Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 02:46:49 UTC No. 16576999

Venison-is-tasty edition

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 02:46:49 UTC No. 16577000

Guys...we are GOING

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 02:55:49 UTC No. 16577003

2 0 2 6

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 02:56:21 UTC No. 16577004

Per the last thread:
>The impact risk assessment for 2024 YR4 has been revised from a 1.6% chance of impact to 1.9%.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 02:56:55 UTC No. 16577005

>>16576987
Space Cowboys

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 03:02:25 UTC No. 16577009

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dCiMUWw1BBc

how would you rate the speculative biology in this video? yeah yeah I know the channel is popsci slop but how about these aliens and planets? are they realistic?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 03:02:56 UTC No. 16577010

>>16577004
can't wait until it's 50/50
it either does or doesn't

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 03:06:11 UTC No. 16577013

>>16577004
Elon is our only hope.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 03:07:08 UTC No. 16577014

>>16577004
obama was right about manned asteroid missions

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 03:09:28 UTC No. 16577015

>>16577004
We have to fix Earth's problems fi-ACK

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 03:20:35 UTC No. 16577019

>>16577004
We NEED to send a probe to nudge it into a 100% collision probability

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 03:24:35 UTC No. 16577021

>>16577015
lol, we're already fixing all the problems on earth
by 2025 there will be nothing left to whine about

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 03:27:32 UTC No. 16577022

>>16577021
derp, 2026

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 03:29:25 UTC No. 16577023

>>16577021
sure

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 03:42:21 UTC No. 16577028

>>16576999
venison medallions that are fried and served with mashed potatoes and gravy is amazing

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 03:44:16 UTC No. 16577030

>>16577013
Elon is a grifter and you're retarded.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 03:49:03 UTC No. 16577031

>>16577030
Our Elon, who art in Starbase
Hallowed be thy stock price.
Thy Mars come, thy will be done,
On Earth as it shall be on SpaceX colonies.
In Musk we trust.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 03:50:28 UTC No. 16577033

>>16577031
I can't tell if you're a bot or just really dumb. If you are a human I guarantee you're an H1b.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 03:51:26 UTC No. 16577035

>>16577031
Hail Elon, full of vision,
Innovation is with thee.
Blessed art thou among founders,
And blessed is the fruit of thy ventures, Tesla and SpaceX.

Holy Elon, leader of progress,
Guide us dreamers, now and in the age of Mars colonization.
Amen.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 03:54:21 UTC No. 16577039

>>16577033
My dad is H1B but I am born American

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 04:13:17 UTC No. 16577053

i was wondering why they removed the raptor inspired engine from the cryo engines mod...

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 04:15:58 UTC No. 16577056

>>16577031
Based Musk

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 04:16:37 UTC No. 16577057

>>16577053
Lots of crybabies at the moment.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 04:35:03 UTC No. 16577064

>>16577053
Talk about petty.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 04:38:51 UTC No. 16577067

>>16577019
aim for the yellowstone caldera

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 05:02:10 UTC No. 16577075

>>16577004
>7.7 megatons impact power
>only major cities on trajectory are in Nigeria, India and Pakistan
nothingburger

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 05:16:10 UTC No. 16577084

>>16577075
The worst thing that could happen is an accurate, timely impact forecast warning, and a well-executed evacuation effort that could save millions. The resulting shitskin exodus would decimate places far and wide, with wealthy countries absorbing a disproportionate share of the fallout.
That would be a real fucking tragedy for the planet.
Dont we know enough already? Let's keep this on the down low until the day of, okay?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 05:49:48 UTC No. 16577110

>>16577053
Modders not letting their personal politics get into their mods challenge:

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 06:12:47 UTC No. 16577122

Has anyone done spectroscopy on 2024 YR4 yet?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 06:19:36 UTC No. 16577123

>>16577053
Lol he makes you dig through the uncategorised parts for this.
Nertea always seemed like a bit of a faggot
So long as the Iguanodon stays I'm fine but haha damn what a twat. Imagine being a SpaceX engineer who worked on the Raptor seeing this, I'd be fucking pissed.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 06:26:13 UTC No. 16577129

What if...

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 06:30:16 UTC No. 16577134

>>16577004
Anyone here reached 30 and gotten their wizard powers yet? This time next year I can start up a monthly warlock circle and we can work on pumping that percentage up.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 06:39:47 UTC No. 16577144

>>16577053
Do they realise that Raptor is a category of bird

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 06:42:55 UTC No. 16577148

>>16577009
They look like fucking pokemans.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 07:26:11 UTC No. 16577172

Putin just fired head or Roscosmos and appointed a new one. Here is a new one on photo. 39 years

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 07:27:39 UTC No. 16577174

>>16577172
Bakanov is the Deputy Minister of Transport. He was born in 1985 in Kazakhstan. Previously, he headed the Postal Logistics Company (part of the Russian Post), in 2012-2019 he headed the Gonets company (the unified operator of Roscosmos for communication and relay systems). From 2019 to 2021, he was the head of the Department of Digital Development of the Ministry of Transport. In April 2022, Russian Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin appointed Bakanov to the post of deputy head of the Ministry of Transport.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 07:33:24 UTC No. 16577179

>>16577009
Kelp forest one is neat and feels feasible, the other two seem a bit retarded

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 07:36:26 UTC No. 16577181

>>16577172
hello sexy handsome

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 07:44:46 UTC No. 16577187

>>16577172
I actually lold at those sleeves, what the hell.
Unfortunate that it's far beyond too late to save Roscosmos regardless of changes in leadership. From his history >>16577174 I get the sense he's an oligarch's kid who just keeps climbing the ladder on the back of his dad's favors.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 08:26:28 UTC No. 16577214

>>16577172
what a chad

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 08:53:38 UTC No. 16577229

>>16577031
btw new info about X/twitter just came out
when he bought it, the revenue was 5bil, EBITDA 0.7bil
a few months ago revenue was 2.5bil and EBITDA was 1.3bil
so half the revenue but double the profits
he actually turned it around and X payments hasn't even come out yet
never bet against elon

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 08:54:39 UTC No. 16577231

>>16577033
you need to be deported to Guantanamo Bay for insulting the chosen one

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 08:55:40 UTC No. 16577232

>>16577053
kek

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 09:02:45 UTC No. 16577236

>>16577172
If you can't have good rockets you can still win on good looks.
Makes sense.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 09:27:23 UTC No. 16577262

>>16577004
g-guys, w-why does the number k-keep going up?!

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 09:30:02 UTC No. 16577264

>>16577023
this meme is false, it already reached orbital velocity on the 14th of march 2024, so this doesn't make any sense.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 09:36:53 UTC No. 16577275

>>16577172
>bakanov
russians are god's funniest joke desu.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 09:57:17 UTC No. 16577290

Two grand canyon sized valleys on the far side of the moon formed within 10 minutes, scientists say

https://edition.cnn.com/2025/02/05/science/lunar-grand-canyons-far-side-moon/index.html

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 10:15:49 UTC No. 16577308

>>16577144
Birds are dinosaurs, m8.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 10:30:33 UTC No. 16577316

>>16577308
average science factoids enjoyer

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 10:57:42 UTC No. 16577322

>>16577316
"Raptor is a category of bird" is a science factoid also

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 11:22:37 UTC No. 16577337

>>16577010

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 11:25:32 UTC No. 16577338

>>16577337
>this is your brain on rebbit

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 11:28:14 UTC No. 16577340

>>16577337
based future 50/50 shitposter

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 11:29:44 UTC No. 16577342

>>16577172
He looks like Chris Kemp.
All white people look the same to me

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 11:34:10 UTC No. 16577346

>>16577342
i'm sorry anon, but you're autistic.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 11:37:13 UTC No. 16577352

>>16577346
worse, he's a nigger

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 11:46:59 UTC No. 16577359

>>16577342
>>16577172
the remaining 90 year old soviet-era engineers that are still in russia cloned chris kemp in hopes to harness his unexplained psionic abilities that somehow keep getting astra more funding.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 11:52:21 UTC No. 16577368

>>16577172
Why’s he bear clawing the water bottle pour

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 11:54:39 UTC No. 16577370

>>16577172
Looks like a nazi in that one pic

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 12:00:26 UTC No. 16577374

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 12:02:21 UTC No. 16577375

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1zu41rrc_Ng

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 12:04:12 UTC No. 16577376

Oh no...
>only the CHinese can copy SpaceX!

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 12:11:28 UTC No. 16577382

>>16577376
Unironically: real SpaceX emulation has never been tried. Just a bunch of idiots doing it wrong, and now investors have shaky feet

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 12:20:30 UTC No. 16577388

>>16577004
Please hit Israel.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 12:22:47 UTC No. 16577391

>>16577004
It went from 1-in-77 to 1-in-53 mwahaha it’s happening

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 12:56:33 UTC No. 16577411

>>16577375

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 13:30:55 UTC No. 16577424

>>16577053
Faggots will "bravely" do this shit, meanwhile they have no problem with including hardware produced under leadership of werner von braun

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 13:41:44 UTC No. 16577431

>>16577084
based

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 13:46:59 UTC No. 16577434

>>16577352
I don't like those guys

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 13:51:06 UTC No. 16577436

>>16577434
that's it! You're getting removed from the no-mars list. Hope you're happy with yourself, chud.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 14:12:07 UTC No. 16577450

>>16577005
what a terrible movie, and im good and dealing with some suspension of disbelief. played way to hard on the whole your so heckin old meme and then did some bullshit in space that buck rodgers would find ridiculous.

October Sky was good though. The other anon should watch The Right Stuff. thats fun

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 14:13:15 UTC No. 16577451

>>16577382
Even if you don't copy SpaceX products outright, you can copy what they do (vertical integration). Some defense and space contractors are doing that now instead of relying on 10+ subcontractors.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 14:13:16 UTC No. 16577452

>>16577013
Help us Elon Muskanobi you're our only hope..bzzzt
Help us Elon Muskanobi you're our only hope..bzzt

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 14:14:29 UTC No. 16577453

>>16577172
Does this one believe men landed on the moon or not?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 14:19:34 UTC No. 16577456

>>16577340
just imagine when he discovers moonhoax and flat earth. a force to be reckoned with

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 14:30:07 UTC No. 16577459

Never ask a man his Salary

Never ask a woman her age

Never ask an EDS when the next starship launch is

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 14:32:19 UTC No. 16577461

>>16577459
lol, and definitely dont say The Name

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 14:43:51 UTC No. 16577465

>>16577172
>>16577174
nepo baby. this bodes bad for roscosmos.

Yusef at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 15:05:41 UTC No. 16577482

>>16577459
Isn't it two weeks from now?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 15:12:08 UTC No. 16577487

>>16577148
yeah but pokemon look like real animals so it balances out.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 15:12:58 UTC No. 16577488

>>16577033
Go back

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 15:14:34 UTC No. 16577489

I wonder if mars will have it's own /sfg/ one day and we will tell retards to go back (to earth)

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 15:17:09 UTC No. 16577491

>>16577053
modder should just delete KSP from their PC then, the field of modern rocketry is inextricably associated with Von Braun, who was an actual Nazi

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 15:19:00 UTC No. 16577493

>>16577053
Leftists trannies are melty

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 15:19:23 UTC No. 16577494

>>16577482
yes

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 15:21:00 UTC No. 16577495

>>16577482
that's if no delays

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 15:27:07 UTC No. 16577496

>>16577482
it usually is

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 15:33:33 UTC No. 16577500

Has anyone considered the irony of all the blood sweat and tears to start a Martian colony as a ‘backup for civilization’ only for Mars to get rocked by a mega impact lol

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 15:37:52 UTC No. 16577502

>>16577500
It's a smaller target.
50/50!

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 15:39:27 UTC No. 16577503

Has anyone considered the irony of all the blood sweat and tears to make a second egg basket only for the basket to get a hole in it lol

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 15:40:56 UTC No. 16577506

>>16577491
don't capitalize the v in von, it's a title and it's not capitalized
it designates him as minor german nobility

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 15:42:02 UTC No. 16577509

>>16577506
knew about the minor nobility bit, not the capitalization cheers

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 15:42:51 UTC No. 16577510

>>16577509
yeah nobody else does either for some reason

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 15:43:11 UTC No. 16577512

>>16577500
another reason why colonies will be underground
also another reason why we should already be decades into an asteroid defense program

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 15:44:25 UTC No. 16577513

https://arstechnica.com/space/2025/02/nasa-moves-up-target-to-return-butch-and-suni-but-not-for-political-reasons/

Astronauts finally getting rescued, regardless of the screeching lmao

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 15:46:01 UTC No. 16577515

>>16577513
Lmao so trump and elon weren't just politicking

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 15:46:13 UTC No. 16577516

the cope

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 15:46:53 UTC No. 16577518

>>16577513
Elon could tweet "I command the sun to rise" at 5am, and by 10am every retard here would be saying "Holy shit elon made the sun rise this morning!"

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 15:49:16 UTC No. 16577519

https://arstechnica.com/space/2025/02/after-a-wrenching-decision-by-nasa-private-lunar-lander-finds-a-new-customer/

grok summary: In 2024, Astrobotic faced significant setbacks with its Peregrine spacecraft's failed lunar mission and NASA's cancellation of the Griffin lander's VIPER rover delivery, but the company found a new purpose for Griffin by securing a payload from Venturi Astrolab. Astrolab will use Griffin to send its half-ton FLIP rover to the Moon as a testbed for technologies needed for their larger FLEX rover, which is set for a later Starship mission.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 15:51:55 UTC No. 16577522

https://arstechnica.com/space/2025/02/nasa-has-entered-the-chat-space-agency-to-twitch-stream-from-orbit/

>The US space agency said Wednesday it will host a live Twitch stream from the International Space Station on February 12.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 15:54:17 UTC No. 16577523

>>16577518
this sums up the drama well kek

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 15:56:22 UTC No. 16577526

>>16577522
ok? ISS has been livestreaming 24/7 for years

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 16:05:04 UTC No. 16577531

>>16577053
ah, makes sense. Type of moron who votes for Trudeau in spite of regulating away rights and an economy, and importing billions of jeets. Candidate for euthanasia or MAID.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 16:12:01 UTC No. 16577536

>>16577376
>>16577382
The environment of the aughts that SpaceX was born in does not exist anymore.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 16:12:24 UTC No. 16577537

>>16577531
Nerd rage lel

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 16:24:24 UTC No. 16577562

in the future spacenoid fashion will involve skirts with spats underneath

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 16:27:45 UTC No. 16577566

>>16577526
its an interview like the ones that nsf gets

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 16:36:31 UTC No. 16577573

>>16577053
>it's real
why would you can all your hard work? if you've already made the assets for it, bizarre. leftism is a mental illness.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 16:38:21 UTC No. 16577574

>>16577562
this this THIS THIS THIS
ELON don't let us down

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 16:46:16 UTC No. 16577577

nothing to spehs about-

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 16:49:57 UTC No. 16577580

>>16577573
They're just now finding out that most of their ideological movement over the last 15 years was entirely astroturfed and that nobody ever really liked them.
>>16577577
The NOTAM system went down for a little while yesterday, did that cause any problems?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 16:53:39 UTC No. 16577584

>>16577075
>only major cities on trajectory are in Nigeria, India and Pakistan
Rename it Klansman's Hammer

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 17:14:30 UTC No. 16577596

>>16577053
>>16577580
If the modmaker has removed the engine because he doesn't like the part's inspiration being made by a "hoomun rites abooser", why would people suggest he replace that engine with engines made by the Chinese Communist Party, renowned for murdering hundreds of millions of people and abusing hoomun rites all day long? It's idiocy, Elon's infractions pale in comparison to the CCP.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 17:18:37 UTC No. 16577600

>>16577596
its the current thing, elon bad

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 17:22:37 UTC No. 16577604

>>16577004
There was a pic that described how the impact probability for asteroid was initially steadily raising as they refined the orbital parameters, so the possible area was steadily decreasing, until it decrease enough that Earth was not in the area anymore, then the probability falls to 0

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 17:23:41 UTC No. 16577605

>>16577577
spehs is very quiet

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 17:24:06 UTC No. 16577606

>>16577596
Is Nertea a tranny?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 17:25:27 UTC No. 16577608

>>16577562
there's no underwear in space

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 17:26:12 UTC No. 16577609

>>16577600
whats elon actually done? i heard he sperged out over immigrants on twitter. Other than that, all hes done is be in charge of a govt agency for cutting bureaucrats and red tape (a universal good), and being associated with Trump who's only fault seems to be deporting illegals who also happen to be murderous rapists. Also some bravado about taking over greenland before the chinks do.
Is that it? seems pathetic to me.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 17:26:32 UTC No. 16577610

>>16577584

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 17:26:41 UTC No. 16577611

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1887550861695422477

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 17:27:27 UTC No. 16577612

>>16577606
i infer so, trannies seem to be savants for artistry or coding, but using their brains outside of that seems impossible. Quite a waste

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 17:29:56 UTC No. 16577616

>>16577606
>homestuck avatar in proximity
the odds are high
>>16577608
spats > commando
fight me bitch

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 17:30:03 UTC No. 16577617

>>16577611
11 launches in 7 years is depressing

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 17:30:54 UTC No. 16577619

>>16577612

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 17:32:47 UTC No. 16577621

>>16577609
many of these people default hate billionaires but Musk has opposed many of the democrat talking points after 2022 so its not only the stuff that has happened lately, its a more long term thing

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 17:33:45 UTC No. 16577622

>>16577619
nice

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 17:39:29 UTC No. 16577627

>>16577619
Funnily enough both poisons came from the same place, it turns out.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 17:40:40 UTC No. 16577628

>>16577609
the salute seemed to be the final straw for them

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 17:42:45 UTC No. 16577631

>>16577612
I always thought homestuck was a real girl or even pooner thing, but maybe also being into rocketry pushes it into tranny territory.

Yusef at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 17:44:05 UTC No. 16577632

>>16577609
People are seething about USAID being deleted by DOGE because they think it's aid and not an unaccountable arm of the CIA. This will continue for two years because to get the "rape anon in a dungeon for 200 years" bill passed you need to name it "puppies and rainbows and kittens for everyone forever" so everything sounds like a good thing if all you do is read headlines and start seething. There were also some questionably legal democrat funding streams in there as well, so they're panicking and using every channel they have to whip up their base into a neurotic frenzy. Hence our (formerly male) space game enthusiast replacing the raptor with a powerpoint engine that looks the same and does the same stuff but is Chinese.
Honestly after four years I forgot how annoying these guys are when they seethe all the time

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 17:45:06 UTC No. 16577634

>>16577632
kek I forgot to change my name back

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 17:48:16 UTC No. 16577637

>>16577606
he's the guy in the middle
he also got hired to work on KSP 2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6XFxyeciMQU

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 17:49:33 UTC No. 16577640

>>16577632
nigger

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 17:49:52 UTC No. 16577641

>>16577628
hope he did it on purpose to wind them up

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 17:50:33 UTC No. 16577642

>>16577640
it's a funny joke in light of our new lolcow, schizoposter.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 17:51:34 UTC No. 16577644

>>16577642
I'm in on the joke, I was still inspired to make the image just now
remember: ironic shitposting is still shitposting

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 17:52:39 UTC No. 16577647

>>16577632
>People are seething about USAID being deleted
Why do they think non-americans have a right to american's taxes? How can they construe this as taking away people's rights? Also gaza condoms lol.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 17:55:36 UTC No. 16577651

>>16577647
>Also gaza condoms lol
Blatant isreali requested program to flatline gazas fertility rate so they can be replaced by higher fertility jews.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 17:56:00 UTC No. 16577652

>>16577616
>fight me bitch
George Lucas already made the decision
who am I to question it

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 17:57:16 UTC No. 16577653

>>16577004
scientists will meet in april or may, and the risk is still above 1% then they'll recommend to the UN that action will need to be taken to deflect the asteroid. evacuations of large parts of the earth are on the table.

if a mission needs to be launched, it will probably have to happen before 2028. can we build a weaponized version of DART in just a couple of years?
https://arstechnica.com/space/2025/02/thanks-to-nasa-you-probably-wont-have-to-worry-about-this-asteroid-killing-you/

if it impacts the earth, the impact could be on the scale of meteor crater in arizona, ~1.2km wide, 170m deep.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meteor_Crater

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 17:57:19 UTC No. 16577654

>>16577647
That's not the point, it isn't even that. USAID is how the intelligence agencies move people and resources to destabilize regions of the world without oversight by anyone in the federal government
Anyway the budget was double NASA so I'm glad it's gone whatever the purpose

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 17:59:18 UTC No. 16577657

>>16577653
>Bad news everyone! We need to evacuate the entire equator into your country! No they can't go home after!

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 18:00:58 UTC No. 16577660

>>16577653
>can we build a weaponized version of DART in just a couple of years?
Probably not but they should try

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 18:02:06 UTC No. 16577661

>>16577660
Why can't they just crash a starship into it?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 18:03:58 UTC No. 16577663

>>16577661
we'd need an environmental impact statement on how it'd affect the native plover population on the asteroid

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 18:04:19 UTC No. 16577664

to be honest nothing of value would be lost

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 18:05:42 UTC No. 16577665

>>16577653
>can we build a weaponized version of DART in just a couple of years?
Uhh yeah? Launch providers can clearly throw mass simulators together for their rockets in a matter of weeks when they need to. Strap one to a COTS kick stage and you’re done.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 18:06:03 UTC No. 16577666

>>16577664
If it crashes into the mid atlantic it could create a mega-tsunami that wipes out the eastern sea coast of the US

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 18:06:06 UTC No. 16577667

>>16577664
>asteroid projected to land in india
>1.8 billion indians now need to be relocated to the west
forget DART launch nukes at it

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 18:12:56 UTC No. 16577671

>>16577666
What are you smoking?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 18:14:49 UTC No. 16577673

>>16577671
geology

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 18:15:41 UTC No. 16577674

>>16577666
>>16577671
satan is the father of lies

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 18:16:52 UTC No. 16577675

>>16577654
>USAID
>8% of BBC income
Absolute state. Keep at it Elon et al! Roll those heads!

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 18:17:55 UTC No. 16577677

>>16577513
Berger coping with NASA reacting to Trump's request

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 18:18:39 UTC No. 16577678

>>16577677
>>16577675
maybe berger lost his USAID money and is out for revenge

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 18:20:13 UTC No. 16577680

>>16577653
>I was just a child when the stars fell from the sky
>but I remember how they built a cannon to destroy them

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 18:23:08 UTC No. 16577684

>>16577562
I think she has boyshorts rather than spats but I like the way you think my friend.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 18:24:09 UTC No. 16577686

Musk will unironically be in jail in 4 years. If SpaceX doesn't get nationalized and he'll keep his voting power, the Mars plan can still proceed

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 18:24:46 UTC No. 16577687

>>16577562
the only spats i know are the ones that go on your feet. what is this new devilry?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 18:25:23 UTC No. 16577688

>>16577686
>Musk will unironically be in jail in 4 years
For what crime?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 18:26:56 UTC No. 16577690

>>16577688
treason, corruption, among other things. he'll be sharing the cell with others in the Trump administration

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 18:28:29 UTC No. 16577692

>>16577688
Insulting and disempowering Democrats

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 18:28:41 UTC No. 16577693

>>16577687
I think only japan calls boyshorts spats

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 18:28:42 UTC No. 16577694

>>16577690
beginning of the end. the walls are closing in.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 18:29:42 UTC No. 16577695

>>16577694
anon, the democrat propoganda machine is being dismantled
they won't be able to run an effective campaign in four years

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 18:29:44 UTC No. 16577696

>>16577693
>not learning everything you know about women's garments from anime
i seriously hope you guys don't do this

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 18:31:29 UTC No. 16577698

>>16577696
I'm pretty good at unhooking bra straps
lots of practice

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 18:33:24 UTC No. 16577700

>>16577698
just be careful your mom doesn't notice they've gone missing from her drawer

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 18:33:42 UTC No. 16577701

>>16577695
The next 4 years are going to be all the campaign they need. The country is falling apart and we're about to deploy into gaza so jews can get a new beachfront resorts.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 18:34:00 UTC No. 16577702

>>16577651
>condoms can only be used on dicks
>they can't be used as convienent IED containers

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 18:36:11 UTC No. 16577704

>>16577701
Sure. And Canada is going to be first 51st state, and we're going to send the troops into Panama.

Have you ever considered that maybe you're just a little bit retarded?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 18:41:27 UTC No. 16577706

>>16577693
ahh i see, it's some Oriental Sorcery. thanks

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 18:44:24 UTC No. 16577707

>>16577706
did the image not clue you in that I was a massive weeb

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 18:47:55 UTC No. 16577709

>>16577707
was just lost with what spats were and there are several possible sources for a new term. it didn't sounds like a jap word either so i thought it was some new Young Persons Lingo i missed out on.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 18:48:02 UTC No. 16577710

>>16577701
Hey didn't they cut off your subscription to Politico?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 18:59:52 UTC No. 16577716

>>16577704
>>16577710
Just wait untill more planes start falling out of the sky.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 19:00:18 UTC No. 16577717

>>16577701
Go cry on /pol/ about it, loser.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 19:04:47 UTC No. 16577719

>>16577717
Sorry you guys can get back to crying about slight changes to KSP mods now.
We both know there's literally nothing going on with starship right now, so really who cares what we talk about.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 19:06:36 UTC No. 16577720

>>16577719

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 19:07:49 UTC No. 16577721

>>16577719
its just SOOOO boring only having the routine Falcon launches and subsequent landings you know? Its just a overall very quiet spehs couple weeks

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 19:09:45 UTC No. 16577722

>>16577721
This but unironically

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 19:13:15 UTC No. 16577725

>>16577722
tiresome is what it is

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 19:14:25 UTC No. 16577726

>>16577721
you should watch that last Falcon 9 launch, the landing came down on a herd of deer
it was very funny

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 19:15:19 UTC No. 16577727

>>16577726
oh missed that one, been off a few days. i'll look it up thanks. roasted deer is excellent this time of year.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 19:23:48 UTC No. 16577731

>>16577727
https://x.com/i/status/1886918458928996852
naively downloading only the video results in an mp4 that is 4.4 MB, slightly over the limit or I would post that as well

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 19:30:19 UTC No. 16577734

>>16577731
https://x.com/SpaceX/status/1886913204263026846

watched the launch through to booster landing. was good, and yeah, those little dummies were pretty close.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 19:33:56 UTC No. 16577736

>>16577734
I watched it live

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 19:34:27 UTC No. 16577737

>>16577736
were you one of the deer?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 19:34:57 UTC No. 16577738

>>16577737
don't tell /k/

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 19:37:56 UTC No. 16577740

>>16577738
they'll know to look for the one with singed tail that cant hear them coming

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 19:38:04 UTC No. 16577741

>>16577734
>sees a light
>runs into it
Why are they like this

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 19:53:08 UTC No. 16577746

>>16577741
nature did not adapt them to be good at dodging rockets.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 19:54:47 UTC No. 16577747

>>16577741
They want to be closer to God

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 19:56:50 UTC No. 16577748

>>16577746
Or cars, for that matter.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 19:59:42 UTC No. 16577750

>>16577741
he thought the quickest way to get past it was to cross the pad to the other side

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 20:04:41 UTC No. 16577753

>>16577053
>>16577596
What a loser, this is what EDS looks like huh

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 20:06:52 UTC No. 16577754

>>16577631
>>16577612
today I will remind tem

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 20:08:08 UTC No. 16577755

>2.3%

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 20:08:39 UTC No. 16577756

>>16577755

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 20:11:37 UTC No. 16577758

>>16577647
>Why do they think non-americans have a right to american's taxes?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 20:12:36 UTC No. 16577760

>>16577755
100 bucks says it goes up to 10%

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 20:13:46 UTC No. 16577761

>>16577755
Hit us hit us hit us hit us hit us hit us

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 20:14:59 UTC No. 16577763

>>16577701
This anon also thinks Trump colluded with a hostile foreign power to steal the 2016 election, said to drink bleach as a cure for covid etc.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 20:17:40 UTC No. 16577764

>>16577755
sauce me baby

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 20:18:05 UTC No. 16577765

>>16577755
Nothing ever happens

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 20:18:46 UTC No. 16577766

>>16577758
I just want you to acknowledge that the issue here is that the middle is trying to import the left side of this graph, and not the existence of the middle

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 20:23:03 UTC No. 16577768

>>16577755
it keeps going up
please hit 50%

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 20:31:22 UTC No. 16577770

What did the war criminal mean by this?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 20:32:16 UTC No. 16577771

>>16577755
if dubs it nukes Islamabad

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 20:36:47 UTC No. 16577773

>>16577770
Jim going from bad to worse? Seems unlikely, Nelson? I think he wanted to just retire, no? And it wouldn't be surprising for him to go back to the project he created. One of the guys he had on the shortlist for administrator?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 20:39:21 UTC No. 16577777

>>16577770
Additional context.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 20:39:53 UTC No. 16577779

>>16577777
wasted quints

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 20:40:58 UTC No. 16577780

>>16577777

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 20:41:43 UTC No. 16577781

>Someone who was generally well liked in the space community has recently been hired to lobby for SLS and Orion in this, their most desperate hour.

It's Mountain Dew man isn't it

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 20:44:51 UTC No. 16577783

>>16577773
Ballast isn't well liked and hardly a surprise for him to defend SLS. Most likely Bridenstine.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 20:45:59 UTC No. 16577784

>>16577777
Big Jim?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 20:54:17 UTC No. 16577788

More than 500 of the 4700 Gen1 Starlinks have now reentered.

I want to smell the aluminum oxide that they make before it makes the ozone dead again.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 20:59:38 UTC No. 16577794

>>16577783
Yeah OK I'm in acceptance. He was already lobbying against SpaceX so it really isn't that much of a stretch.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 21:02:48 UTC No. 16577799

>>16577784
>>16577783
Berger said it was not Bill Nelson.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 21:08:32 UTC No. 16577804

>>16577780
This board has one post per minute. Fuck off back to /b/ with that faggotry.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 21:09:00 UTC No. 16577806

>>16577770
>>16577777
>>16577784

Is this it?

https://www.theartemisgroup.space/

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 21:10:15 UTC No. 16577808

>>16577784
We all know he joined the dark side.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 21:13:14 UTC No. 16577809

>>16577806
Serious question for Americans, why is lobbying a thing? Why bother voting if you have systematized bribe? In my country we do not do this

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 21:13:46 UTC No. 16577811

>>16577502
lmfao

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 21:15:35 UTC No. 16577812

>>16577809
Lobbying/corruption exists everywhere, don't kid yourself.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 21:16:06 UTC No. 16577813

>>16577770
I hope it’s Bezos or Free, that would alleviate the anxiety of this post

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 21:16:42 UTC No. 16577814

>>16577813
We know the answer
>>16577806

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 21:17:12 UTC No. 16577815

>>16577809
>In my country we do not do this
Sure you do, you just put a different name to it. In my country, politicians tend to fuck off to "Service Advisory" companies, where they quite openly use the network they built up during their political to lobby for money.
They just call it "advice".

It's just like how we don't call things corruption, but a "service for a friend".

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 21:17:56 UTC No. 16577816

>>16576997
Happening cancelled, nothing will happen.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 21:19:31 UTC No. 16577819

>>16577637
Looks full of estrogen food.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 21:20:51 UTC No. 16577820

>>16577806
I'm still not sure if it's actually him. Orion and SLS aren't specified, and fillings go back to October last year.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 21:21:11 UTC No. 16577821

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3s3MPliCgcQ

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 21:22:13 UTC No. 16577822

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 21:23:04 UTC No. 16577823

>>16577822
That's what happens when you only have daughters, I guess.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 21:23:19 UTC No. 16577824

>>16577816

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 21:23:43 UTC No. 16577825

>>16577822
He's almost got a point, but the reason why they use men instead of women is because men make better snap decisions in a crisis and make them faster. If physical strength or endurance in high exertion activities is ever a requirement, a man is also a better choice.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 21:25:01 UTC No. 16577827

>>16577816
>>16577824
are they using an off the shelf nuke or are they using a nuclear shaped charge? you can get like 5x more performance out of a shaped charge casaba howitzer

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 21:25:54 UTC No. 16577828

>>16577822
>women are generally better candidates for long term spaceflight
>equal performance, but lower mass
kek, no they aren't. women on average aren't nearly as mentally stable as men.
using this argument, midget men should be the only astronauts around.

ultimately scott manley is still a liberal who works for apple, it's not surprising he falls in line, even decently intelligent people fall for peer pressure when they're normalfags.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 21:28:28 UTC No. 16577830

The systems get automated into unmanned spacecraft long before the constraints that make being a woman into a perfect candidate happen.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 21:29:07 UTC No. 16577833

>>16577822
>equal performance
eh

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 21:30:31 UTC No. 16577834

>>16577755
total mumbai death

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 21:31:11 UTC No. 16577836

>>16577822
I want less women, I just disguise my position as merit-based

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 21:32:16 UTC No. 16577837

>>16577822
>equal performance

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 21:32:24 UTC No. 16577838

>>16577822
wonder how women would have handled the core drilling and general gear hauling the guys had to do on Apollo

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 21:35:24 UTC No. 16577842

>>16577788
Is there any tracking resource for predicting where and when they come down? I watched a bunch of the early trains in the sky before the sunshields, it'd be really neat to watch some of them reenter if I was lucky enough to be under one at the right time.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 21:36:26 UTC No. 16577843

>>16577822
What a retard, god damn.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 21:38:24 UTC No. 16577845

>>16577827
The interceptor would just use a standard warhead of the US military. I guess it makes sense to use a warhead that already exists in such a study because if this study gets ever seriously considered, there is probably not enough time to develop a warhead specifically for asteroid interceptions.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 21:39:07 UTC No. 16577846

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 21:43:06 UTC No. 16577847

why are they trying to save sls? both spacex and blue origin are rapidly expanding. there's plenty of jobs to replace the lost ones.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 21:43:39 UTC No. 16577848

Wouldn't they need to know 100% that it's going to hit earth if they wanted to redirect?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 21:44:36 UTC No. 16577851

>>16577848
nope

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 21:45:04 UTC No. 16577852

>>16577838
yeah, once you're on a surface the physicality of men is nearly required
it's beneficial for spacewalks due to how terrible our EVA suits are right now, but even the wicked witch of the west is up there taking care of it for eight hours a shot right now, and she's not exactly the hugest buff lesbian we've sent up there
>>16577842
no
>>16577845
the pit is the hard engineering part, and can just be pulled out of its casing and wrapped in borohydride or whatever it is that casaba howitzers are made out of
it's just a shell that goes over the existing bomb, and can reuse a lot of the existing bomb

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 21:45:54 UTC No. 16577853

>>16577848
the ars article said 1% is enough to organize an international response

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 21:46:05 UTC No. 16577854

>>16577847
Because those jobs would go to a single state unlike with sls

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 21:46:37 UTC No. 16577855

>>16577851
>>16577853
What if they redirect it straight into earth?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 21:48:42 UTC No. 16577857

>>16577855
nobody wants to breathe in the global ash from vaporized third worlders

🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 21:51:13 UTC No. 16577858

Space exploration fags value shit like finding wacky new rocks and dust over the lives of the humans actually strapped to said rockets. Billions spent on a rocket that blows up anyway which could be spent on feeding starving children. Lol

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 21:52:29 UTC No. 16577859

>>16577822
Maybe space going people should have their legs amputated to optimize for mass?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 21:52:44 UTC No. 16577860

>>16577858
bad bait

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 21:53:03 UTC No. 16577861

>>16577858
Yawn. If the Left actually cared about children, it wouldn't abort them.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 21:56:20 UTC No. 16577862

>>16577822
>Females are bett...ACK

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 21:56:38 UTC No. 16577863

>>16577858
larpium

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 21:57:37 UTC No. 16577864

>>16577857
JUST DO IT! Make it crash.
We don't need Bogota, Canaima Park, Mumbai, Suriname, Cameroon, Yemen, Central India!

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 21:58:10 UTC No. 16577865

>>16577860
You cannot tell me there are exceptionally interesting things to find on the Martian shithole that warrants the lives lost and money burned. It’s a dust bucket of zero value. End of story.

🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 21:58:51 UTC No. 16577867

>>16577039
>>16577231
>>16577488
A pack of H1B's sucks elon cock, shocker.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 21:59:59 UTC No. 16577868

>>16576999
>>16577028
Neither of you have shot a gun in your life.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 22:01:00 UTC No. 16577869

>>16577035
Does he make you chant this every morning when you come in to work under threat of deportation, Arpit? Seems like something he'd do.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 22:02:20 UTC No. 16577870

>>16577452
I honestly think they're bots.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 22:03:02 UTC No. 16577871

>>16577822
>men and women are not equal

NOOO SCOTT WHAT ARE YOU DOING?!?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 22:05:03 UTC No. 16577872

>>16577642
what's a lolcow?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 22:08:02 UTC No. 16577877

>>16577859
ESA is already hiring disabled astronauts, not sure how they will launch them though

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 22:09:27 UTC No. 16577879

>>16577858
thats not what the picture depicts retard
finding rocks interesting =/= having "empathy" towards the rocks
two very different things

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 22:09:33 UTC No. 16577880

>>16577695
The propaganda machine works for both sides and Musk has been a benefactor of government gibs for decades. A regime change shuffles who runs the oligarchy--it doesn't displace the oligarchy.

Look at how dumb the Musk sycophants are in this thread--they'll happily throw themselves under any bus for him. He is jewish after all.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 22:10:32 UTC No. 16577881

>>16577872 A person you follow for the purpose of laughing at them because their life is a trainwreck.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 22:10:34 UTC No. 16577882

>>16577877
Isn't it better to hire someone missing a leg or two? They don't need it in space and it's less mass to launch after all.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 22:12:05 UTC No. 16577884

>>16577882
Not if a missing limb is THE reason to hire them

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 22:16:04 UTC No. 16577887

>>16577881
Ah, so you're here from leddit/twitter.
That makes sense.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 22:20:07 UTC No. 16577891

>>16577871
I often watch this guy and start to vibe with him, and generally agree on stuff. He has a level head, for the most part, explains his reasoning is a fairly bulletproof way, and then he goes off and says something fucking stupid like this.
Do all Troons have this issue? He checks most of the boxes, but then utterly disqualifies himself. I wonder who made him do this? Has his reasoning been infiltrated by PEER PRESSURE? It seems like that is the case, I thought this lesson was learned between 4th and 6th grade, but he seemed to have skipped this lesson and should be demoted from a Manly. How about Girly? Or pussy whipped? Whatever. Fly safe asshole.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 22:20:26 UTC No. 16577892

>>16577887
I just don't much like laughing at people because it stops being funny and circles around to being depressing.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 22:21:25 UTC No. 16577893

>>16577887
lolcow is a pretty old term newfag

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 22:25:33 UTC No. 16577895

>>16577893
lolcow is an old term, from reddlt.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 22:27:12 UTC No. 16577897

>>16577895
It predates Reddit and comes from SomethingAwful. Lurk more.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 22:31:11 UTC No. 16577901

>>16577777
Jim Bridenstine I bet

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 22:32:08 UTC No. 16577902

>>16577897
>In group status
>Pride in esoteric, useless internet knowledge
if you say so, ledditer.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 22:32:40 UTC No. 16577903

>>16577822
I also want more female astronauts but not for the reasons scott listed.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 22:33:28 UTC No. 16577905

>>16577852
>once you're on a surface the physicality of men is nearly required
and mars will be just more than that. seems like moving shit around in less than 1g is even more of a pain in the ass (and muscles) than down here.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 22:34:43 UTC No. 16577907

>>16577518
Meanwhile, certain OTHER retards would still be trying to run interference for Boeing's embarrassing DEI failure eight months after the fact because a certain candidate suffered a humiliating total defeat and they just can't accept reality and move on.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 22:35:19 UTC No. 16577908

>>16577870
the one who gave that message actually was a bot

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 22:36:43 UTC No. 16577910

>>16577880
>MUSK MAN BAD!
It's okay if you need to cry.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 22:37:02 UTC No. 16577911

>>16577903
TSMT

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 22:37:41 UTC No. 16577913

>>16577867
Why wouldnt I want to suckle his nuts?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 22:38:04 UTC No. 16577915

>>16577902
its basic knowledge if you aren't a newfag

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 22:38:49 UTC No. 16577916

>>16577910
What are you talking about?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 22:40:20 UTC No. 16577918

>>16577915
If that's what you need to believe to feel better about yourself. Clearly it's important to you.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 22:44:13 UTC No. 16577923

>>16577822

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 22:47:29 UTC No. 16577927

>>16577902
he's not a redditor, he is, may allah forgive me, a Goon

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 22:48:18 UTC No. 16577928

>>16577862
Don't expect old Scott Unmanly to repost that science anytime soon. It contradicts THE NARRATIVE.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 22:50:35 UTC No. 16577930

>>16577892
I've never found packs of bullies very funny. I always found myself standing up for the person being bullied. Luckily I'm a very good fighter.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 22:53:02 UTC No. 16577936

>>16577930
You sound pretty tough, anon. Can I suck your cock?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 22:53:25 UTC No. 16577938

>>16577930
what is it about your technique that makes you so good?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 22:53:47 UTC No. 16577939

>>16577927
I only know that as a hocky term.
Honestly I've been around since the IRC era and don't bother learning the lingo because its always lame and used by people who are lame to push in-group status which is lame.

Easy access to the internet was a mistake.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 22:57:17 UTC No. 16577945

>>16577938
There is nothing good about fighting.
Mostly I won because bullies are almost always shitty at fighting which is why the come in packs.
The people that have something to prove by bulling are almost always mega pussies.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 22:59:29 UTC No. 16577947

>>16577918
you asked what it was then started a tantrum
its a very common term, just not something that has become popularized outside the chans like "based" for instance

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 23:00:32 UTC No. 16577949

>>16577939
https://sonichu.com/cwcki

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 23:02:23 UTC No. 16577952

>>16577939
>Easy access to the internet was a mistake.
Easy lots of things were mistakes, anon.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 23:10:20 UTC No. 16577963

https://x.com/wapodavenport/status/1887624726874403235
>In a letter to acting NASA Administrator Janet Petro, two Democratic members of the House Science Committee, Zoe Lefgren and Valerie Foushee, say they are concerned about SpaceX's conflicts of interests given Elon's role at DOGE.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 23:14:26 UTC No. 16577966

>>16577845
>>16577852
you just kinda replace the second stage of your device with a bunch of beryllium

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 23:14:49 UTC No. 16577968

>>16577869
Not every morning, only the ones where I pull my rosary out of your mom's wrinkled asshole.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 23:17:17 UTC No. 16577969

>>16577963
>SpaceX is NASA's second largest contractor
There will be no justice until everything is ripped up by the roots

Barkon !8v8vr3ErDk at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 23:17:22 UTC No. 16577970

gey

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 23:18:40 UTC No. 16577971

>>16577963
GUESS YOU SHOULDNT MESS WITH A MANS ROCKETS

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 23:18:58 UTC No. 16577972

>>16577970
shut your mouf

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 23:22:48 UTC No. 16577974

>>16577963
I hope the seething is as impotent as it seems. Imagine Elon takes a two year break to fix the entire federal government and then goes back to colonizing Mars. How will the history books on this read?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 23:28:54 UTC No. 16577978

https://x.com/davill/status/1887642502468980769
video

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 23:33:19 UTC No. 16577982

>>16577978
SpinCHADs we are so back

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 23:34:19 UTC No. 16577984

>>16577963
Round those whores up for the firing squad, I'm am so done with these scumfucks getting in our way

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 23:34:41 UTC No. 16577985

>>16577978
NASA has zero seconds experience of spin gravity in space

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 23:36:21 UTC No. 16577986

>>16577985
Now you know that isn't true, they demonstrated it twice with Gemini

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 23:38:00 UTC No. 16577987

>>16577945
this tells nothing

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 23:38:16 UTC No. 16577988

>>16577986
>0.00015 g

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 23:39:08 UTC No. 16577989

https://www.youtube.com/live/FI8C5RZUrbE
sext slut on pod today

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 23:43:53 UTC No. 16577994

>>16577766
>trying to import the left side of this graph
The left side exists within ethnic groups, not just external ones. That said, only retarded, strong-ingroup preferring people will survive the dysgenics crisis.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 23:45:37 UTC No. 16577996

>>16577172
Why all these official russian portraits looks like they photoshopped the face onto random model in uniform?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 23:46:05 UTC No. 16577997

>>16577994
The solution is to remove the necessity of reproduction and random mutations in society.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 23:52:05 UTC No. 16577998

>>16577788
>the ozone dead again.
is a lie made up by DuPont to protect it's monopoly on refrigerants because it's patent was about to expire. Environmentalism is a psyop

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 23:58:04 UTC No. 16577999

Poocifer's Hammer

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Feb 2025 23:59:26 UTC No. 16578000

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 00:01:45 UTC No. 16578001

>>16577997
Free market genetic engineering would probably be sufficient and a lot more moral than conventional eugenics.
Sadly we live in thoroughly leftist times. It's taboo to even suggest there are genetic differences between people, let alone those differences affect the mind, and let alone the differences change between generations significantly. We've such an uphill cultural battle to get any eugenics in time.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 00:05:27 UTC No. 16578003

>>16578001
I believe in China on this. They will force a competition on all fronts including genetic.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 00:06:58 UTC No. 16578004

>>16577822
>better radiation shielding around reproductive organs.
A good joke, and true. But totally superfluous; average age of astronauts is 34, too old for female reproductive organs to function, especially once accounting for a 4 year mission. There won't be any eggs to irradiate.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 00:07:15 UTC No. 16578005

>>16577596
So is that going to come with a matching massive downgrade to its stats too?

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 00:12:35 UTC No. 16578007

>>16578003
Possibly, but with heavy gov't involvement and the general culture of chinks under the CCP, I don't expect too much from it. Still might be nice if they kick stuff off, but I don't think civilization has enough centuries left; 200-300 years at current IQ loss.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 00:14:06 UTC No. 16578008

>>16577978
That’s right, chuds. Blue Origin is innovating. Two minutes and twenty seconds of simulated lunar gravity. Can spacex do that? Think not!

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 00:14:27 UTC No. 16578009

>>16578005
Don't know, bare in mind that's not the mod-creator's plans, it's just the suggestion of someone who agrees with the elon purge.
I really find it astonishing that the modders sperged out in this way, why cause the hassle for yourself?

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 00:19:16 UTC No. 16578014

https://spacenews.com/diu-studying-applications-of-spacex-starship-in-space-refueling/
>Speaking at the Smallsat Symposium here Feb. 6, Gary Henry, a senior adviser at the Defense Innovation Unit (DIU) and a former SpaceX executive, said the agency was working with SpaceX to examine how Starship’s in-space refueling capabilities could support a broader range of users.
>SpaceX approached DIU about how that architecture could be used beyond Starship, an effort that he said started while he was still at the company. “We, when I was at SpaceX, proposed ‘hey, that might be a real cool platform for you to host refueling capabilities that would be of use to the broader community,’” he recalled. “Let’s explore really novel ways to potentially exploit that and maybe help create some standards that would be leverageable by all of you going forward.”

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 00:20:57 UTC No. 16578016

>>16577657
>>16577667
>asteroid redirect mission gets done, obviously by SpaceX
>schizos say it was faked by Elon to make people believe he doesn't want to import indians

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 00:22:06 UTC No. 16578017

>>16577596
liberals embrace china now after the tiktok/rednote psyop

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 00:22:35 UTC No. 16578018

>>16577999
Checked and keked.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 00:23:00 UTC No. 16578019

>>16578014
It would have to be methalox upper stages though right? No point i’m SX making upper stages that bring up kerosene or hydrolox that would be ridiculous.
So… not even BO or Vulcan could utilize it. Doesn’t make sense for New Tron’s tiny ass upper stage. Kek. Stoke is the winner here, I guess (assuming they make it)

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 00:23:09 UTC No. 16578020

>>16577628
dont the libs hate jews? arent they socialists? shouldnt they love hitler?

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 00:24:02 UTC No. 16578021

>>16578016
some irrelevant EDS astronomer would claim that the asteroid was never actually going to impact Earth and that it was just a big PR stunt to inflate elon's ego for saving the Earth

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 00:24:23 UTC No. 16578022

>>16578020
2016 facebook boomer ahhh take my blud

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 00:25:43 UTC No. 16578023

>>16578022
you screenshotted your own aislop post?

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 00:26:27 UTC No. 16578025

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 00:27:14 UTC No. 16578026

>>16578023
no why would i do that

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 00:30:36 UTC No. 16578027

>>16578026
Desire for attention and lack of creativity

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 00:34:29 UTC No. 16578028

>>16578027
>he doesn't use ai to get attention and make up for his lack of creativity
ngmi

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 00:36:23 UTC No. 16578029

>>16577999
nice digits

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 00:38:07 UTC No. 16578030

>>16577895
>>16577887
>>16577902
>>16577918
>>16577939
>he gets this mad at a term used for people that get made fun of.
did you get bullied in school?

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 00:40:58 UTC No. 16578031

lol based berger

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 00:52:32 UTC No. 16578035

>>16577868
>baseless assumptions about strangers on the internet
Shut up nigger.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 00:55:06 UTC No. 16578037

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 01:03:12 UTC No. 16578040

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfs11RIKtI8

has a section about starlink in the middle

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 01:06:44 UTC No. 16578041

https://x.com/davill/status/1887642502468980769
>New Shepard's reaction control system put a new spin on lunar gravity. Here is a cool (albeit dizzying) video of booster and capsule separation showing spin up. We achieved our target of 0.16g, creating a Lunar-G environment for our payloads that lasted continuously for 140 seconds. During this time, the capsule completed approximately 26 rotations at 11 RPM.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 01:07:05 UTC No. 16578043

>>16577822
>equal performance

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 01:08:34 UTC No. 16578044

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 01:12:39 UTC No. 16578045

>>16578044
Wtf who shrank Elon, reverse it right now

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 01:16:31 UTC No. 16578048

>>16578044
diet coke button ftw

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 01:22:31 UTC No. 16578051

>>16577999
drop the hammer

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 01:22:58 UTC No. 16578053

>>16577450
>what a terrible movie
You are on the 'Don't Allow To Orbit' list. Take that back right fucking now.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 01:28:57 UTC No. 16578056

>>16577822
I'll do you one better, Scott. Replace all women with male midgets. Half the cost, as well. (they don't have to know this)

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 01:38:31 UTC No. 16578059

>>16577009
i like the magnetic one
seemed like something that might happen if we evolved with fuck off huge fields around us

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 01:39:48 UTC No. 16578060

>>16578053
>Take that back right fucking now.
i wont. almost everything after orbit was horrendous

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 01:40:54 UTC No. 16578062

>>16578044
Wait, is that the golden pager on the table right there lol

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 01:41:58 UTC No. 16578063

>>16578062
It’s a trojan horse. It’s hooked up to mossad hq via starlink

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 01:45:18 UTC No. 16578066

>>16578044
same energy

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 01:46:52 UTC No. 16578067

the fuck is this? another megaconstellation?

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 02:07:14 UTC No. 16578072

>>16577784
>>16577901
>>16577777
>>16577773

Definetly what berger is alleging, but I have insider info on this and can say confidently that his lobbying efforts are firmly for commercial space companies. He is trying to bring space industry jobs into his home state (and is paying a lot of money to some of these companies to make it happen).

Ignore the EDS in this article, it has good info
https://www.politico.com/newsletters/politico-influence/2024/10/29/trumps-nasa-chief-registers-to-lobby-00186133

>Bridenstine and his former chief of staff Gabe Sherman registered to lobby beginning today on behalf of nine different clients — all of which are involved in aerospace, have ties to Bridenstine’s home state, or both — through Artemis Group, a strategic consulting firm the pair launched last February.

>Their clients include the University of Oklahoma, the state’s flagship college; the Oklahoma Space Industry Development Authority, a state agency to boost Oklahoma’s aerospace industry; the Native American tribe Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma; and aerospace companies Special Aerospace Services, Redwire, Impulse Space, Frontier Electronic Systems Corporation and Agile Space Industries.

Basically OK (under the Space Industry Development Authority) hired him and some of his staff to use his clout to bring more jobs to his home state, which he is accomplishing quite well, they are throwing a lot of money at this (in the 8-9 figure range).

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 02:13:04 UTC No. 16578073

>>16577861
You could say they scrub their launches a lot

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 02:19:11 UTC No. 16578081

>>16578072
what does oklahoma offer spaceflight?

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 02:20:52 UTC No. 16578082

>>16578081
Tribal launch sites for stage 1 nuclear orion drives

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 02:23:07 UTC No. 16578084

>>16578044

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 02:52:22 UTC No. 16578101

>>16578072
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>politico

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 04:00:37 UTC No. 16578131

>>16577868
I'm still waiting for an unwary stranger to enter my home :-(

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 04:04:29 UTC No. 16578133

>>16577172
Based as fuck

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 04:04:33 UTC No. 16578134

>>16577809
it used to be banned when we were a more serious country. from trist v. child, 1874:
>If any of the great corporations of the country were to hire adventurers who make market of themselves in this way, to procure the passage of a general law with a view to the promotion of their private interests, the moral sense of every right-minded man would instinctively denounce the employer and employed as steeped in corruption and the employment as infamous.
>If the instances were numerous, open, and tolerated, they would be regarded as measuring the decay of the public morals and the degeneracy of the times. No prophetic spirit would be needed to foretell the consequences near at hand.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 04:08:31 UTC No. 16578135

>>16577376
>investors pretending they know how to run a rocket company
lol, let's see their CVs
>no successfully run rocket companies
HUH!

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 04:09:39 UTC No. 16578137

>>16577584
>Lucifers Hammer
Some day I'll finish reading that book

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 05:02:13 UTC No. 16578157

>>16577584
>major cities
>Pakistan

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 06:20:23 UTC No. 16578181

https://x.com/Salar__Askari/status/1887689954412683632

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 06:26:14 UTC No. 16578186

>>16578021
You realize, China is going to play that role regardless?
OR, perhaps the US and SpaceX decide to do absolutely NOTHING, assuming its going to be okay, and China decides to put on some dog and pony show with their Long March crap, and claim full credit for saving the Earth.
REGARDLESS of this things chance of hitting us, we MUST ACT. Even if its just a demonstration of power. Mark my words, Trump and Elon will use this to maximum advantage, just like "saving" Butch and Sunni

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 06:34:32 UTC No. 16578189

wow would you look at that? its suckin penis o-clock! boy oh boy how i love to suckin a penis tonight

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 06:35:02 UTC No. 16578190

>>16577999
The only nation in the path with the ability to save themselves is India.
Not my problem. What is ISRO's official stance on this?
YOUR problem. Also, no, you cannot move here, that is not on the list of available remedies. I guess they are working in secret? Because I haven't heard shit about their defense plans. They have one, right?

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 06:48:21 UTC No. 16578193

2024 yr4 status? I hope it fucking strikes this shithole of a planet already

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 07:41:58 UTC No. 16578208

/sfg/ is dead... like it'll be in 2032

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 07:44:22 UTC No. 16578212

>tesla sales have dropped 60% in Europe due to Elons retardation

Lmaooooooi

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 07:48:11 UTC No. 16578214

>>16577700
My mom used to ask me to help her with that when she had a long day at work

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 08:00:00 UTC No. 16578219

>>16578019
stoke is LH2 second stage

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 08:01:39 UTC No. 16578221

>>16578212
>Canadians and Europeans want to buy Chinese cars instead because Elon Man is racism
god i hate liberals

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 08:06:48 UTC No. 16578226

2024 YR4 sample return when

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 08:16:04 UTC No. 16578231

I was promised a Starship on Mars in 2020

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 08:18:43 UTC No. 16578233

>>16578231
based alternate-reality poster, it was always 2024 here

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 08:20:16 UTC No. 16578234

>>16578233
Nah, Elon said in a 2017 presentation there would be an unmanned Starship on Mars in 2020

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 08:28:57 UTC No. 16578239

>>16578234
WRONG
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=etYdq5mufLo&t=2246
inb4
>n-no, it was actually in the 2016 presentation, i s-swear
WRONG AGAIN
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H7Uyfqi_TE8&t=3252s

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 08:31:33 UTC No. 16578241

>>16578239
Ah so he said in 2018 Starship would in 2022 land at least two cargo ships on Mars. I rest my case.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 08:37:31 UTC No. 16578242

>>16578239
>mars landings only delayed by two launch windows after 9 years
pretty impressive compared to the average in the space industry. but of course, the EDS crowd will see this as a failure/scam. Meanwhile, NASA and pockocmoc are 53 and 33 years late, respectively, and counting...

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 08:47:52 UTC No. 16578246

lots of sugarcoating in this thread

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 08:54:17 UTC No. 16578248

>>16578246
I still have hope in Elon and the Mars dream, otherwise, why even bothering with anything at all.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 09:33:23 UTC No. 16578278

>>16578189
why are you so obsessed with penis?

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 09:41:06 UTC No. 16578283

>>16578246
of what?

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 10:56:12 UTC No. 16578310

2024 YR4 has increased probability again; now to a 2.3% chance, or 1-in-43

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 10:58:25 UTC No. 16578312

>>16578190

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 10:59:44 UTC No. 16578313

>>16578312
Designated Shitting Orbit.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 11:20:06 UTC No. 16578316

>>16578310
old news

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 11:20:12 UTC No. 16578317

>>16578312
all that stuff deorbited in by the end of the month. nothing was damaged in the meantime. nothing burger.
>but muh kessler syndrome!
go back.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 12:08:03 UTC No. 16578335

https://x.com/ddavisspaceart/status/1887704705494618388

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 12:11:03 UTC No. 16578340

>>16578317
You can dismiss kessler syndrome as a meme - but it doesn’t negate the fact that shards can still fly into the Station, and that Indians are genetically predisposed to litter everything the touch and are generally an ugly, stinky subspecies

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 12:47:17 UTC No. 16578355

>>16578212
euros are NPCs
it's also why they cannot into space
sad!

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 13:06:15 UTC No. 16578360

>>16578248
Musk is too busy fixing earth to bother with mars right now.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 13:08:24 UTC No. 16578361

>>16578335
k-keep me posted

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 13:11:39 UTC No. 16578364

>>16578360
You have to remove the FAA and the gov to launch to Mars and create a self sustaining civilization there. Otherwise, they will block Mars.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 13:55:59 UTC No. 16578382

Every day Elon comes one step closer to building weapons for the Department of Defense. Optimus bots will be armed and we WILL have orbital energy weapons and rods from God. Space will be militarized.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 14:05:08 UTC No. 16578389

>>16578340
You now remember that the USA, Russia and China have all done that same exact ASAT test in the past decade.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 14:12:29 UTC No. 16578391

>>16578389
yeah, I know, and I don’t necessarily like those tests. I agree that kessler syndrome IS a meme. But at the same time, short term space debris is still a pain in the ass and a threat to infrastructure and souls in orbit.
Worst case scenario, we can just send a bunch of powdered sugar to orbit and wait like 5 to 10 years for the debris to fix itself. But that’s still a long time where everything will stagnate and present a danger

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 14:15:00 UTC No. 16578393

>>16578335
>pounded
h-hot.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 14:16:57 UTC No. 16578394

>>16578391
dealing with and avoiding kessler syndrome in reality is like having to scrub barnicles and other sealife off of a ship or any other form of maintainance and management.
yes, it's annoying and it takes time and attention, but ultimately it's not that difficult to take care of, it's just something that needs to be done.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 14:17:44 UTC No. 16578395

Elon cucked on his lads spicy tweets. Its over

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 14:20:20 UTC No. 16578397

>>16578395
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1887857977677205649

I'm not so sure

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 14:21:52 UTC No. 16578400

>>16578382
>but he supports china's claims on "Formosa" and does not want America involved in fear of losing his Tesla market.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 14:22:19 UTC No. 16578401

>>16578395
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1887867644814020902

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 14:27:04 UTC No. 16578405

>>16578400
lol, nobody is going to war over Taiwan. Literally nobody recognizes it as a country.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 14:27:59 UTC No. 16578407

>>16578401
we gaan

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 14:33:36 UTC No. 16578412

>>16578405
correct, china won't either, all they'll do is cope and seethe.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 14:34:28 UTC No. 16578414

>>16578412
Yeah, just like Russia totally wouldn't invade Ukraine.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 14:34:42 UTC No. 16578415

>>16578397
> the person I don't employ should be fired!
ok what about the guy you fired?

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 14:35:37 UTC No. 16578417

>>16578401
Elon can't ever take a loss. It'll be the end of him.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 14:37:00 UTC No. 16578420

>>16578417
no, that is what got him this far

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 14:37:08 UTC No. 16578421

>>16578414
it'll only happen if something goes bad for china and they need a massive distraction.
in that case they'd fail miserably because they don't have the ability to do any of the shit they say they will, no matter how much thirdies squeel, the US navy would still wipe the floor with them because they lack operational independence and initiative.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 14:40:25 UTC No. 16578424

>>16578421
americans are delusional
>inb4 retard calls me chinese

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 14:44:40 UTC No. 16578429

>>16578424
>starving foreigner chooses to forget about the existence of the US Navy and US Air Force
lmao, this century is going to be the American Century, too

And we're taking Mars

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 14:47:03 UTC No. 16578430

>>16578429
>amerilard thinks it's still the 80's

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 14:54:49 UTC No. 16578433

>>16578429
>this century is going to be the American Century, too
Very questionable. The US government is still regulating away innovation and using regulatory capture to suppress competition they don't control, like it's still the end of history and America is the only real country. This has led to China passing the US on several emerging technologies now. If Elon didn't exist and we didn't have SpaceX or the regulations being cleaned up, then it wouldn't even be a question. The US would be unable to compete with China. It very much is not a guarantee right now.
>US Navy
I'm pretty sure they outbuild us by 200x. I know our boats are better, but are they 200x better?
>US Air Force
Modern wars have proven the importance of drones. Guess which country has the more robust drone industry? We regulated ours away. Guess which country is more capable of manufacturing them at scale? Should be obvious, we handed them our entire manufacturing base.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 14:55:10 UTC No. 16578434

>>16578401
OH. MY. GAWD. IS THAT.... No.... it can't be... Stop. My heart. A HECKING TWITTER POLL???? OMG BASED BASED BASED THIS IS SO BASED AND REDPILLED! LORD ELON WILL ALWAYS FOLLOW THE TWITTER POLL!!!

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 14:56:30 UTC No. 16578435

>>16578433
Why does the american government self sabotage so much?

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 14:57:19 UTC No. 16578436

>>16578435
Whatever you want to say about China, they're all Chinese.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 14:59:01 UTC No. 16578437

>>16578433
>200x
most of what they build are absolutely tiny brown-water navy boats, check the actual tonnage of each navy.
>le drones
what kind of drones?
because rinky dink quadcopters are not doing shit against an actual supersonic vehicle.
the main problem with a war with china, is that china may do a lot of final assembly in their country, but the moment their supply chain full of western components stops, that all grinds to a halt.
(that's not to say america wouldn't feel it either, but we can at least move final assembly of all these things back to the states, china most definetly cannot produce it's own zeiss mirrors for instance.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 15:02:14 UTC No. 16578441

>>16578434
seething

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 15:05:21 UTC No. 16578443

>>16578437
>most of what they build are absolutely tiny brown-water navy boats
American hasn't built an aircraft carrier since 2017, and that one took 12 years.
China has built two since 2017 and rumor has it is gonna launch a 3rd this year.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 15:06:20 UTC No. 16578445

>>16578441
Yeah I am.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 15:07:01 UTC No. 16578447

>>16578437
>rinky dink quadcopters are not doing shit against an actual supersonic vehicle
What about 10,000 of them?

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 15:11:51 UTC No. 16578452

>>16578437
Brother you're coping hard. Our parasite leaders sold off our capabilities. Our only tenuous hold on power is financial and monetary, but everything that backs that up is disappearing.

🗑️ Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 15:12:22 UTC No. 16578454

>>16578437
This is not really the case at all. Read the hundred+ page report Rubio put together. You think time froze in the early 2000s.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 15:13:04 UTC No. 16578455

>>16578443
yes, and?
nta but they're regular non-nuclear carriers which means a lot less internal space for aircraft/spare parts/rockets/bombs and far less operational endurance. and china themselves aren't even intending to use them to contest US carriers because they know it's a bad idea, they're meant more for ASW than anything else with the amount of dipping sonars they have.
he's right that a lot of chinese ships are just patrol ships with maybe a few anti-ship missiles, there's a few big ticket items like the carriers but china's nowhere near US tonnage.

all of this is of course ignoring the fact that all of these new ships are being staffed by people that have never had a large navy before and have no experience with large scale naval actions, on top of having a far more rigid and authoritarian command structure which means decisions happen much more slowly and far less independence in the heat of the moment, which is exactly one of the major things that fucked the russians over in their little 3 day to 3 year escapade in ukraine.

ultimately it's not gonna happen because business is still too good for china to consider ruining their economy over it and xi just got a very good recent example of a dictator being lied to by a bunch of yes-men that his army was strong and powerful and paying the price for it.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 15:14:32 UTC No. 16578456

>>16578455
>it's not gonna happen because business is still too good for china to consider ruining their economy over it
I remember people using this exact logic to argue russia wouldn't invade ukraine lol

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 15:14:34 UTC No. 16578457

>>16578452
i'm not though, i never said china wasn't a threat, i'm saying that ultimately you should take their capabilities with a grain of salt because it's attached to an authoritarian shithole that builds whole cities made of sand through sheer economic peer pressure and has an extremely poor military history.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 15:16:45 UTC No. 16578461

>>16578456
i added a little caveat right after the fact, please do not read so selectively.
it all depends on how delusional xi is, i personally think he's at least smart enough to take the russia-ukraine situation as a cautionary tale and that there's a very good chance all the people under him are are blowing smoke up his ass because that's what he wants to hear.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 15:16:51 UTC No. 16578462

>>16578455
>nta but they're regular non-nuclear carriers
Wow, it'd be a shame for your argument if the nearly completed type 004 was nuclear wouldn't it?

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 15:18:21 UTC No. 16578463

>>16578462
it really wouldn't, still no experience operating carriers, and china themselves aren't trying to use them to contest US carrier dominance.

it's also funny how china whines about carries being "over" in their propaganda because of their super duper ultra impossible to stop hypersonic meme missiles but then builds a bunch of carriers themselves.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 15:19:07 UTC No. 16578464

>>16578421
Why would the US Navy get involved over some foreign island, which isn't even recognized as a country? You seem to forget the

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 15:19:07 UTC No. 16578465

>>16578461
>i added a little caveat right after the fact, please do not read so selectively.
I did read it but the caveats retarded. Instead of making him more reluctant to attack it'll make him more likely, not only did ukraine not cause a war with nato but xi can learn from what russia did wrong (mainly not enough troops) to succeed where russia failed.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 15:20:45 UTC No. 16578466

>>16578464
why would china risk a death by cop scenario?
seems kinda stupid don't you think?
if you have some leverage with the chinese, by all means, convince them to do it, US won't do anything right? it would be very amusing.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 15:21:30 UTC No. 16578467

>>16578455
We did this to ourselves in the cold war too, overhyping soviet capabilities. I think it serves special interest groups at the end of the day. None of these threats are that credible if you really think about it.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 15:22:20 UTC No. 16578468

>>16578463
>china themselves aren't trying to use them to contest US carrier dominance.
>china is just building nuclear aircraft carriers for funsies and memes, they not gonna actually use them!
Your an idiot

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 15:22:40 UTC No. 16578470

>>16578465
the not enough troops problem in their case can only be fixed by employing an army of fishing boats since their military transport ships do not have anywhere near the carrying capacity needed.
those civilian ships would get absolutely slaughtered if they tried that.
ultimately i believe chinks are a little more pragmatic than russians and that they ultimately see it as a fool's errand even if they scream and shout about it for propaganda purposes.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 15:23:00 UTC No. 16578471

>>16578445
first you whine and then when you get rebutted you shit your pants
you are an embarrassment

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 15:24:24 UTC No. 16578472

>>16577519
What a tale

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 15:25:06 UTC No. 16578473

>>16578468
no, it's gonna use them, but judging by their overwhelming specialization for ASW i doubt they will use them to contest the far larger and more capable strike package of the US carriers.
this isn't even an "are they good or not" argument anon, chinks are just blatantly showing you through their design decisions that they don't want to use carriers to fight carriers and want to beat US carrier groups through other means while these focus on dealing with subs.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 15:26:16 UTC No. 16578474

>>16577619

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 15:27:38 UTC No. 16578475

>>16578429
>Mars
With the Moon first, right?
Right?!

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 15:29:59 UTC No. 16578477

>>16578470
>this retard seriously thinks a nuclear aircraft carrier will be used exclusively for asw
lmao

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 15:31:37 UTC No. 16578478

>>16578477
meant for >>16578473

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 15:36:23 UTC No. 16578480

>>16578477
idk why you're so insecure about this as it doesn't even concern china's ability to deal with US carriers.
they might find other ways of dealing with them (maybe the hypersonic meme missiles will end up being effective)
but china just doesn't have the experience and infrastructure to deal with american carrier projection, and most certainly not anywhere outside the 1st island chain.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 15:38:51 UTC No. 16578482

>>16578477
>will be used exclusively for ASW
who said that?

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 15:39:39 UTC No. 16578484

>>16578014
Going to help the ROI on space tugs if they can refuel.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 15:42:47 UTC No. 16578488

>>16578480
>idk why you're so insecure
>guy whos insecure about nuclear carrier accuses someone else of being insecure
>>16578482
He did
Being unable to read subtext doesn't make you smart

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 15:47:17 UTC No. 16578491

>>16578474
>i'm not a nazi, I just like prussian history!

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 15:48:24 UTC No. 16578493

>>16578482
>exclusively for ASW
i never said such a thing though, their carriers have some strike groups, they're just much smaller and less numerous, there's a much larger contingent of helicopters with dipping sonars.
china is banking on the inside of the 1st island chain being too hotly contested for US carriers to get in and do their work, they're not expecting to beat them at their own game and it's clear for their strategic posture.
feels to me that you want le ebin china carriers to beat le stupid western carriers and start the glorious chinese century but it's not that simple in carrier operatery.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 15:49:25 UTC No. 16578495

>>16578493
meant for >>16578488

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 15:50:22 UTC No. 16578496

>>16578493
>backpedaling
lmao faggot

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 15:52:19 UTC No. 16578498

>>16578496
how am i backpedaling? that you're too retarded to read the english language is not and never will be my problem.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kCMYfcjqlvI
this might be a helpful resource for you, because mostly is not the same as completely, you got that very wrong.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 15:54:37 UTC No. 16578499

>>16578498
>how am i backpedaling?
>chinas navy can only do asw
>b-b-but I never said their aircraft carriers will only be used for it!
shut up

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 15:56:18 UTC No. 16578501

>>16578491
unironically this, but the other way around

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 15:58:21 UTC No. 16578505

>>16578335
They’re doing this to me at work on monday

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 15:59:18 UTC No. 16578506

>>16578505
They're making you airburst over Los Angeles?

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 16:00:01 UTC No. 16578508

>>16578499
let's see what i said
>>16578473
>no, it's gonna use them, but judging by their overwhelming specialization for ASW i doubt they will use them to contest the far larger and more capable strike package of the US carriers.
oops, looks like you still can't master the english language, looks like what i actually said is just as i claimed, the chinese carrier fleet is specialized for ASW and surveillance, specialized, as an english term, does not mean the object of specialization can only be used for it's main purpose.
also your increasing anger and volatility with each post kind of suggests that you're super invested in this, why is that? because to me this feels like it's a very personal topic for you.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 16:06:12 UTC No. 16578512

>>16578475
Yeah but it will kinda just happen, we’ll be focusing on mars and the moon will just be so convenient it will become american land too.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 16:06:48 UTC No. 16578513

>>16578499
please learn to read what other people are saying. its this kind of basic error which ruins online discussions

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 16:06:54 UTC No. 16578514

>all lowercase
>wrong about everything
>not backing down
Welcome back NTP/Council fag

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 16:07:25 UTC No. 16578515

>>16578508
chinks and their 5th columnists here in the west (oh and also people who are just using china as a political crutch to rag on problems they see in their own country like military procurement issues) are very focused on china's image. if you do or say anything that goes against their preconcieved notions of how the world should view the new and dangerous china they get very irritated.
i usually just implessivepost and get on with it, not worth your energy trying to have a decent conversation with these people.

Captcha: 0SW4G

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 16:11:57 UTC No. 16578517

lmao never thought the /k/ "my scenario stands" poster would show up in /sfg/

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 16:13:29 UTC No. 16578519

>>16578517
who?

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 16:14:42 UTC No. 16578520

>>16578517
who do you mean?

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 16:21:58 UTC No. 16578524

>wake up
>check sfg
>2024 yr4 still hasn't increased its probability from yesterday
disappointed, nothing ever happens

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 16:23:45 UTC No. 16578528

>>16578524
keep faith anon, i'm sure we will watch india get asteroid striked within our lifetime.

🗑️ Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 16:24:45 UTC No. 16578529

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 16:24:56 UTC No. 16578530

>>16578524
Poo in the Loocifer's Hammer will not disappoint us

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 16:25:43 UTC No. 16578531

>>16578529
this is so adorbsballz! WINNING!

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 16:25:53 UTC No. 16578533

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 16:28:21 UTC No. 16578535

>>16578520
>>16578519
>>16578517
i think i'm remembering this faintly.
it was some hyperobsessed chink showing everyone his command: modern operations scenario where china epically beats the US carrier group, and then kept repeating
>MY SCENARIO STANDS.
people then mockingly started saying it back to him, that was the early days of implessiveposting i believe.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 16:34:00 UTC No. 16578539

>>16578535
it was Command: Modern Air Naval Operations you fuckin zoomer.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 16:34:40 UTC No. 16578540

>>16577664
watch it nail the panama canal

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 16:35:24 UTC No. 16578541

>>16578529

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 16:35:44 UTC No. 16578542

>>16578533
All this power & influence and Starship / Mars has advanced… not at all. What even is the point.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 16:44:18 UTC No. 16578546

>>16578542
it has though, just because you want the tests to mean nothing doesn't actually change the fact that starship is continually getting closer to being fully realized.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 16:54:34 UTC No. 16578553

>>16578546
Cool so when is the next test flight?

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 16:55:12 UTC No. 16578555

>>16578553

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 16:56:17 UTC No. 16578556

>>16578553
two weeks

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 16:58:14 UTC No. 16578559

>>16578401
>when your boss gives you a battle rez

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 16:58:20 UTC No. 16578560

>>16578553
what's the point of this question?

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 17:01:31 UTC No. 16578563

>just because you want the tests to mean nothing doesn't actually change the fact that SLS is continually getting closer to being fully realized.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 17:02:22 UTC No. 16578565

Greetings fellow space nerds, I am an space nerd such as yourselves
New episode of WAI is out now
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOiHlIJbtZA
Don't forget to like and suscribe.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 17:03:46 UTC No. 16578566

>>16578565
What phenotype is this?

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 17:08:00 UTC No. 16578570

>>16578563
false dichotomy, SLS uses a different (worse) development philosophy and has only launched once.

reminder, that if you are pretending to be a retard, this is no better than being actually retarded.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 17:08:58 UTC No. 16578571

>>16578542
has to fix problems here on urf first

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 17:09:01 UTC No. 16578572

>>16578566
https://youtu.be/luB9PeSVCCA

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 17:12:19 UTC No. 16578573

>>16578571
if the problem actually directly stops us from going to mars then yeah.
>we want to get to mars
>OH WELL THEN WHY ARE YOU TRYING TO BUILD ROCKET INFRASTRUCTURE ON EARTH HUH? SO YOU'RE SAYING WE SHOULD SOLVE ISSUES ON EARTH FIRST?
you're not being very subtle.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 17:12:36 UTC No. 16578574

How long will it take before /sfg/ admits starship program is dead in the water? No progress, no news, nothing since the abject failure of last test flight.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 17:13:35 UTC No. 16578575

>>16578574
When will you admit you suck cocks?

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 17:13:42 UTC No. 16578576

>>16578574
how long will it take before you get a hobby and stop pretending to be retarded for attention online?

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 17:15:41 UTC No. 16578578

>>16578575
>>16578576
Stage 1: Denial

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 17:15:57 UTC No. 16578579

>>16578574
>mom I posted it again

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 17:17:24 UTC No. 16578580

>>16578574
plenty of progress actually

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 17:18:58 UTC No. 16578581

>>16578535
>>16578517
He would post "My Scenario Stands" when anons would a) figure out he was deliberately hamstringing American forces and b) would repeat his encounters with vastly different results.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 17:20:24 UTC No. 16578582

>>16578578
see >>16578576
you need to get a job

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 17:39:02 UTC No. 16578592

>>16578533
Based

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 17:50:11 UTC No. 16578604

>>16578397
Can I see these "spicy" tweets?

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 17:55:13 UTC No. 16578608

New Hullo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-qLcDLRV2A
Zubrin/Paul Harell hybrid shows off his orbital speed gun

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 18:04:45 UTC No. 16578611

Vast pushed their station launch back to May 2026

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 18:05:37 UTC No. 16578612

>>16578608
tslggs are fun

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 18:05:40 UTC No. 16578613

>>16578570
and yet somehow it has achieved more than starship ever has. Even though it has a "worse development philosophy". Amazing.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 18:06:15 UTC No. 16578614

Neptune chads, why must we suffer?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Missions_to_Neptune

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 18:07:35 UTC No. 16578617

>>16577187
it's a way to denote rank, queer

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 18:28:48 UTC No. 16578630

>>16578613
>failed it's only test mission with a fucked up re-entry that was far too hot.
>constant delays for over trivial retarded shit
>literally just a pork barrel project

so i hasn't done that, and you're only saying this because you are
A: retarded
or
B: pretending to be a retard

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 18:31:21 UTC No. 16578635

>>16578529
Trump looks like shit here, did he die and get turned into a puppet by musk?

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 18:32:45 UTC No. 16578638

>>16578580
can we see this progress?

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 18:35:04 UTC No. 16578640

>>16578574
Elon is too busy playing politics, please understand. No Mars until Earth is fixed

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 18:35:45 UTC No. 16578643

>>16578611
Not surprising, I'm fairly sure they were meant to be launching a small test probe before the station but I've heard nothing about it recently.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 18:37:13 UTC No. 16578644

>>16578617
we know, that doesn't stop it looking stupid though

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 18:38:23 UTC No. 16578645

>>16578638
if you actually cared you would know but this thread seems to be just EDSers seething nowadays

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 18:40:49 UTC No. 16578646

>>16578630
looks like it was a success to me
>>16578645
I do care about starship, but literally all I've seen recently is musk playing politician.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 18:59:40 UTC No. 16578657

>>16578646
>I do care about starship, but literally all I've seen recently is musk playing politician.
Right, Musk should instead come to Starbase and beat all latinx folks working on Starship with a whip.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 19:05:18 UTC No. 16578660

>>16578646
the main purpose is to enable astronauts to reach lunar orbit (where SLS gets cucked to the point of entry because it doesn't have the TLI mass) and then return the astronauts safely with orion.
the heatshield didn't work properly, there was a whole lot of damage control from nasa about it.
the only reason why this is embarrassing is because it's a waterfall development method using old "proven" hardware and they had 20 years to figure it out, they still fucked up.
so no, it was pretty much a failure.
you don't care about any of this though, you're just seething about musk because he's gotten too deeply involved with politics for your liking and because you're directionbrained everything even mildly associated with him must now be "failing".

you're only going to look more retarded the harder you push the starship is a failure meme.

Yusef at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 19:07:12 UTC No. 16578663

>>16578574
How long will it take before you admit your schizophysics are nonsense?

Yusef at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 19:08:52 UTC No. 16578667

>>16578663
don't listen to this man he's not the real Yusef

Yusef at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 19:09:30 UTC No. 16578670

>>16578663
Wtf this isn't me

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 19:11:41 UTC No. 16578673

ah yes, my favorite general
sfg - Schizo Frenzy General

Schizoposter at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 19:14:42 UTC No. 16578677

>>16578670
>>16578667
>>16578663
you stupid H1B's! typical cult of einstein tactics. you'll NEVER take my memedrive from me, i'm going to show it to the world and crash the global gravimetrics market!

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 19:14:48 UTC No. 16578678

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 19:19:35 UTC No. 16578682

>>16578678
kek, this is what no starship launches does to this general.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 19:30:56 UTC No. 16578688

>>16578645
Both types, too, and now we apparently get wumaos, too? Back in the day slow /sfg/ was often decent but now it's just shit flinging general.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 19:34:14 UTC No. 16578691

https://spacenews.com/members-of-congress-raise-conflict-of-interest-concerns-regarding-musks-role-in-doge/

lmaoo, wait till you see which congress member specifically, can't make this shit up

Yusef at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 19:40:38 UTC No. 16578695

>>16578691
Is she in Boeing's pocket or something? Also
>Musk, through DOGE, could access classified or proprietary data, including information about companies that compete against SpaceX for NASA contracts
Realistically what could this even be lol

Schizoposter at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 19:41:39 UTC No. 16578699

>>16578695
I'm coming for you

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 19:42:19 UTC No. 16578700

Hypothetically, if ayys from another universe discovered earth through wormhole jumping, and they could see further than we could see them, could they influence asteroids to strike earth while remaining completely undetected? They have tech beyond our comprehension, infinite delta v and infinite time waiting ability, completely autonomous, resistant to all radiation, can go on the surface of gas giants, venus, mercury type bodies, etc

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 19:42:46 UTC No. 16578702

>>16578691
>canwell
>BlueOrigin woman
lmao

Yusef at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 19:49:08 UTC No. 16578709

>>16578699
you better make sure your first shot lands, faggot.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 19:52:11 UTC No. 16578710

Whats with all the namefags. Fucking idiots.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 19:55:03 UTC No. 16578713

>>16578710
shut up, Anonymous.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 19:56:51 UTC No. 16578716

>>16578660
>the heatshield didn't work properly
it did it's job and protected the capsule

Yusef at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 19:59:51 UTC No. 16578719

>>16578710
you wouldn't get the joke.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 20:01:27 UTC No. 16578722

>>16578716
it ablated in an unpredictable way with highly irregular and dangerous levels of erosion, the heatshield failed to reach safety standards.

Ånonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 20:02:27 UTC No. 16578724

>>16578710
>he doesn't know