𧡠Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Tue, 17 Sep 2024 15:55:01 UTC No. 16384742
Why donβt modern day scientists know what philosophy is? Do they not realize that theoretical physicists canβt avoid taking philosophical positions?
Also, why is semantics killing science?
𧡠Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Tue, 17 Sep 2024 15:41:19 UTC No. 16384727
Science still can't explain why the candle goes off or why the water level raises
𧡠Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Tue, 17 Sep 2024 14:13:31 UTC No. 16384664
What correlation(s) can be drawn in suicide rates between the sexes?
𧡠Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Tue, 17 Sep 2024 14:10:14 UTC No. 16384662
Retarded question, in my CS classes we accessed a database through the school website which looked like a regular command prompt but the teacher said it was linux and all the commands were slightly different. Is this just some kind of web based linux server? Does it mean their website runs on linux?
𧡠Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Tue, 17 Sep 2024 14:02:44 UTC No. 16384657
>Homo erectus is still alive in Africa
𧡠There is no such thng as an "unfalsafiable theory"...
Anonymous at Tue, 17 Sep 2024 12:25:42 UTC No. 16384550
Only retarded apes in clothes too stupid to devise an experiment about said problem that can be falsified. You confuse your own ignorance and low IQ with reality and what is possible, sad....many such cases in modern science.
𧡠Xuwei Nuclear Heating Plant
Anonymous at Tue, 17 Sep 2024 11:47:53 UTC No. 16384523
Will this kind of nuclear industrial heating offer a significant competitive advantage to the Chinese petrochemical industry? Or will it make no difference?
𧡠Why Can't Scientists Predict Shit
Anonymous at Tue, 17 Sep 2024 11:11:52 UTC No. 16384492
ποΈ π§΅ Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Tue, 17 Sep 2024 09:29:28 UTC No. 16384407
As well as race, there a humans who are *different* via monarch blood type, Acid/Aqua Blood. Most humans on this planet have Aquatic Blood, but I know I have Acidic Blood and everything is wrong for me. I'm instinctively against the system and a new one should be built for me.
𧡠Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Tue, 17 Sep 2024 08:59:23 UTC No. 16384373
>infinity of nothingness
>lives for finite time
>dies
>another infinity of nothingness
𧡠I'm the first unofficial human trial for this invisibility dye
Karael Zexceed at Tue, 17 Sep 2024 08:55:08 UTC No. 16384364
I saw this was done successfully in mice so I tried it on myself. Ofc this is the cheap version with mustard since I don't have 20+ bucks to spare for concentrated tartrazine.
But yea if some of you madlads wanna try this, just rub yellow food coloring in your skin and it should become see-through.
Works way better in mice due to their skin thickness and my crappy ingredient.
Here's the experiment video I only got 4 views lol.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=daM
ποΈ π§΅ Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Tue, 17 Sep 2024 08:47:23 UTC No. 16384350
Will the kikes destroy ISS to prevent ESA from provins Kikestein wrong?
https://www.esa.int/Enabling_Suppor
𧡠paradoxes
Anonymous at Tue, 17 Sep 2024 08:43:35 UTC No. 16384345
It is commmonly said that "This sentence is false" is a paradox because if it is true, it follows that it's false, and if it is false, it follows that it's true, and both are contradictions. But "This sentence is true" is just as meaningless, without such contradictions. If we say "This sentence is true" is meaningless because of an infinite regress of self-reference, then isn't "This sentence is false" meaningless for the same reason, which makes all the business about paradoxes superfluous?
Alternatively we could say that "This sentence is true" is meaningless because there is a lack of content, nothing it refers to by which we could determine whether it is indeed true. The same goes for "This sentence is false". And in this case we don't even need infinite self-reference to explain the meaninglessness or incoherence of the sentence - the actual issue is the use of the concept of "truth" within a sentence.
ποΈ π§΅ Radiometric dating Debate
Anonymous at Tue, 17 Sep 2024 04:50:15 UTC No. 16384212
How reliable is radiometric dating to determine how old things are? One of the main arguments that people like Apologists like to use is that they show how unreliable these methods are (mostly focusing on carbon dating specifically) in determining how old the Earth is. I would appreciate if anon's who actually know a lot about this stuff weigh in because I'm not even gonna pretend to know how any of this shit works.
ποΈ π§΅ Lazy Fuck
Anonymous at Tue, 17 Sep 2024 03:34:34 UTC No. 16384147
How the fuck do I motivate myself to study and learn again? I'm 22 and I'm trying to do a transfer in the spring and I wanna learn what I can or need to learn for Math and Computer Science in under 4 months.
𧡠Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Tue, 17 Sep 2024 03:02:25 UTC No. 16384118
Intelligence is a mental illness, prove me wrong.
𧡠Asteroid PTS Mini moon for 2 months?
Anonymous at Tue, 17 Sep 2024 03:01:25 UTC No. 16384116
https://www.livescience.com/space/a
Hello /sci/ im curious. Can this actually happen in the real world? An asteroid that just orbits our planet for 2 months? This seems like something out of a video game but i dont know you tell me if its possible.
ποΈ π§΅ Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Tue, 17 Sep 2024 00:41:20 UTC No. 16384002
Science has spoken!
https://x.com/sciam/status/18357208
ποΈ π§΅ Indisputible Evidence For The Existence Of God
Anonymous at Tue, 17 Sep 2024 00:39:23 UTC No. 16383998
The thread we had earlier today on wearing aristocratic 18th century clothing in high crime/violence ghettos was POWERFUL, you usually can't find stuff of that quality on /sci/.
When I heard those gunshots go off in that Screwly G video I just imagined myself in that environment sipping tea with queen Victoria the first, with a rather smug and jubilant facial expression FOR SPRITUAL POWER. God is good for this.
For anyone who does not believe in God I can change your mind in just 5 minutes.
Step 1: Open this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQn
Step 2: Picture yourself as the white boy posted in the OP image
Step 3: Imagine yourself in that environment in the Screwly G video gunshots blazing, an erratic and chaotic moment, however you're in pure bliss because you know you've come into this space wearing a SPENDID BLAZER and cravat from one of the most PRESTIGIOUS clothing stores from 18th century BRITAN you sip tea and socialize in your LARGE powdered wig and tell Screwly and his gang "Well, this is RATHER BODACIOUS I MIGHT ADD" while giving a CHEERFUL CHUCKLE and doing a mini breakdance move. Screwly and his gang then approach you and stare at you in a hostile manner. Visualize all of this together for a good 20 minutes.
VISUALIZE ALL OF THIS AND TELL ME GOD DOES NOT EXIST. DON'T JUST ASSUME I'M WRONG, TRY IT. YOU WILL BELIEVE IN GOD.
𧡠Need more dandruff flakes healthily
Anonymous at Tue, 17 Sep 2024 00:34:11 UTC No. 16383989
How do I increase my dandruff production without turning my scalp into a pus riddled wasteland?
𧡠Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Tue, 17 Sep 2024 00:25:37 UTC No. 16383984
when did you realize STEM degrees are a massive scam and that you should have gone to med school or a top tier business school instead depending on your strengths?
ποΈ π§΅ Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 23:54:07 UTC No. 16383951
do you look like a scientist?
𧡠Vacuous truths are retarded
Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 23:34:13 UTC No. 16383940
>given an empty bag, all the marbles in the bag are green
Jews want me to believe this is true.
Even though it is equally as true that all the marbles are blue, which would result in a contradiction where only one could be true.
On top of this, the second premise violates the first by assuming the existence of marbles in the bag, since you cannot ascribe qualities such as color to nonentities.