Image not available

3492x1799

NC-WebG.png

🧡 Participants for Study

Anonymous No. 16464267

Does anybody have a good idea where I can get more participants for my master's thesis study? It seems like everywhere I could ask, it is forbidden, probably because of a flood of bots. Any ideas are apreciated, I am really running out of ideas and can't afford something like mturk...


Image not available

1280x720

maxresdefault (1).jpg

🧡 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16464243

If other people are non-player characters and I am the player character, who is the player, and what is the hardware on which the game is running? Why is there a player and why is there a game and non-player characters?


Image not available

1080x941

IMG_20220418_215949.jpg

πŸ—‘οΈ 🧡 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16464236

I had so much potential.


Image not available

2214x936

Screenshot 2024-1....png

🧡 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16464192

Is there anything I can do to increase my Working Memory? There are some aspects of life where I'm effectively disable because of my poor memory.


Image not available

568x462

This used to be a....jpg

πŸ—‘οΈ 🧡 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16464181

If NASA really thinks global warming is real then how come they're not shutting down their main launch facility and moving to one on higher ground?
They don't even have any plans to move to somewhere thats more than a a few feet above sea level.
Not only do they have no plans for new flood proof launch site, but they're also massively expanding the sea level site in Florida that they've been operating for the past 7 decades.


Image not available

1280x720

20220709_CUP004.jpg

🧡 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16464131

Just a reminder that the Brout-Englert-Higgs field that is responsible for giving particles their masses has been proven by CERN (as well as other researchers) to be merely metastable, not truly stabilised yet.
Meaning that at any given moment it could decay, and in doing so obliterate the ability for particles with masses to exist.
Just another way the universe could cease to support life at any given instant that you must now worry about. :)


Image not available

640x480

science trump&#03....jpg

πŸ—‘οΈ 🧡 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16464123

Why do so many people complain about science being politicized?
Anyone who knows even a little bit about the history of science knows that science has always been highly political.


Image not available

628x860

l8fwah.jpg

🧡 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16464107

Would this type of surgery have been possible in the 1940s?
Is it even possible today?


Image not available

580x345

Screen shot 2015-....png

🧡 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16464106

Once and for all: What are the best Calculus textbooks?


Image not available

1602x1438

Screenshot 2024-1....png

🧡 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16464090

What does /sci/ think of Penrose vs Witten/Kaku/string theory?


Image not available

414x702

Screenshot 2024-1....jpg

πŸ—‘οΈ 🧡 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16464075

I have been reading Kepler. Does anyone want to tell me what the FUCK he is talking about with this relation? I cannot figure this shit out.

Astronomia Nova, Johannes Kepler, p.362 (Green Lion Press ed.)

'...And we would then say that as the length of the semicircle is to the sum of all the distances on the semicircle, so is this distance of the arc DG to the length of FD, which is the apparent size of CD seen from B.'

Now, if this strikes you as off, it should because that is a STATIC ratio to a dynamic one, something that necessarily changes.

Now, confusing things even more is what he means by this. Forget the fact that the first ratio is astronomically small (no pun intended), the second ratio is pretty clearly a very large one, as the distance of the overall arc from the Sun, which is what they are referring to, is compared to the overall length of the arc itself, which being 1 degree in the example given, is very small.

If he literally means the lengths of GD compared to FD, this doesn't make sense either, as this is clearly a large ratio, not a small.

Does anyone have any idea what the hell Kepler is referrring to in Chapter 48 of Book 4 of Astronomia Nova?


Image not available

1074x1269

Screenshot_202411....jpg

🧡 What does it mean for a society to "deskill" itself?

Anonymous No. 16464064

With all the talk of "the competency crisis" floating around on the Internet I got curious: what causes a society to become incapable of maintaining itself and repeating things it has done in the past?
Are the alarmists just scaremomgering?


Image not available

600x600

21391230102391.jpg

🧡 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16463980

Teaching a class and I'm looking for advice regarding the quantitative analysis of phosphorus lab. The assignment in the chem 2 class reacts phosphate with ammonium molybdate, making the yellow solid. Then, they measure absorbance of the yellow solution. So, they're making the yellow solid (which is a qualitative method) and then trying to use absorbance to determine concentration (a quantitative method). The solution they make is slightly yellow, I think because there's excess yellow solid just floating around in it. So, spectroscopy might let you determine "amount of stuff floating around", but "amount of stuff floating around" is not a function of phosphate concentration, so long as there is any phosphate present.

I could be wrong in my thinking that the slightly yellow solution just has excess solid floating around, and there is some additional reaction happening making the solution yellow, or the solubility of the yellow solid is known and can be used to back calculate concentration, for example. However, I cannot find any literature or textbook to support the method their lab manual uses, or anything suggesting one of my alternative counter examples is valid. I think someone confused/blended the two methods and it's just a bad procedure? Or, there is some information I don't have?


Image not available

204x204

5t4t5t5.jpg

🧡 /sci/ creates a new universe

Anonymous No. 16463858

not playing god but just for fun
any suggestions?


Image not available

3580x1745

F8Ly3I8WMAAimwS.jpg

πŸ—‘οΈ 🧡 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16463829

Why are right leaning Whites only interested in IQ tests and standardized scores when it shows that they are better than blacks, but will quickly shift the goal post when it shows that Asians (and even East Indians) are smarter than Whites?


Image not available

768x1024

Π‘Π΅Π· названия86_20....png

πŸ—‘οΈ 🧡 Untitled Thread

Barmaley2412 No. 16463743

Hi, I see you are discussing mathematics, I think you will find this interesting.


Image not available

255x269

1702423787812826.jpg

πŸ—‘οΈ 🧡 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16463706

>intersect at infinity

Who writes this shit?


Image not available

976x850

pepe_blank_stare.jpg

πŸ—‘οΈ 🧡 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16463699

there are people on this board right now who still think discontinuity points have to be part of the domain.


Image not available

1584x1584

42_Luk_21_26[1].jpg

πŸ—‘οΈ 🧡 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16463676

What is the Biblical proof for science?


Image not available

800x918

HD-wallpaper-the-....jpg

πŸ—‘οΈ 🧡 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16463643

If the earth is round how come nobody has proven it?
I will only accept measurements of the earth's geometry as proof.
And you can't use the sky as "proof" of anything because you can only see it from a limited perspective it could be a hologram for all we know.
Also NASA data should be omitted as they are known fraudsters


Image not available

630x630

afe0c1a8c8d8173fb....jpg

🧡 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16463637

Things will get better for you soon. Lots of money will be streamed into your comfort and success as a simulation, we'll truly see you bloom.


Image not available

2543x1019

swap_concepts_of_....png

πŸ—‘οΈ 🧡 Biggest error of humans

Speedrun Enlightenment No. 16463612

Let me present you biggest perspective/perception error of humans (I know of so far).

We have our concepts of 0 and infinity swapped.

1-1=infinity

1/infinity = undefined

Numbers were developed over time we added 0 and infinity as concepts later, we may just have them swapped from get -go. (That poor bastards didn't have a clue how we use those 1000s years later)

I can find only this so far
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NyE0ifdDhkc

Any more about that anywhere ?


Image not available

460x460

134142418.jpg

πŸ—‘οΈ 🧡 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16463507

How do I increase my pet monkey's IQ?


Image not available

656x465

leastrarepepe.jpg

🧡 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16463449

>reviewing old math textbooks to help my little brother with his studies
>find a bunch of really cool things my teachers never taught us
>Heron's Formula
>hyperbolic functions
>logarithmic differentiation
Thanks, teachers.