16545136
Same. I also hate the Chinese, but applaud their spacefaring efforts.
But not India. Total Jeet Death.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:59:59 UTC No. 16545165
This is literally because of the sticky, by the way.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:00:01 UTC No. 16545166
>sticky
>for a scrub
ohnononono
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:00:05 UTC No. 16545167
Just call it for the day, BO.
This is getting ridiculous.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:00:08 UTC No. 16545168
>>16545157
Present them
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:00:08 UTC No. 16545169
STOP THE COUNT
I need to sleep ffs
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:00:09 UTC No. 16545170
Launch Dysfunction
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:00:16 UTC No. 16545171
>>16545157
You got it, pard
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:00:16 UTC No. 16545172
>RESET THE CLOCK
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:00:28 UTC No. 16545173
>>16545162
Bezos is just edging at this point.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:00:33 UTC No. 16545174
ULA sniper if you're reading this put new glenn out of its misery
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:00:36 UTC No. 16545175
i called in sick for nothing
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:00:37 UTC No. 16545176
you know, f9 used to be like this. thus this meme I made eons ago >>16545171
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:00:47 UTC No. 16545177
>sticky
>in my esefgee
it's over, waves of tourists for this week
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:00:51 UTC No. 16545178
STOP THE COUNT
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:01:09 UTC No. 16545179
>>16545058
stfu berger
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:01:12 UTC No. 16545180
the little girls are back!
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:01:32 UTC No. 16545182
>step away to piss before passing out
>another delay
lmao gnight yall I'll catch the replay if anything happens
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:01:43 UTC No. 16545184
>>16545151
already downed all my snacks for this evening fml
guess Ill pull out my laptop and watch this shit in bed
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:01:47 UTC No. 16545186
I give up. tell me it exploded tomorrow.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:01:59 UTC No. 16545187
New puzzle?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:02:08 UTC No. 16545188
Blue Balls, not Blue Origin
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:02:12 UTC No. 16545189
ooh la la
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:02:29 UTC No. 16545192
Just push the god damn button already.
Hire me for fuck's sake I'll push the button for you without a second thought.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:02:31 UTC No. 16545193
>>16545151
wow i wonder if she sang a controversial song back in the day haha
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:02:35 UTC No. 16545194
>and what are you looking forward to, 8-year-old loli?
>something to fucking happen
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:02:35 UTC No. 16545195
>for the rocket to go up in space
This is cruel
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:03:01 UTC No. 16545197
>>16545134
yeah probs
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:03:05 UTC No. 16545198
>it takes years to build these rockets
and even longer to launch them, apparently
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:03:05 UTC No. 16545199
somebody post the rocket equation
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:03:13 UTC No. 16545200
>>16545191
>third
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:03:13 UTC No. 16545201
That girl will cry when she realizes it's not lifting off
Apologize at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:03:33 UTC No. 16545202
what are Thunderf00t's thoughts on Blue Origin?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:03:37 UTC No. 16545203
for fucks sake jeff, it's 3pm in australia i can't fucking stay up all night for this
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:03:38 UTC No. 16545204
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:03:43 UTC No. 16545205
>>16545194
>>16545195
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
fuckng owned
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:03:46 UTC No. 16545206
Why do Americans speak so weirdly. It's "new" not "noo". Like the sound a plane makes "nnneewww"
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:04:09 UTC No. 16545207
>>16545201
damn brat will need correcting ToT
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:04:14 UTC No. 16545208
i would disown my father and grandfather if they had worked on this shit
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:04:16 UTC No. 16545209
>>16545204
don't forget + AI
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:04:16 UTC No. 16545210
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:04:24 UTC No. 16545211
nugg lin
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:04:27 UTC No. 16545212
>>16545199
>>16545204
Some one derive the rocket equation
Hard Mode: closed book
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:04:36 UTC No. 16545213
>>16545206
Yeah, but you sound like a nerd if you say new like that.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:04:41 UTC No. 16545215
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:04:42 UTC No. 16545216
>>16544790
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V6E
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:04:43 UTC No. 16545217
>>16545206
Neo Glenn is so much cooler name
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:05:10 UTC No. 16545218
>>16545206
maybe on planet retard
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:05:34 UTC No. 16545219
3rd or 4th delay?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:05:34 UTC No. 16545220
>>16545218
guess where you are
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:06:04 UTC No. 16545221
>>16545206
Do you have license to watch this rocket launch, Nigel?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:06:13 UTC No. 16545222
>>16545204
Reset the clock one more time
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:06:16 UTC No. 16545223
>>16545204
Faciting
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:06:23 UTC No. 16545224
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:06:33 UTC No. 16545225
New England
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:06:51 UTC No. 16545226
>>16545215
look at him go
Apologize at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:06:57 UTC No. 16545227
Why did the jews shut down Zambia's space program?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M9D
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:06:59 UTC No. 16545228
Of all the launches I've worked at my time on the Cape BO is the most clueless fucking provider yet. Use a goddamn hold if you can't figure out if you're sure you're ready...
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:07:04 UTC No. 16545229
>>16545219
pretty sure it's the 4th
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:07:20 UTC No. 16545230
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NjO
this sketchy live stream has more viewers than BO, Dodd, Spaceflight Now, and NSF combined wtf
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:07:41 UTC No. 16545231
made it through the weather check again
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:07:56 UTC No. 16545233
That was the last time they are going to add time right?
Right?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:07:57 UTC No. 16545234
>>16545228
Are you our man on the inside?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:08:15 UTC No. 16545235
>>16545230
sometimes the views are botted to get it to people's home feeds
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:08:23 UTC No. 16545236
UOOOOOH EROTIC ToT
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:08:29 UTC No. 16545237
>bump limit reached
new thread then?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:08:37 UTC No. 16545239
>>16545199
>>16545215
>>16545204
what's the best alternative to this?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:08:44 UTC No. 16545240
>>16545230
Good morning saar
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:08:55 UTC No. 16545241
>>16545229
How many left in the launch window?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:09:19 UTC No. 16545243
>>16545199
>>16545204
>how far you can go = engine efficiency * what percentage of the rocket is fuel
it's simply that simple
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:09:26 UTC No. 16545244
>>16545242
what does she smell like under there
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:09:33 UTC No. 16545245
>>16545234
I ain't got a line to Bezos. If I did I'd tell him to stop fucking around.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:09:33 UTC No. 16545246
>>16545239
Ideally, a wormhole.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:09:34 UTC No. 16545247
>>16545239
electrogravitics
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:09:46 UTC No. 16545248
>>16545237
we pinned
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:10:07 UTC No. 16545249
>>16545230
It says right there that it's Musk's official YouTube account. Seems legit.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:10:08 UTC No. 16545250
>>16545241
>4 scrubs in an hour
8 more to go
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:10:11 UTC No. 16545251
>>16545242
>NG-chan will never sit on your face
why live
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:10:13 UTC No. 16545252
>>16545187
New puzzle
https://jiggie.fun/2JFLzH
https://jiggie.fun/2JFLzH
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:10:22 UTC No. 16545253
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:10:50 UTC No. 16545255
[math]\frac{V}{c} = WF^{\left[\left(\frac{10}{3}+a(-\ln
Where a is the subspace field density, n is the electromagnetic flux, and f1 and f2 are the Cochrane refraction and reflection indexes respectively. Under ideal conditions values of a = 0.00264320, n = 2.87926700, f1 = 0.06274120 and f2 = 0.32574600 can be expected within a "normal" area of deep interstellar space.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:10:51 UTC No. 16545256
>pinning a regular thread
Well fuck here comes the next batch of schizo tourists.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:11:02 UTC No. 16545257
>>16545239
Gate spells
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:11:16 UTC No. 16545258
>>16545187
https://jiggie.fun/fJ4Ya3
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:11:23 UTC No. 16545259
oh great the puzzle guys have arrived
i remember you assholes form /v/
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:11:29 UTC No. 16545260
>>16545233
>clueless
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:11:32 UTC No. 16545261
ah yes
The Nimitz unit of energy
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:11:42 UTC No. 16545262
>>16545256
no point making a launch thread for something that won't launch
keeps the splitters away
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:11:57 UTC No. 16545264
>>16545250
It seems like they're running the clock down to each "green light" checkpoint as a dry run and then setting the clock back 20osh minutes and doing it for real the second time. It might be intentional. Just a thought.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:11:57 UTC No. 16545265
>first oxidizer-rich staged combustion
Thank Elon for jumping all the way to FFSC just to leave a first for you.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:12:15 UTC No. 16545266
>>16545257
elaborate
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:12:20 UTC No. 16545268
>>16545239
Realistically, there isn't. You just raise Ve to near lightspeed using nuclear fusion.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:12:23 UTC No. 16545269
>>16545239
nuclear bombs
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:12:26 UTC No. 16545271
>>16545263
>suborbital
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:13:04 UTC No. 16545272
>>16545269
wait never mind this still obeys the rocket equation
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:13:08 UTC No. 16545273
>>16545256
nobody is coming to sci for a BO launch at 2 am lol
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:13:19 UTC No. 16545274
>T-0:35:00
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:13:30 UTC No. 16545275
>>16545269
Orion literally works on the same principle
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:13:31 UTC No. 16545276
:O
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:13:41 UTC No. 16545279
New Glenn will not launch until I get my fucking pizza.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:13:43 UTC No. 16545280
>>16545270
AHHHHHHHHHH
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:13:44 UTC No. 16545281
NEW DELAY
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:13:47 UTC No. 16545282
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA FUCK YOU JEFF
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:13:49 UTC No. 16545283
>RESET THE CLOCK
>AGAIN
Blue Ball Scrub.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:14:03 UTC No. 16545284
RESET THE CLOCK
>RESET THE CLOCK
RESET THE CLOCK
>RESET THE CLOCK
RESET THE CLOCK
>RESET THE CLOCK
RESET THE CLOCK
>RESET THE CLOCK
RESET THE CLOCK
>RESET THE CLOCK
RESET THE CLOCK
>RESET THE CLOCK
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:14:06 UTC No. 16545285
FUCK BO
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:14:13 UTC No. 16545287
Should I just go to bed...
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:14:38 UTC No. 16545293
AIIIIIIEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:14:39 UTC No. 16545294
I'm gonna cum.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:14:43 UTC No. 16545296
more like boo origin
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:14:49 UTC No. 16545297
>>16545288
AAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:14:50 UTC No. 16545298
Gradatim Ferociously yourself back to the VAB, baldy.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:15:03 UTC No. 16545299
sorry guys I pressed the reset button by accident.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:15:06 UTC No. 16545300
space is fake and gay
have sex
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:15:09 UTC No. 16545302
It's Joever.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:15:37 UTC No. 16545303
>>16545300
t.witter
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:15:39 UTC No. 16545304
They are gonna keep resetting the clock all the way until Wednesday so that Starship launches first
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:15:44 UTC No. 16545306
>>16545255
hah, nerd
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:15:50 UTC No. 16545307
>>16545295
I'm not expecting it to launch, period.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:16:06 UTC No. 16545308
>>16545300
Space is real!
Goon and watch launches!
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:16:07 UTC No. 16545309
>>16545253
>>16545260
Fuck you guys :( I'm sleepy
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:16:35 UTC No. 16545310
did they run out of shit to say
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:16:58 UTC No. 16545312
I went to work thinking I'd get to watch a replay on my break. Was surprised to see it still hadn't launched over an hour later.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:17:28 UTC No. 16545314
>>16545300
Go back /pol/nigger.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:17:31 UTC No. 16545315
>>16545310
god I hope. I just want to sit in silence. Not in the mood for listening to women
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:17:34 UTC No. 16545316
>>16545309
Funny thing, I'm only awake at this hour because my afternoon nap.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:17:54 UTC No. 16545317
>>16545300
you can take away my new glenn launch. you can take away my usui clear stream. you can take away my very posting privileges. but there is one thing you can never take away from me: my virginity.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:18:12 UTC No. 16545318
>>16545316
kek same, finally my sleep disorders are useful for once
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:18:32 UTC No. 16545320
>>16545312
>Was surprised to see it still hadn't launched over an hour later
you must be new
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:18:34 UTC No. 16545321
>>16545271
Still farther than Jeff's big rocket has been so far.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:18:35 UTC No. 16545322
I have work today in 5 hours
I can do it
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:18:43 UTC No. 16545323
good puzzle lads
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:18:46 UTC No. 16545324
They found a serious fault somewhere and the engineers are scrambling to get it fixed, aren't they?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:18:50 UTC No. 16545325
Well done team
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:18:57 UTC No. 16545326
can the technoarchs or whatever the hell they call themselves just send a drone to peacefully just eliminate me in my sleep now
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:19:04 UTC No. 16545327
>>16545252
puzzle done
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:19:05 UTC No. 16545328
We did it reddit!
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:19:07 UTC No. 16545329
PLENTY OF TIME LEFT FOR ANOTHER GOON SESH, GONNA RUB ONE OUT
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:19:21 UTC No. 16545330
COMING IN 2031
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:19:35 UTC No. 16545331
>>16545329
Based. For me it's Maisie.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:19:44 UTC No. 16545333
>>16545329
AAAAND DONE, WHAT DID I MISS?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:19:49 UTC No. 16545334
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YB
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:20:08 UTC No. 16545335
>>16545327
DIS NIGGA EATEN BEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAANNNNNSSSS
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:20:09 UTC No. 16545336
>>16545327
one day we'll all eat space food
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:20:56 UTC No. 16545338
Every time I look over the clock has counted back up.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:21:05 UTC No. 16545339
>>16545318
>finally my sleep disorders are useful for once
Are you me?
>>16545331
>nothing new in the bbw thread on /d/ since I last checked
Fug
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:21:10 UTC No. 16545340
>>16545333
3 more delays
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:21:18 UTC No. 16545341
>>16545338
well stop looking
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:21:27 UTC No. 16545343
>>16545338
stop looking. You're ruining it for everyone
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:21:32 UTC No. 16545344
>>16545338
based relativistic poster
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:21:36 UTC No. 16545345
>>16545319
kino
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:21:48 UTC No. 16545347
How much longer is even left in the fucking window?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:21:58 UTC No. 16545348
>>16545085
Main Character Syndrome
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:22:06 UTC No. 16545349
>>16545347
I too wonder
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:22:19 UTC No. 16545350
>>16545319
How does this shit land?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:22:22 UTC No. 16545351
>>16545329
I've ejaculated for each delay so far.
I don't think I can think my dick can take any more
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:22:27 UTC No. 16545352
>>16545347
one and a half hours
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:22:31 UTC No. 16545353
>>16545347
window closes at 4 am
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:22:44 UTC No. 16545354
>>16545347
An hour and a half plus change if my brain is not fucking with me this early.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:22:50 UTC No. 16545355
>>16545342
noodly Martian genotype
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:23:03 UTC No. 16545357
>>16545353
>4 am
what time zone, dingus
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:23:22 UTC No. 16545358
>>16545356
that looks good
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:23:23 UTC No. 16545359
>>16545356
mmm sloppa
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:23:41 UTC No. 16545360
>>16545342
blorgin are professional mockup artists
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:23:45 UTC No. 16545361
>>16545356
can I bum a slice?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:23:45 UTC No. 16545362
>>16545356
thank you anon. my blue balls can't endure any longer
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:23:56 UTC No. 16545363
>>16545357
Eastern Burger Time, its a KSC
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:23:56 UTC No. 16545364
Those poor little ones will get their first rocket lunch scrubing
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:24:07 UTC No. 16545365
Bezos is now "both sides are good" posting about Elon and Moon/Mars.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:24:08 UTC No. 16545366
Aside from the fact I just don't want to be here until the end of the window I've got a really nice view of the pad from where I'm working so I could actually see it take off.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:24:46 UTC No. 16545369
>>16545364
gotta teach 'em young
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:24:51 UTC No. 16545370
>>16545364
Good, it'll teach them character
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:24:52 UTC No. 16545371
>>16545356
Mmm that looks good nigga
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:25:23 UTC No. 16545373
>a few anomalies
yeah they're scrubbing
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:25:37 UTC No. 16545374
>>16545356
My guy eating like a king
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:25:45 UTC No. 16545375
its gonna be scrubbed. if it does not launch in the first hourish of the window then there is something more serious holding it back
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:25:53 UTC No. 16545376
>>16543138
bots
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:26:17 UTC No. 16545377
>>16545356
Looks good
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:26:30 UTC No. 16545378
>>16545356
bro the fuck kinda pizza is that?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:26:33 UTC No. 16545379
The FAA should fine them a billion dollars for closing the airspace for nothing
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:26:41 UTC No. 16545380
>good practice
yep it's a scrub
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:26:54 UTC No. 16545381
>No launch thread so the general itself is stickied
A disaster
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:27:07 UTC No. 16545382
>>16545356
wish I didnt run out of fucking food, enjoy your munchies
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:27:30 UTC No. 16545383
>>16545381
my fault
I usually make the launch threads, for the past 9 years
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:27:57 UTC No. 16545384
good thing i asked mom to buy me some snacks earlier today
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:28:24 UTC No. 16545386
>>16545384
Does you mom have a nice ass?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:28:24 UTC No. 16545387
>>16545383
it's fine. There's no launch so why bother with a new thread?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:28:30 UTC No. 16545389
it is almost 3 am this is no time to be eating
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:28:50 UTC No. 16545390
>>16545387
jej
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:29:06 UTC No. 16545392
Thread theme https://youtu.be/mML2fPec7xU
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:29:31 UTC No. 16545394
>>16545319
But how do you decelerate?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:29:35 UTC No. 16545395
>>16545356
Woah, is that the Jeff Sokol special??
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zJI
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:29:37 UTC No. 16545396
my lazy wife is so pretty :)
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:29:42 UTC No. 16545397
>>16545350
Suicide nuke.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:29:56 UTC No. 16545398
>>16545378
Build your own pizza. A simple pizza base meant for adding ingredients. I added peperoni, chorizo, cheddar+parm cheese, and Italian seasoning.
>>16545377
It better. Shit cost me 755 rubles.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:30:03 UTC No. 16545399
>>16545379
Has anyone asked about the impact New Glenn will have on local seals?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:30:16 UTC No. 16545400
>>16545393
Rocket-tans are a thing?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:30:38 UTC No. 16545401
>>16545398
>rubles.
yikes
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:30:55 UTC No. 16545402
>>16545386
i don't know
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:31:17 UTC No. 16545403
>>16545392
nah https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=72s
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:31:29 UTC No. 16545404
>>16545383
sup
I made the IFT-6 launch thread for you
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:31:59 UTC No. 16545407
it's nice that they had all these promo videos prepared to fill the time during the 20+ delays
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:32:09 UTC No. 16545408
what if the problem with blue is that the rocket park's too nice? new glenn doesn't want to leave
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:32:11 UTC No. 16545409
>>16545400
holy new
thread should have never been pinned
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:32:23 UTC No. 16545411
>>16545404
thanks
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:32:26 UTC No. 16545412
>Been here 10 years now (and no launches)
We all have. And that's just the past hour and a half.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:32:36 UTC No. 16545414
>>16545398
>rubles
I'm so sorry.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:32:43 UTC No. 16545415
>>16545398
>puccians on my anime forum
Cringe
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:32:55 UTC No. 16545416
>>16545400
Always was
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:33:43 UTC No. 16545418
>on launch days
LMAO
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:33:50 UTC No. 16545419
>>16545398
>755 rubles
That's pretty in line with most frozen pizzas I see around here
>>16545400
>>16545417
Lurk moar newfag
>>16545409
Sea dragon needs to be thicker
>>16545415
go away /ugh/
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:33:53 UTC No. 16545420
>>16545400
rocketgirls are a /sfg/ staple
>>16545407
all of these videos would have been played during the long boring stretches of the launch
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:33:58 UTC No. 16545421
>>16545400
Always has been
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:34:02 UTC No. 16545422
>>16545417
usui clear fanclub
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:34:08 UTC No. 16545423
reminder that ganymede is the latin word for catamite
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:34:09 UTC No. 16545424
What a clown show for a spaceflight company that supposedly cross all the ts before pushing anything out of its door.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:34:33 UTC No. 16545427
>>16545417
check the discord
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:34:43 UTC No. 16545428
derpotatoe
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:34:55 UTC No. 16545430
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:35:00 UTC No. 16545431
>>16545417
banana posting
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:35:03 UTC No. 16545432
>/sci/ learns there's a place that unironically worships musk
this general is gonna be a mess for the following days...
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:35:09 UTC No. 16545433
>>16545417
go away
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:35:43 UTC No. 16545436
>>16545417
post your favourite Krystal image
filthy frogposter
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:35:44 UTC No. 16545437
>>16545356
why doesn't it have any toppings?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:35:50 UTC No. 16545438
>>16545417
Annihilate the atmosphere to improve engine performance.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:35:55 UTC No. 16545439
>>16545400
>>16545409
>>16545416
>>16545420
>>16545430
Does anyone have the Stoke one? Haven't seen it in a long time
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:35:58 UTC No. 16545440
TURTLE RELOCATION
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:35:58 UTC No. 16545441
TOTAL TURTLE DEATH
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:36:10 UTC No. 16545442
>>16545430
> GayCqNzWwAA9aEh
>Gay
rocketgirls confirmed yuri
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:36:14 UTC No. 16545443
Can't believe Jeff killed 6 million turtles.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:36:33 UTC No. 16545444
That Berger tweet is getting funnier and funnier
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:36:34 UTC No. 16545445
>>16545383
I forgive you, you put in good work
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:36:35 UTC No. 16545446
>>16545417
first you must suck Elon Musk's cock
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:36:43 UTC No. 16545447
>>16545440
>>16545441
duality of sfg
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:36:45 UTC No. 16545448
>>16545432
Not after his indian episode
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:36:49 UTC No. 16545449
>>16545427
No. Discord ruins threads and is used by midwits. I'm not installing your gay spyware so I can listen to you retards sperg over antique tech and while listening to a bunch of H1Bs jerking off to Elon Musk.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:37:04 UTC No. 16545450
+30 minutes
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:37:07 UTC No. 16545451
I hope they hurry this up, I've got a meeting in 90 minutes
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:37:08 UTC No. 16545452
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:37:10 UTC No. 16545453
Alright I'm done
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:37:12 UTC No. 16545454
AIEEEEEEE
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:37:14 UTC No. 16545455
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:37:16 UTC No. 16545456
>>16545444
which one
>>16545449
we also have a Minecraft server
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:37:18 UTC No. 16545457
> The /pol/ woo posters flood into the thread to jam the signal
Inevitable and unbearable.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:37:31 UTC No. 16545458
>clock reset
LMAO
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:37:31 UTC No. 16545459
SCRUBBED
>SCRUBBED
SCRUBBED
>SCRUBBED
SCRUBBED
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:37:33 UTC No. 16545460
Fuck off Jeff
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:37:37 UTC No. 16545462
My goodness. Only 40 more minutes already.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:37:38 UTC No. 16545464
I really just came in here to see what the people who are subjecting themselves to this nonsense willingly.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:37:38 UTC No. 16545465
Holy fucking God in heaven Jeff I need to sleep. Please, I'm begging you
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:37:40 UTC No. 16545466
>>16545417
Refer to the first post after the OP
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:37:42 UTC No. 16545467
Holy fucking shit
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:37:45 UTC No. 16545468
>the countdown keeps getting longer
Kek, stuck valve strikes again
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:37:46 UTC No. 16545469
6th delay? 7th? We need a counter BO
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:37:46 UTC No. 16545470
>another delay
They're not even in the window anymore are they
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:37:59 UTC No. 16545472
>Another reset
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:38:08 UTC No. 16545474
IT WILL NOT LAUNCH TODAY
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:38:13 UTC No. 16545475
the clock is going backwards
don't forget, you're here forever
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:38:14 UTC No. 16545476
>>16545441
>>16545440
USE TURTLES AS MASS SIMULATOR
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:38:18 UTC No. 16545477
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:38:22 UTC No. 16545478
>>16545469
6th
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:38:25 UTC No. 16545479
>>16545442
Got any Apollo-Onions/u/z?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:38:28 UTC No. 16545480
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:38:30 UTC No. 16545481
FFS formally scrub already.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:38:32 UTC No. 16545482
>>16545435
thanks
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:38:35 UTC No. 16545483
>>16545470
Surprisingly they are because it was 3 hours, 2 hours ago.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:38:44 UTC No. 16545486
REUSABLE CLOCKS
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:38:47 UTC No. 16545487
Clear knew this would happen
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:39:06 UTC No. 16545488
>>16545470
~1:20 left.
It's going to scrub either way.>>16545479
You can write Soyuz, tourist.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:39:15 UTC No. 16545489
>>16545417
>Be H1b
>Go on dischord
>Post endless nonsense to push the thread out of the catalog
>rinse repeat
Welcome to /sfg/
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:39:17 UTC No. 16545491
>>16545485
mommy
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:39:25 UTC No. 16545492
OH COME ON I JUST WENT FOR A PISS HOW IS THAT ENOUGH JUSTIFICATION TO PUSH THE LAUNCH BACK
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:39:27 UTC No. 16545493
>>16545416
This bunny needs breeding
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:39:31 UTC No. 16545494
>>16545483
Ive been watching this shit so long I forgot what time it was, jesus.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:39:40 UTC No. 16545495
Have they given any reasons why they are pushing the clock forward all the time?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:39:49 UTC No. 16545498
>Second stage spends so long full of LH2 that it embrittles and explodes before launch
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:40:04 UTC No. 16545499
they don't actually have 7 working be-4s, do they?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:40:07 UTC No. 16545500
Just a couple more minutes heh
Just a couple more hours heh
Just a couple more days heh
Just a couple more weeks heh
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:40:07 UTC No. 16545501
>>16545490
Until the next thirty more minutes.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:40:21 UTC No. 16545502
At this point I feel like Jeff needs to compensate me for wasting my time
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:40:29 UTC No. 16545503
>>16545493
Stoke-chan a cute!
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:40:36 UTC No. 16545504
berger says 48 hour turnaround if they don't launch tonight.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:40:46 UTC No. 16545505
lmao the posts in this thread make up like 30 uninterrupted sci posts by the post number. sfg continues to be about 50% of all sci posts, averaged out
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:40:47 UTC No. 16545506
>>16545488
writing /u/ in Soyuz apparently tripped the word filter
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:40:52 UTC No. 16545508
>>16545439
Whoops, all Astra!
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:40:54 UTC No. 16545509
should I just go to sleep now? I don't want to miss it but I suspect I wont
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:41:10 UTC No. 16545511
>>16545506
No shit, tourist.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:41:15 UTC No. 16545512
>>16545498
Would be funny, but I imagine they are built to withstand several taking/detaninking for several scrubs.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:41:37 UTC No. 16545514
>>16545442
Propellant transfer is lewd.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:41:44 UTC No. 16545515
>>16545417
Do you accept God-Emperor Musk as you Lord and Saviour?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:41:53 UTC No. 16545517
Just launch the fucking thing and let it blow up, you'll never gather any data staying on the ground.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:41:54 UTC No. 16545518
>>16545479
>Apollo-Onions/u/z
>Onions
oh fuck that's hilarious. I forgot about that filter
and no, I don't have anything, I'd like some myself
this is somewhat relevant I guess
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:42:18 UTC No. 16545519
>>16545511
Just gimme the yuri if you have any
>>16545514
Lewd, what's next gonna post hand holding?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:42:22 UTC No. 16545520
>>16543091
One day, there will be a city on the Falkland islands
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:42:37 UTC No. 16545521
>>16545505
The rest of the board has been dead for years
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:42:40 UTC No. 16545522
>>16545517
wrong boyo, we'll know the exact procedures done before launch
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:42:59 UTC No. 16545524
>>16545495
"Anomalies".
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:43:07 UTC No. 16545525
>>16545417
Can't have culture without life and there is no life in space.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:43:45 UTC No. 16545527
BO respects your time as much as they respects Bezos's money.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:43:51 UTC No. 16545528
>>16545519
>gimme the yuri
don't have to tell me twice
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:44:14 UTC No. 16545530
>>16545520
Malvinas Argentinas btw
>>16545504
so Starship and Nuglin on the same day, got it
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:44:20 UTC No. 16545531
>>16545522
But the only procedure you did before launch was rewinding the launch clock!
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:44:21 UTC No. 16545532
>>16545417
it's not that easy
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:44:35 UTC No. 16545533
might be a possibility
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:44:46 UTC No. 16545534
Why even give a time when they are obviously paused indefinitely
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:45:07 UTC No. 16545535
>>16545530
>Malvinas Argentinas
Your failed attempt at revitalizing your fucked economy back in the 80s says otherwise.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:45:28 UTC No. 16545538
URF
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:45:30 UTC No. 16545539
why is blue origin running an advertisement for the planet earth now
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:45:33 UTC No. 16545540
EARTHER GO HOME
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:45:35 UTC No. 16545541
>there might be a possibility
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:46:31 UTC No. 16545544
I bet the atmosphere is behind this
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:46:33 UTC No. 16545545
Earth so smol. Live in an Oneal Cylinder.
ZEEK ZEON!
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:46:35 UTC No. 16545546
>>16545539
Can't sell engines to the government without spouting The Message.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:46:43 UTC No. 16545547
lol just put up "hold" instead of a timer if they aren't actually on a countdown
what the fuck man
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:46:44 UTC No. 16545548
>we can't wait to fix earth first, we have to go now
OK Jeff, you can be in the club.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:46:58 UTC No. 16545549
>>16545530
>If the New Glenn launch attempt is aborted this morning, it likely would necessitate a 48-hour delay (at least). The weather becomes poorer two days from now, and the current launch window closes on January 16. So this may be their only chance for a bit. We'll see.
https://x.com/SciGuySpace/status/18
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:47:09 UTC No. 16545550
>>16545518
I've seen this on a booru a long time ago
>>16545505
/sfg/ and the other generals are the only threads that are consistently on topic. Most regular threads at this point threads are just /pol/ and unfunny shitposting, and its rare to find a decent /sci/ thread that's on topic, in depth, and lasts more than 20 posts.
>>16545528
Thank you, very c/u/te
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:47:16 UTC No. 16545552
>>16545524
Observations
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:47:35 UTC No. 16545553
SOLARCELS BTFO
SO ZASED
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:47:44 UTC No. 16545554
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R8i
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:47:59 UTC No. 16545556
https://x.com/SciGuySpace/status/18
>No final decisions, but it sounds like this is not looking good for a launch this morning.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:48:17 UTC No. 16545557
SPACE
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:48:25 UTC No. 16545558
>"SPACE"
I didn't see that coming, wow
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:48:29 UTC No. 16545559
https://x.com/SciGuySpace/status/18
>not looking good
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:48:34 UTC No. 16545560
>>16545535
Meh, I was just memeing, don't really care about the islands. We are on a good track with Milei though, aka Musk's new best friend :)
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:48:35 UTC No. 16545561
>>16545554
>Bo Burnham
As much I like laughing at Bezos, I always hated this faggot
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:48:59 UTC No. 16545562
>>16545547
Like I said, they scrubbed hours ago. This is just a dry run at this point
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:49:22 UTC No. 16545564
The factory can't hurt you. We launched it towards Saturn.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:49:23 UTC No. 16545565
>>16545560
>We are on a good track with Milei though
You thought that about the junta and Falklands too.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:49:52 UTC No. 16545567
>>16545539
what do you think the "blue" and "origin" in blue origin stand for?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:49:57 UTC No. 16545568
naw blud installed the megastructures DLC :skull:
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:50:00 UTC No. 16545569
>>16545549
See you all next year, jesus fuck
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:50:17 UTC No. 16545570
>>16545563
It's fake new "innovation" that's been happening since the pandemic. Pretending to be innovative while using technology from the 60's
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:51:01 UTC No. 16545572
>>16545561
he's low T and feminine, his style and comedy appeals to women and gays
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:51:20 UTC No. 16545574
>really hard
hmmm
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:51:40 UTC No. 16545575
>>16545574
just like me rn
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:51:55 UTC No. 16545576
>>16545560
some of your desert shit up in the northwest of your country is the best land on earth for solar farms, go build shit up there.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:52:22 UTC No. 16545577
You know they had to make 4 hours of footage, with 3 hours of it being sorted by how much they wanted the public to see it. We're getting into the pig slop now.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:52:37 UTC No. 16545578
>>16545570
You can't seriously look at the tech they have and pretend it's from the 60's though.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:52:45 UTC No. 16545579
>>16545566
At least it'll get off the ground.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:52:48 UTC No. 16545580
Whats going on why are we a sticky for New Glenn. I would think janny doesnt give a shit about this no? Starship I get but NG?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:53:04 UTC No. 16545583
>>16545577
nothing beats the astra pre-filmed explosion response clip they played heh
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:53:24 UTC No. 16545584
>>16545581
latex fail
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:53:30 UTC No. 16545585
>>16545577
i'd at least rent out some vtubers who could do a singing stream and keep things interesting if we get stuck in scrubhell like this
🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:53:40 UTC No. 16545586
>>16545581
naw how did blud get the funni text?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:53:42 UTC No. 16545587
You won't do shit on the moon if you don't LAUNCH THE FUCKING ROCKET, Jeff!
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:53:44 UTC No. 16545588
ZEEK ZEON
🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:53:59 UTC No. 16545589
>>16545581
laugh at this user
🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:54:03 UTC No. 16545590
>>16545581
heh. let me know if you figure out how to do color
🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:54:06 UTC No. 16545591
fully reusable cathedrals
>>16545581
embarrassing
🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:54:08 UTC No. 16545592
>>16545584
[math] \color{red}{\bf{ \lower{0.125em}{ \unicode[arial,helvetica, sans-serif]{x28}} \unicode[arial,helvetica, sans-serif]{x55} \unicode[arial,helvetica, sans-serif]{x53}
\unicode[arial,helvetica, sans-serif]{x45} \unicode[arial,helvetica, sans-serif]{x52} \unicode[arial,helvetica, sans-serif]{x20} \unicode[arial,helvetica, sans-serif]{x57}
\unicode[arial,helvetica, sans-serif]{x41} \unicode[arial,helvetica, sans-serif]{x53} \unicode[arial,helvetica, sans-serif]{x20} \unicode[arial,helvetica, sans-serif]{x42}
\unicode[arial,helvetica, sans-serif]{x41} \unicode[arial,helvetica, sans-serif]{x4e} \unicode[arial,helvetica, sans-serif]{x4e} \unicode[arial,helvetica, sans-serif]{x45}
\unicode[arial,helvetica, sans-serif]{x44} \unicode[arial,helvetica, sans-serif]{x20} \unicode[arial,helvetica, sans-serif]{x46} \unicode[arial,helvetica, sans-serif]{x4f}
\unicode[arial,helvetica, sans-serif]{x52} \unicode[arial,helvetica, sans-serif]{x20} \unicode[arial,helvetica, sans-serif]{x54} \unicode[arial,helvetica, sans-serif]{x48}
\unicode[arial,helvetica, sans-serif]{x49} \unicode[arial,helvetica, sans-serif]{x53} \unicode[arial,helvetica, sans-serif]{x20} \unicode[arial,helvetica, sans-serif]{x50}
\unicode[arial,helvetica, sans-serif]{x4f} \unicode[arial,helvetica, sans-serif]{x53} \unicode[arial,helvetica, sans-serif]{x54} \lower{0.125em}{ \unicode[arial,helvetica, sans-serif]{x29}}}} [/math]
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:55:06 UTC No. 16545593
>>16545572
You don't need to remind me. My first exposure to him was when he performed at Uni my freshman year and the song he opened with was "Straight White Male."
>>16545581
>jakpost is a faggot that can't into Latex
LOOK AT HIM LOOK AT HIM AND LAUGH
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:55:13 UTC No. 16545594
I remember when they fixed the red text on sci, to prevent people from making fake banned messages. It was like 2016. Give it up lmao
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:55:52 UTC No. 16545595
New jig
https://jiggie.fun/LKEw8u
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:56:04 UTC No. 16545596
>>16545595
they don't load for me :(
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:56:06 UTC No. 16545597
lol what was all that posting?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:56:06 UTC No. 16545598
Users were jannied by this faggotry.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:56:17 UTC No. 16545600
>>16545556
https://x.com/SciGuySpace/status/18
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:56:48 UTC No. 16545601
>propellants that are less harmful to the earth, like liquid oxygen
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:57:14 UTC No. 16545602
>>16545565
I'm high on hopium this time, what could go wrong
>>16545576
I hope the next Gigafactory is built here, fingers crossed.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:57:47 UTC No. 16545604
>>16545600
a surprise to no one
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:58:09 UTC No. 16545605
>>16545600
>It's a technical issue with the rocket
Slow and steady bros...
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:58:35 UTC No. 16545606
17 minutes
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:59:14 UTC No. 16545607
BO needs a "fuck it we ball" launch director.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:59:19 UTC No. 16545608
These retarded hosts are stumbling over their holier than thou platitudes
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:59:21 UTC No. 16545609
Join the BPS.space stream
https://www.youtube.com/live/FHxN92
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:00:15 UTC No. 16545610
>>16545609
Buy an ad.
🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:00:19 UTC No. 16545611
>>16545608
They're thinking about BBC
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:01:11 UTC No. 16545613
Is Jeff still in the control room? Poor guy, must be feeling sleepy
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:01:35 UTC No. 16545616
>>16545595
wtf is this chinkshit
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:01:44 UTC No. 16545618
New Scrub
Chris Whitty at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:02:26 UTC No. 16545619
>>16545618
Scrub Origin haha
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:02:27 UTC No. 16545620
>counter gone
SCRUB INCOMING
GET DOWN
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:02:28 UTC No. 16545621
abort
https://x.com/SciGuySpace/status/18
>They're scrubbing the launch attempt of New Glenn this morning. Not sure when it will be made official.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:02:33 UTC No. 16545622
>>16545613
naw he slipped into the executive bathroom and hit some sugar
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:02:51 UTC No. 16545623
>>16545613
He may as well be in the trench for all the good he's done.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:03:07 UTC No. 16545624
T-0 LIFTOFF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:03:10 UTC No. 16545625
0:00:00
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:03:13 UTC No. 16545626
SCRUB MY STINKY BALLS
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:03:16 UTC No. 16545627
Body Odoring fails. Better luck getting it up next time, baldy.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:03:21 UTC No. 16545629
Ive been trolled
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:03:21 UTC No. 16545630
F
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:03:38 UTC No. 16545632
timer gone, it's over
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:03:50 UTC No. 16545633
Kekaroooooo!
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:03:51 UTC No. 16545634
SCRUB MY ASS
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:03:55 UTC No. 16545635
FEROCIOUSLY
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:04:04 UTC No. 16545638
Fuck jeff bezos
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:04:08 UTC No. 16545639
scrub a lub dub
probably a hydrolox issue
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:04:12 UTC No. 16545640
>>16545620
>>16545621
RIP, anyone know if they have announced a next window?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:04:14 UTC No. 16545641
Is it detanking?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:04:16 UTC No. 16545642
Now unsticky this shit and fuck off, tourists.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:04:25 UTC No. 16545645
OWARI DA...
Chris Whitty at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:04:34 UTC No. 16545646
>>16545635
SCRUB FEROCIOUSLY
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:04:39 UTC No. 16545647
welcome to the club
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:04:40 UTC No. 16545648
We have passed through time itself.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:04:53 UTC No. 16545649
Fucking atrocious.
At least SpaceX has the decency to scrub early on.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:05:03 UTC No. 16545650
>>16545647
kek
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:05:08 UTC No. 16545652
slowly but ferociously wasted two hours of my life
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:05:11 UTC No. 16545653
>>16545640
https://x.com/SciGuySpace/status/18
>If the New Glenn launch attempt is aborted this morning, it likely would necessitate a 48-hour delay (at least). The weather becomes poorer two days from now, and the current launch window closes on January 16. So this may be their only chance for a bit. We'll see.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:05:37 UTC No. 16545655
Watch them spincope this-
>"we had a very successful countdown tonight, and will proceed sometime this week".
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:05:45 UTC No. 16545656
Did the presenters commit sudoku or something? Fess up.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:05:53 UTC No. 16545657
woke up and kept gettin edged for 2.5h
they should have just scrubbed it right away if there was a technical problem
for fucks sake
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:05:59 UTC No. 16545658
>>16545649
This way they get valuable
DATA
A
T
A
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:06:10 UTC No. 16545660
>>16545653
OK Mr Weather Man
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:06:16 UTC No. 16545661
MILK THE BLUE ORIGIN OFFICE TITCOWS
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:06:24 UTC No. 16545662
BERGER SAYS SCRUB
S
C
R
U
B
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:06:27 UTC No. 16545664
>>16545656
they probably fell asleep
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:06:49 UTC No. 16545666
>>16545657
>We can't keep resetting the countdown for you to take smoke brea-
>I'M ON BREAAAAAAAK!
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:07:01 UTC No. 16545667
CLOCK TEST PASSED! IT WAS A BIT HARD TO COUNTDOWN FROM 30 MINUTES TO ZERO AND WE HAD TO RETRY A FEW TIMES BUT WE PERSEVERED! SEE YOU NEXT YEAR
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:07:18 UTC No. 16545668
>>16545658
THIS :clap: IS :clap: WHY :clap: WE :clap: TEST
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:07:34 UTC No. 16545669
>>16545666
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k8t
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:07:41 UTC No. 16545670
Berger is lying. Keep it up, blue bros!
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:07:47 UTC No. 16545671
>>16545560
>powering your economy through just debt
>good track
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:08:20 UTC No. 16545672
honestly I had fun today nonetheless. Glad to know BO hasn't changed at all throughout the years
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:08:46 UTC No. 16545673
>SHEEEIIIT, DIS DUN ROKIT BE TAKIN TU LAWNG
>*exits out fire escape for another smoke*
>*building evacuated
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:09:01 UTC No. 16545674
ahh the sounds of detanking
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:09:03 UTC No. 16545676
>>16545665
Why are you watching NASA basedflight?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:09:29 UTC No. 16545678
At least their rockets never blow up
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:09:38 UTC No. 16545679
>those sounds
It's over
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:09:46 UTC No. 16545680
>>16545674
yep, detanking confirmed. go to bed everyone.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:10:36 UTC No. 16545681
>>16545653
Thanks anon.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:10:38 UTC No. 16545682
Not satisfied with wasting Jeff's money, now BO come to waste everyone's time.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:10:39 UTC No. 16545683
looooooolollololol
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:10:40 UTC No. 16545684
Blue Origin? More like Blue Balls.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:10:40 UTC No. 16545685
THE ROCKET DON'T WORK
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:10:42 UTC No. 16545686
BO roasted
cooked
fried
baked
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:10:43 UTC No. 16545687
scrubbed officially
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:10:44 UTC No. 16545688
goodnight /sfg/
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:10:45 UTC No. 16545689
SCRUB
https://x.com/blueorigin/status/187
>thread is not a sticky anymore
>image limit
ACTIVATE LES
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:11:01 UTC No. 16545690
Owari
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:11:07 UTC No. 16545691
KKKEEEEEEEEEEKKKKKKKK
>NEXT YEAR
NEXT YEAR
>NEXT YEAR
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:11:14 UTC No. 16545693
Aww, too bad.
I've never watched a launch live before.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:11:21 UTC No. 16545694
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAH
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:11:43 UTC No. 16545696
Launch aborted. Staging failed. Activating LES:
>>16545695
>>16545695
>>16545695
>>16545695
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:11:49 UTC No. 16545697
GRADATIM FEROCER
LMAO
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:11:56 UTC No. 16545698
How did Clear know?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:12:24 UTC No. 16545700
>>16545672
>I had fun today nonetheless
same, watching a live stream with sfg might be one of the best experiences ever. My sides hurt from so laughing so much lmao
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:12:31 UTC No. 16545702
I blame DEI.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:12:50 UTC No. 16545706
sleep fucked for no reason, fuck you jeff
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:13:18 UTC No. 16545708
>>16545698
God moves in mystious ways.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:14:31 UTC No. 16545719
>>16545696
>staging at page 1
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:15:33 UTC No. 16545724
Holy shit...I've never seen the replies hit that high
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:16:33 UTC No. 16545726
>>16543091
Blue Orgin? More like Blue Balling
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:17:08 UTC No. 16545728
>>16545724
It was already at bump limit before it got stickied
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:19:04 UTC No. 16545733
>Be me
>Be tired
>See imminent launch
>Repeated delays during countdown
>Bet that the rocket is going to scrub
>Wake up minutes ago
>Might as well check what happened
>Scrubbed
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:19:44 UTC No. 16545737
>>16543104
look at this retard
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:20:23 UTC No. 16545740
>>16545733
might as well bet that the sun will rise tomorrow while at it
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:21:02 UTC No. 16545743
Scrub Glenn
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:26:42 UTC No. 16545751
we did the puzzle
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:28:00 UTC No. 16545756
No launch, but at least I made anime tiddy puzzles with internet rocket racists.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 10:07:39 UTC No. 16545820
Jeff is a nigger
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 11:48:53 UTC No. 16545863
>wake up
>catch up
>it's on page 2
>image limit expended
>various shouts of "sticky"
holy fuck faggots, start a launch thread next time before the mods can make a sticky
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 12:12:36 UTC No. 16545881
>>16545863
didn't launch
thus no launch thread
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 12:14:54 UTC No. 16545882
>>16545881
sorry, I meant start a scrub thread
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 12:55:48 UTC No. 16545911
>>16544159
gah, scrubbed. lame. sorry for anyone bothered to stay up for it
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 15:08:27 UTC No. 16546008
>>16545130
lmao
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 19:42:33 UTC No. 16546332
I wanted to post a picture of my launch viewing spot in here but I kept wondering if I'm not actually supposed to show that.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 21:45:47 UTC No. 16546472
I just got back from a long shift at work, how did the Blue Origin launch go?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 21:56:58 UTC No. 16546485
>>16546472
Scrubbed. They may be making another attempt tonight.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 21:57:51 UTC No. 16546488
>>16545239
Ground based laser stations.
Anonymous at Tue, 14 Jan 2025 00:29:51 UTC No. 16546678
>>16544159
>>16544483
>>16544484
>privated
lol
Anonymous at Tue, 14 Jan 2025 00:30:44 UTC No. 16546680
Blue Origin's New Glenn tonight/tomorrow morning 1/14 @ 1:00am local. It is back on.
Anonymous at Tue, 14 Jan 2025 00:52:32 UTC No. 16546696
>>16546680
Yeah, in fantasy land
Anonymous at Tue, 14 Jan 2025 01:20:36 UTC No. 16546716
>>16546696
https://x.com/blueorigin/status/187
Anonymous at Tue, 14 Jan 2025 01:39:18 UTC No. 16546735
>>16546716
You just posted the fantasy land official hotline
Anonymous at Tue, 14 Jan 2025 02:29:52 UTC No. 16546770
>>16546716
https://x.com/blueorigin/status/187
Now its 16th. Day after Starship
Anonymous at Tue, 14 Jan 2025 05:28:31 UTC No. 16546863
>>16543233
>russia
>replacing the iss
lol. lmao. they are lucky if they manage to keep space access by keeping their ancient sojuz shitboxes chugging along. at the rate they are degenerating and decomposing that is
Anonymous at Tue, 14 Jan 2025 19:21:58 UTC No. 16547416
>>16545663
It's currently beaten in every metric
Anonymous at Tue, 14 Jan 2025 19:26:42 UTC No. 16547425
>>16547416
Not by Nooglin, that's for sure.
Anonymous at Tue, 14 Jan 2025 19:34:13 UTC No. 16547441
>>16544987
If they have access to Bezoar's engines why don't they beg for government money so they can design a reusable rocket and not go bankrupt.
Anonymous at Tue, 14 Jan 2025 19:35:18 UTC No. 16547444
>>16547425
It's almost like neither vehicle is done
Anonymous at Wed, 15 Jan 2025 00:47:49 UTC No. 16547798
>>16545191
Yes...follow me to the back office, I got something for yo-- I mean them.
We'll be sure to pound out this situation real quickly--heh--yes.
Anonymous at Wed, 15 Jan 2025 01:18:14 UTC No. 16547816
>>16547798
I think I would pound her out pretty quickly with my cock
Anonymous at Wed, 15 Jan 2025 07:54:31 UTC No. 16548033
>>16547816
Rude
Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 02:11:40 UTC No. 16548864
LESS THAN ONE HOUR FOR BLUE ORIGIN TO LAUNCH!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9hm
I's happenning.
Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 02:42:20 UTC No. 16548895
Welcome back fags. Tongiht is the night, i can feal it