Image not available

677x680

07d4d711a5072f299....jpg

🗑️ 🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16629429

You can raise your IQ by taking multiple IQ tests and getting better at them
>Nooo that doesn't count you have to take the test only once!!!
Skill/performance is determined by consistency within the long run, maybe it's time to admit that IQ tests are bullshit if you think that practice is considered "cheating"


Image not available

892x892

Lol2.png

🧵 Genetcs for selfish genes

Anonymous No. 16629427

I have been thinking about the concept of selfish genes, as introduced by Dawkins, over the past few days. This led me to the following consideration. From the perspective of a selfish gene, there must be an optimal degree of relatedness, right?

This idea may appear erratic. So, please let me room to explain.

Let’s consider the parent generation. Each parent has a 50% rate of passing on their genes. Basically, yes. However, there is a way for a selfish gene to further increase its chances of being passed on, namely if both parents are related and thus already share a certain percentage of genes.

So, from the perspective of a selfish gene, there must be a trade-off between the harms of inbreeding, such as the activation of harmful recessive genes or a lack of genetic diversity, and the benefits of relatedness through an increased chance of being passed on. Formally, one can write: given a certain degree of relatedness, c is the chance of harmful mutations and recessive genes, etc., while t is the chance of passing on as many selfish genes as possible.

t >> c

How you any idea how formally caculate this?


Image not available

320x240

1718031852211440.gif

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16629394

AYO!

A person on the Moon cannot jump high enough to escape its gravity and go into orbit.

The Moon’s escape velocity—the speed needed to completely break free from its gravity—is about 2.38 km/s (or 2,380 m/s). Even with the Moon's lower gravity (about 1/6th of Earth's), a human can only jump a few meters high at most, reaching speeds of maybe 3-4 m/s. This is nowhere near enough to escape the Moon’s gravity.


Image not available

360x360

th-1851075008.jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16629361

why do my farts smell good but everyone else's smell bad?


Image not available

1276x717

randumb.png

🧵 78

Anonymous No. 16629351

Decided to do some libre study all about randomness. True randomness vs pseudorandomness, RNG, PRNG, the metaphysics, and any and all applications of it.

Any suggestions for study material?


Image not available

1400x700

Star-Wars-Emperor....jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16629340

Why haven't we evolved to shoot lightning bolts?


Image not available

2000x1440

woolly-mouse-2-02....png

🧵 Woolly mice

Anonymous No. 16629284

Has science gone too far?


Image not available

1920x1080

1743011371676829.jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16629225

>Schrodinger's Cat
>the Akashic Records
>The 7 Deadly Sins
>the Philosopher's Stone
>the Ship of Theseus
>The 3 Laws
>The Trolley Problem
>Laplace's Demon
>Time Paradox
>Chaos Theory
>Butterfly Effect
>Memento Mori
>Walpurgisnacht
>Quantum Physics
>Deus Ex Machina
>Reincarnation
>Alternate Universe
>Time Loop
>4 way crop rotation
>Mana/Magic
>dust explosion
>grapefruit juice


Image not available

1236x1142

file.png

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16629180

All of earth is that small? The landmass below must be huge.


Image not available

474x482

Photo 51.jpg

🗑️ 🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16629176

I am not formally educated beyond a high school level in America

Does Quantum physics understand where exactly atoms come from, or what causes them to form the specific atomic mass and electron number they need to be considered the element they are?

I know that "intrinsic" forces (as I call them) account for why, say, gravity, or electro-magnetism will always behave a certain way or seek to behave a certain way. This is because of the inherent laws of physics, and by extension, reality.
But why do quanta arrange themselves to allow for certain elements to be created at certain instances?

Can anybody elucidate this for me, a brave and honest fool?

>pic unrelated
Photo 51 as I understand was the first instance of photographing DNA, taken by Rosalind Franklin in the 50's


Image not available

1080x2340

Screenshot_202503....jpg

🧵 noided void posting pt.2

Anonymous No. 16629154

is there a physicist in the building??


Image not available

647x797

chrome_bf8hcIIKd4.png

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16629147

>a duck standing on a cat observing a flower.

Quantum mechanics broke Niels Bohr's mind.


Image not available

279x181

1722661416088596.jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16629132

this is specifically for you

https://youtube.com/shorts/ELhGZEJPpDY


Image not available

350x399

IMG_1204.jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16629109

How to grow KDP crystals? I tried to dissolve in water but I just got some fucking crumbly crust after few days. It sucks.


Image not available

1070x1407

goodmorning.jpg

🧵 COME IN HERE

Anonymous No. 16629068

What are the health benefits of sparkling water honestly?Does it taste good than normal water??


Image not available

1024x853

korean-golden-lip....jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16629053

Question for geneticists here. I notice most beautiful eastern video game characters have this downwards pointed top lip (tubercle/procheilon?), and, irl, while you occasionally see it in whites/other races it's way more common in asians. Idk if it evolved from diet, sexual selection, whatever, but it's a subtle but important part of cuteness in asian characters. Just check any game character you like and you'll start noticing it. And conversely it's quite rare in western character design.

I just want to know what this comes from. And also why it seems to sometimes pop up in other races. Thanks.


Image not available

803x331

.jpg

🧵 Operations Research

Anonymous No. 16628996

why is it so irrelevant?

>r/DataScience
>2.6 Million subs
>"5,676 hits for Data Science jobs in your area"

>r/ArtificialInteligence
>1.4 Million subs
>"3.556 hits for Data Science jobs in your area"


>r/OperationsResearch
>7k subs
>"54 hits for Operations Research jobs in your area"

what da actual fuck?? someone please explain this to me cause i seriously dont get it.

im about to start a biz m.sc with focus on OR and im worried


Image not available

1024x519

665c994d7d440a001....jpg

🗑️ 🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16628904

If we consider that the population reaches a ceiling of 11 billion and later it will decline as world birth rates fall below replacement levels, we can assume that the human species will become extinct before the year 3000.


Image not available

1100x628

17429864937844111....jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16628903

A question about the nature of time

I was thinking about how time slows as an object approaches the speed of light, and at the speed of light it presumably experiences no passage of time.

There should be an inverse of this - an object traveling so slowly that it experiences all of time at once? That led me to think, the only thing that is not part of the expanding universe is the singularity at its beginning, the source of the big bang.

So I asked ChatGPT a bunch about this, if all of spacetime is compressed into a singularity, would the entire timeline of the universe be encoded within it?

It seems to point to two theories, one that time is a fundamental part of the universe, and one that time is an emergent property.

Another analogy would be that black holes encode information along their event horizon. Let's say the big bang began from a black hole so massive that it contained all the matter in the universe. I suppose it would not be like any we could ever observe, as any black hole within our universe only contains a portion of it (unless there's a "big crunch" in the far future). Perhaps such a massive black hole would also contain its own event horizon at a single point, and therefore all information, including all of time, was encoded at that single point.

The implication of this would be that time, as well as every other interaction in the universe, is analogous to a computer program executing. There are not multiple timelines or possibilities, only one sequence of events which is predetermined from the start. This isn't super relevant if true, because there's no possible observer to decode the information that was encoded in the singularity, at least not one within our universe, and I really don't want to get deeper into thinking about multiple universes, just focus on the one we know.


Image not available

715x404

march weather.png

🧵 Meteorologically-speaking, why is March weather so unpredictable in the Northern Hemisphere?

Anonymous No. 16628884

Where I live, there's an equal chance it's either gonna be 40s or 70s degrees Farenheit at its highest, and a snow day isn't unexpected either. We experienced both a heat wave and a cold wave two years apart during March. November has a similar average temperature, yet it feels more consistent. What gives?


Image not available

475x444

ZvhG8.jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16628855

singularity inside a black hole is actually just a portal to another universe the fabric of space time is so warped that it transitions anything that falls into a 5th dimensional space.


Image not available

1500x1000

Matter-vs-Antimat....png

🧵 How to create antimatter in large amounts.

Anonymous No. 16628843

1. Create a wormhole or Einstein Rosen bridge to another universe where all matter is antimatter
2. Syphon the antimatter from the other universe into this one using magnets
3. Profit from unlimited power of antimatter


Image not available

1400x2100

IMG_0285.jpg

🧵 Are there any vaccines worth the risk?

Anonymous No. 16628802

There seems to be a lot of damning studies about vaccines, but there also seems to be some pretty nasty diseases causing infant mortality.

Which vaccines would you still give a baby?

Can you support your claim?


Image not available

1400x2220

81u8fEKecgL.jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16628742

Thoughts?