🧵 quantum faster than light communication with Aliens
LucMorgan1983 at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 23:46:07 UTC No. 16461556
here's the forbidden scientific study that makes it possible to communicate with the extraterrestrials of Proxima Centauri, according to Prof. Simon Holland.
https://web.archive.org/web/2004070
Original article removed after agreement with Seti:
http://robin.ph2.uni-koeln.de:2000/
Original Youtube video with timer:
https://youtu.be/gYFAz7RvMX8?si=qel
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 23:46:03 UTC No. 16461555
Could time flow unevenly without us ever being able to detect it? This isn't about our subjective experience of time passing quickly or slowly, but rather about the actual flow of physical time itself. For instance, could what we measure as a 24-hour day actually be taking 30 "true" hours to unfold in some absolute sense? Consider a video game analogy. Characters within a game experience their world through the game's internal clock. Whether the game runs at normal speed, half speed, or double speed, everything within the game world remains proportional and consistent. The characters walk, interact, and measure time using only elements within their world, and all these elements scale uniformly with the game's running speed. They have no way to detect if their entire reality is running faster or slower relative to our external time. Our universe might operate similarly. All our measurements of time are based on comparing regular physical processes - atomic vibrations, planetary orbits, decay rates, or any other consistent physical phenomenon. If time's flow varied but affected all physical processes uniformly, we would have no way to detect this variation since all our "clocks" (in the broadest sense) would be affected identically. The laws of physics would remain consistent, just as game physics remain consistent regardless of play speed. Just as a game can be paused, slowed, or sped up by the player, our universe's time could theoretically be "running" at different rates relative to some external framework. But just like game characters can't detect if their game is running on a fast or slow computer, we can't detect if our universe's time flow is "fast" or "slow". The universe's time would be like the framerate or tick rate of reality itself - the actual rate at which the "cosmic processor" is processing our reality. The game has its internal clock measuring time in frames/ticks. The computer has its actual processing speed running those frames.
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 22:34:21 UTC No. 16461488
does the moon really pull the water on earth's surface with it's gravity? i find that pretty hard to believe.
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 20:35:55 UTC No. 16461366
would this invention be a good idea? My idea is to BTFO bee attacks by having a fireball suit that the user controls by igniting himself. He would be able to control the duration of his burning (maybe just turn into a fireball for a few bursts) to kill attacking bees around him.
🧵 Do mathematical realists affirm the reality of imaginary numbers?
Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 20:29:54 UTC No. 16461361
🗑️ 🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 19:46:24 UTC No. 16461288
Pathogenic viruses are fake and gay.
Some months ago I got job at the airport.
I encounter 100 -1000's different people every day.
My job means talking directly to many of them face to face all day long.
My new colleagues told me to expect to get sick fairly quickly because of this, they said everyone does.
Indeed, I've seen them getting sick fairly frequently over 6 months.
However, I have not gotten sick once since I started, because I don't believe in pathogenic viruses.
I am fully convinced much of the illness we attribute to viruses is psychosomatic based on people's own belief that other humans are swimming with illness causing virus and getting close to them will make you sick eventually.
Since I know that whole virus paradigm is bullshit, I know that merely encountering many people wont make me sick, so I don't get sick.
What's more, I can more clearly than my colleagues see what makes them get sick - lack of sleep, bad diet, and even yes, the psychosomatic aspect - they are expecting almost desiring to get sick - to prove that the work environment is bad and valid to complain about.
And so they get sick - and then say "See! this is a terrible environment to work in!"
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 19:46:23 UTC No. 16461287
If I wanted to figure out the chances of playing 2 identical games of solitaire, how exactly would I go about doing that?
🗑️ 🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 19:43:46 UTC No. 16461284
What does the science say about this?
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 19:23:26 UTC No. 16461275
ok so all energy and matter originated in the big bang then we're all technically connected through quantum entanglement
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 19:01:46 UTC No. 16461251
realistically how close are we to being able to download japanese into our brain?
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 17:21:38 UTC No. 16461123
When somebody is war with west, e.g. Gaza, is there more incidence of headaches, migraines, in the warzone than normal?
I don't know where to obtain such data. Any help appreciated.
🗑️ 🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 16:29:22 UTC No. 16461078
Drug addicted homeless can make you sick by touching things that you touch. This is at 555 Beale street where they root through my possessions and then touch things in retribution for writing things they don't like. What drugs are these? Touching things the homeless touch will get on my hands and then give me headaches. Any ideas?
Also -
DON'T COME TO SAN FRANCISCO
This is blocks away from the largest food market and traffic corridor in the city. I don't know why these people are in prison when they can make people ill.
🗑️ 🧵 Weird patterns in PA voter rolls.
Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 15:55:28 UTC No. 16461033
What is the scientific explanation for there being repeating patterns in the way ID numbers were initially assigned when the PA voter roll system was consolidated from a county system to a statewide system 20 years ago? This data is from the 2020 PA voter roll dated dec 7 2020.
If you bin all the IDs in bins of 10,000 and count dem/rep/other/voters with history/voters without history/most represented county in bin, you end up with repeating patterns of republican vs democrat in the two largest counties and general patterns in most counties that I feel shouldn’t develop in voters without history. It would seem that somehow the creation of the patterns especially in voters without history would have taken some kind of foreknowledge that these people would never vote. It seems like some kind of algo was used to assign IDs and maybe indexed fake voters or something so you wouldn’t have to keep a list of IDs. It is also suspicious that the patterns are obvious in the two largest counties as if the algo had to repeat. After Philly the statewide system starts so it seems more random how you would expect the whole thing to be.
Link to spreadsheet:
https://files.catbox.moe/fdq4lk.ods
Link to video trying to explain spreadsheet:
https://files.catbox.moe/n4h5nd.mp4
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 14:22:04 UTC No. 16460927
I have 16.5kg (36 pounds) of 99.99% Gallium. Anyone maybe has a use for it and wants to buy some of it? Looking to rid myself of it all, as I bought a land with a lab on it and I'm clearing house to buy a tractor and a cow!
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 14:19:08 UTC No. 16460924
This is the most evil thing I've ever seen. We're fucked becuase some little Swiss faggots want to play god. Your kids and grandkids and all the rest down the line will have their brains eternally tortured and connected to the internet and there is no escape. This is the future you chose.
https://youtu.be/32qlv6dKILQ?si=9qG
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 14:06:41 UTC No. 16460905
What exactly I need to start learning if I want to be able to calculate the most efficient geometry to minimize friction, when designing electro-mechanical shit like actuators, ball screws, etc? Maybe some book recommendations?
🧵 Is the universe unpredictable?
Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 13:15:29 UTC No. 16460864
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 13:10:48 UTC No. 16460861
WHERE IS THE OXYGEN AND GLUCOSE I ORDERED?! THIS IS ABSOLUTELY RIDICULOUS, IVE BEEN WAITING 25 SECCONDS!!!! WHERE IS YOUR MANAGER, I WANT TO SPEAK WITH HIM N O W!!!!!!
🗑️ 🧵 Problem: too much CO2. Solution: Use spotlights to force plants to do photosynthesis at night
Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 12:58:24 UTC No. 16460854
If there is too much CO2 in the air, the most optimal solution is to use plants to turn that CO2 into oxygen via photosynthesis.
You don't need to plant more trees (though doing that is always a good idea), all you need to do is to get the trees you've already planted to work overtime.
Thanks to humanity's complete dependence on plants not just for food, but also for drinks (beer, coffee, tea, etc.), medicines, and even clothes (cotton), we have trillions upon trillions of plants in farms turning CO2 into oxygen. Unfortunately, they only do this during the day.
Photosynthesis needs light, but it doesn't have to be sunlight per se. Any light will work so long as it's strong enough. So you can place spotlights on farms to help the plants do photosynthesis at night. You can even connect the spotlights to wind turbines so they are self-sufficient and don't need to be connected to the power grid.
This could potentially double the amount of CO2 turned into oxygen in the farm, while also increasing food production, and it should pay for itself thanks to that increase in food production.
This is the most efficient, most effective, cheapest way to deal with any extra CO2 in the air because it would turn that CO2 into food at virtually no cost, and could be deployed and be fully functional worldwide in a matter of months.
The current approach of trying to reduce CO2 emissions (which has proven to be a complete failure for 50 years) has 2 inherent flaws:
First off, reducing CO2 emissions does NOT reduce the amount of CO2 that is already in the air. You're going to need plants to deal with that no matter what.
And second, unless you can convince 8 billion people and trillions of animals to stop breathing, the total amount of CO2 released into the air every day isn't going to go down by much anyway, even if you convince everyone to stop using fossil fuels. Increasing Earth's capacity to turn CO2 into oxygen is the only sensible way to go, and only plants can do that.
🧵 Why do we age?
Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 12:52:45 UTC No. 16460846
Is it just the dna getting damaged overtime?
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 12:33:07 UTC No. 16460832
What science found on this board is actually helping science move onwards? It seems like a cesspit of pseudo intellectual marrying wit in attempt to change absolutely nothing and just mir at the current condition of the world. We're meant to be inventing new things and using our minds to accelerate the advancement of humanity, instead it's just lousy intolerable kicking about with the old. You people disgust me, ergh, please kill thyself in the 4th.
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 12:19:02 UTC No. 16460826
In 1986, Lake Nyos, a crater lake in Cameroon, experienced a sudden and deadly limnic eruption.
This event caused over 100,000 tons of carbon dioxide (CO2) to be released from the lake into the surrounding area.
The heavy gas displaced the oxygen in the air, suffocating around 1,700 people and 3,500 livestock within a 16-mile radius.
This is one of the most well-known natural disasters involving a lake releasing gases from its depths.