Image not available

1080x2400

Screenshot_202403....png

🧵 Top DEI STEM Scholar FABRICATED research

Anonymous No. 16091062

There was a thread about this earlier, but for some reason the jannies deleted it.

Apparently, it has be discovered that one of the top stem education scholars in the world, Stanford professor Jo Boaler, has actually been manipulating and fabricating her research for years. This is a major problem because she is literally one of the top scholar in her field and she is literally at the forefront of neoliberal DEI initiatives and her work is currently being used to completely redesigned the entire grade school stem education system in the state of California. She advocates for standardizing education, eliminating advanced STEM courses and electives, eliminating magnet programs and forms of self-directed and personalized education, and standardizing all curriculum and course requirements. She wants ALL public school students (but NOT private schools) to be taught the same material, in the same classes, using the same textbooks, and she wants to discourage independent study or exploration of other topics until students reach the university level.

The rationale for this is that people like Jo Boaler want all children to be on the same page, and they don't want some children having an unfair advantage, and that also want to discourage the misconception that education is about intellectual exploration or "doing your own research". Instead, the goal of education should be to cultivate "informed citizens" who know to seek out and rely on authoritative sources.

Its funny, because 20 years ago standardizing education and eliminating electives and magnet schools and advanced STEM class was considered a conservative policy. At the time it was called No Child Left Behind and it was a policy of the Bush administration. Today it's the neoliberal left pushing for the standardization of education instead.

https://www.chronicle.com/article/stanford-math-education-expert-has-reckless-disregard-for-accuracy-complaint-alleges


Image not available

1801x1936

il_fullxfull.3009....jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16091054

Google aint answering shit so to the doctors on here, it is normal to be able to touch the proximal end of your tibia (shin)?


Image not available

1000x1000

1710427808968354.png

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16090944

So... in the near future, if not now, scientists and researchers will be able to put a scientific paper into an AI summarizer to get all the TL;DR and they can crosscheck the AI:s conclusions by looking at the paper directly, say to confirm that what the AI is saying is true
This means researchers will be able to digest far more information going forward, and produce more papers as they aren't locked into having to read papers multiple times to understand them

What are the implications of this?


Image not available

665x392

gigachad intellect.jpg

🗑️ 🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16090943

I can barely count to 10.


Image not available

77x35

IMG_6526.png

🧵 Solving difficult integrals

Anonymous No. 16090872

I read that some integrals can only be solved by expanding the integrand into power series. When is this applicable and when is it not? How does one proceed and in terms of what series? (binomial expansion, taylor, etc). How can I solve picrel?


Image not available

224x224

download (2).jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16090852

>baking soda is now nahco3 and not Ca(HCO3)2
I swear /x/ is onto something. Till yesterday I would have sworn my life on the fact it was later


Image not available

976x549

_92917518_hi01770....jpg

🗑️ 🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16090800

Humans be like:
>Oww, a stray dog has a broken paw
>We have to save it!
And at the same time:
>Let's send hundreds of thousands of men to a pointless death.

How does science explain this phenomenon?


Image not available

799x354

1706278351868127.png

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16090746

Well /sci/? How do you think he's doing right now?
>tfw too brainlet to take 24 hours a semester
Feels bad.


Image not available

258x195

download.jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16090712

For those that think in words how fast, linear and normal is your inner monologue? For those who don't think in words, how would you describe what it's like?
Do you have layers of your inner voice going at once?
Do you think anything like you talk?
How are measuring and assessing this? Try this experiment: Say the sentence "I wonder if inner speech is faster or slower than outer speech", first in inner speech, then in outer speech (or the other way around). Did one seem faster than the other?
how on topic does it say before it jumps to something else unconsciously
Are the voices in your head rather incessant or restless, and the energy connected with them is, likewise, restless? Or calm and logical, methodical? Do you have any diagnoses?
In an interview in The Atlantic of Charles Fernyhough's * Voices Within*, a book about inner speech. According to the article, one (uncited) researcher cited in the book claims the pace of inner speech averages about 4000 words per minute which is ten times faster than oral speech
some phmenological research on speech categorises the four kinds aa:dialogicality(inner speech that occurs as a back-and-forth conversation),evaluative/motivationalinner speech,other peoplein inner speech, andcondensationof inner speech (i.e. abbreviation of sentences in which meaning is retained. but, I suspect there's more.


Image not available

279x186

stockimage.jpg

🧵 How far is skills upgrading a national concern for Singapore today

Pls help :( No. 16090690

Pls help this is my graded project ;-;
Anything is appreciated, from sources to analysis anything is good


Image not available

4272x3937

1710362798320867.jpg

🧵 Can you Help me?

Anonymous No. 16090658

I would like to know how to interpret PCA, SNP, etc.
I would like to know where to start to correctly interpret the world of genetic sciences and their "programs" and data.
To this day, I don't know how to interpret even genetic calculators like Vahaduo.
Can any specialist help me? thanks for reading my friend


Image not available

2181x1441

soyence stupidity.jpg

🧵 Ridiculously incompetent Harvard astrofaggots embarrass themselves yet again

Anonymous No. 16090652

10 years ago jewish moron Avi Loeb of Harvard astronomy publish a paper claiming to have found evidence of >muh alienzsth based on seismometry data, but in fact the "evidence" was created by a Truck driving past the seismometer.
Loeb then waste millions of dollars to recover his imaginary >muh alienzsth evidence from the ocean floor, but instead only collected terrestrial muck, which they then spent the past 10 year claiming was >muh alienzsth

https://hub.jhu.edu/2024/03/07/alien-meteor-truck/


Image not available

2048x1364

1710909518466468.jpg

🗑️ 🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16090651

>Climate change will cause agricultural failure and subsequent collapse of hyperfragile modern civilization, likely within 10–15 years. By 2050 total human population will likely be under 2 billion. Humans, along with most other animals, will go extinct before the end of this century. These impacts are locked in and cannot be averted. Everything in this article is supporting information for this conclusion.

https://medium.com/@samyoureyes/the-busy-workers-handbook-to-the-apocalypse-7790666afde7

Is this essay real and factual?


Image not available

700x392

images - 2024-03-....jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16090634

I think I found a way to make explosives from saw dust.
Step 1.put pine sawdust in a blender and then onto a coffee filter
Step 2.do acid base extraction by mixing ethyl acetate, hydrochloric acid and the liquid and then extracting the liquid at the bottom with droppler or separation funnel
3.mix what is now phenol with nitric acid and sulfuric acid
You know have picric acid which is more explosive than tnt made from wood!
It can also be used as a bullet primer


Image not available

640x480

IMG_1866.jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16090605

Top 10 Math, Physics, and Science YouTube Channels of all time
1. Isaac Arthur
2. Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell
3. Numberphile
4. Veritasium
5. Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky
6. Vsauce
7. The Math Sorcerer
8. Richard E Borcherds
9. Closer To Truth
10. 3Blue1Brown
11. SciShow
12. History of the Universe
13. PBS Space Time
14. Sabine Hossenfelder
honorable mention award : minutephysics, Mathologer,
National Geographic, The Royal Institution, Big Think,
Arvin Ash, World Science Festival, The Institute of Art and Ideas, Ted,
Science Time, Cool Worlds, Aperture, Fexl


Image not available

306x405

1708576090228901.png

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16090594

Our entire technological infrastructure is built on sending excess electricity into the ground. What happens once earth gets fully charged?


Image not available

655x402

chrome_LVdQawIWfG.png

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16090471

presented without commentary.


Image not available

720x716

Screenshot_202403....png

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16090466

interested in homemade fuel. i want to know how i can test the produced synfuel to see what it actually is, the octane/cetane, purity, etc.
these garage pyrolyzers and gassifiers are very impricise and create very different products based on temperature and even stuff like the type of wood used.
also how sensitive are engines to octane or impurities? because it does me no good if the fuel destroys my engine in 100 miles or something.
and what about detergents or other additives? i have no idea what they put in fuel to make it run cleaner/better.


Image not available

2049x1012

210927162612-mich....jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16090419

feasible or greentard cope?


Image not available

1x1

Cognition The 1s ....pdf

🧵 Cognition: The 1' and 0's of Life

Cognitionee No. 16090336

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1whKWHNKwQ3vwknh6tVitF-RoCDtGbM5P/view?usp=sharing
https://cognitionee.blogspot.com/


Image not available

1439x1138

93457y955432876.jpg

🧵 Literally cancer

Anonymous No. 16090289

>Colorectal cancer rates are up 30% since the 1990s
>Increases across all demographics
>Even young adults under 30

What the fuck is going on


Image not available

1052x1046

steeltest.png

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16090280

Are you smart enough to be a steel-smith?


Image not available

1170x946

Cen4.jpg

🗑️ 🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16090238

Why is eating breakfast, lunch and dinner anti-science?


Image not available

3000x2991

KIMG0965_1.jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16090211

It's okay to be wrong and retract papers that need to be corrected. Where a scientist becomes an aberration, and no longer a scientist, is when they refuse criticism and tout themselves as an expert.