𧡠Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 04:02:45 UTC No. 16260639
Scientifically speaking, how much of a threat are airborne microplastics from collectibles?
𧡠Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 03:05:19 UTC No. 16260592
can pharmacy related stuff be self taught?
ποΈ π§΅ Help me I'm desperate!
Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 01:17:28 UTC No. 16260489
Where do I go to learn math all over again and get a good high paying STEM job? I'm tired of feeling like a failure and being a useless NEET. I don't want to feel like a failure anymore. I want to do it all over again and learn math again and master the field(Become PhD?) I don't know where to learn math from basic arithmetic on up with a teacher who will teach me and give me problems to solve and grade them and everything. I DON'T WANT TO BE USELESS ANYMORE!
ποΈ π§΅ Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 01:14:09 UTC No. 16260486
Is there any evidence that this is true?
𧡠Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 00:42:01 UTC No. 16260451
quantum phase slip in squid proves quantum computers will never be more than approximations of simulated annealing
ποΈ π§΅ Mathematical delusions
Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 00:24:57 UTC No. 16260434
Math is not real. Math is created by a man
Itβs funny how atheists claim religion is made up by man
But they worship math that is also created by man.
Hmm sounds like a paradox.
𧡠Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 00:07:56 UTC No. 16260415
Could an ecosystem exist without predators? I understand that predators may be important for the balance of our current ecosystem, but if all predators disappeared tomorrow, following all the population booms, food source depletion and mass extinction, could there, theoretically, exist a state in which all animals are herbivorous?
𧡠Exotic numbers
Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 00:05:50 UTC No. 16260413
Are there any new exotic number systems being worked on? It fascinates me
List of non standard numbers:
Transfinite numbers: Numbers that are greater than any natural number.
Ordinal numbers: Finite and infinite numbers used to describe the order type of well-ordered sets.
Cardinal numbers: Finite and infinite numbers used to describe the cardinalities of sets.
Infinitesimals: These are smaller than any positive real number, but are nonetheless greater than zero. These were used in the initial development of calculus, and are used in synthetic differential geometry.
Hyperreal numbers: The numbers used in non-standard analysis. These include infinite and infinitesimal numbers which possess certain properties of the real numbers.
Surreal numbers: A number system that includes the hyperreal numbers as well as the ordinals.
Fuzzy numbers: A generalization of the real numbers, in which each element is a connected set of possible values with weights.
𧡠midwit
Anonymous at Sat, 29 Jun 2024 22:53:31 UTC No. 16260349
>Looks at some metric that doesnt indicate that race exists
>I have discovered that race doesnt exist
𧡠Zeno's paradox
Anonymous at Sat, 29 Jun 2024 22:32:48 UTC No. 16260335
If you want to reach out or touch something, there are always a infinite number of "halfs" you have to go though, but you get there eventually, so infinity tasks does not take infinite time to be completed?
does nowdays science has a say in this? have our compreension of infinite changed? how far goes our knowledge on time and infinite?
>not sure if this is the right place to post about paradox, if this is not the place it was not intentional, i am very new to 4chan postings
ποΈ π§΅ Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sat, 29 Jun 2024 22:02:10 UTC No. 16260311
Is this true about cyanide poisoning?
𧡠Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sat, 29 Jun 2024 21:41:22 UTC No. 16260289
How long until we develop space travel and take our rightful place as rulers of the universe?
𧡠Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sat, 29 Jun 2024 20:23:06 UTC No. 16260218
What are the best resources for teaching myself the basics of real and complex analysis?
I know they rehash a lot from math classes I took some time ago, so I figure I will need a fair bit of handholding and prep.
/g/ suggested Abbott and Needham respectively for more introductory works and Rudin and Alhfors generally.
𧡠Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sat, 29 Jun 2024 19:40:31 UTC No. 16260182
How come flies are attracted to light but they never get killed by touching the surface of the sun?
𧡠Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sat, 29 Jun 2024 19:39:59 UTC No. 16260181
What would happen if I decided to drink up testosterone? Like gulping down the whole lot. This is gel meant to be applied to bare skin but what if I decided to drink the gel? Would I die?
𧡠Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sat, 29 Jun 2024 19:30:30 UTC No. 16260174
When you think about it observation is the ground of all science, not matter. Matter is just a theory to explain our observations, but observations are the beginning of our knowledge.
Can you name 1 thing you know about matter that didn't come from an observation? Absolutely 100% of our knowledge of an external world is built on observation and it could never be built on anything else. If you take any fact you've learned about matter and ask "how do we know that?" repeatedly you'll always find the chain of reasoning leads back to an observation.
And here's the funny part - even if all of reality turns out to be a "simulation" then your observations are STILL TRUE. It's merely your deduction about your observations that ends up being wrong. That's the entire point of a simulation, to have you make a false deduction based on a real observation.
E.g. if you observe the image of an "apple" and it turns out to be a hologram/simulation what you directly observed (the image) was the SAME you just made the wrong deduction about what that observation meant.
Therefore observation is a more solid ground to build on, because it's the 1 thing that can never be fake even in a simulation. The entire concept of a material world is merely a deduction. It was NEVER known, which is why people can never be sure if we "live in a simulation or not".
And think about it: Observation itself is the only thing that's actually needed, there's no need for an "object" of observation.
With observation alone any possible reality (including those of matter, and even ones without matter) can be fully created.
If you say observation is an illusion then you're also saying that everything else you think you know was built on top of illusion.
>inb4 define observation
Don't ask me, if you follow the scientific view of reality then YOUR view is rooted in observation too so if YOU don't know what observation is then YOU know nothing at all.
Observation is simply a truer axiom of reality than matter.
𧡠Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sat, 29 Jun 2024 19:23:26 UTC No. 16260162
Anons, prepare your minds. Recent breakthrough. mathematically proven existence of Maciej Nowicki's perfect wife - an artificial hyperintelligence.
𧡠Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sat, 29 Jun 2024 19:20:21 UTC No. 16260160
Why do we have so many threads on vaccines, climate change, and renewable energy systems?
ποΈ π§΅ pennsylvania chemtrail whisltleblower data dump
Anonymous at Sat, 29 Jun 2024 18:59:33 UTC No. 16260146
hello,
i am a whistleblower from pennsylvania that went public yesterday with a data dump of official pa dep files that have been altered and deleted. please take a look at the website and my youtube channel. there are about 1700 documents that you can inspect or download,
please help share this info as far and wide as you can. by using the data you can find out what might be happening in your area. mostly deletion of parameters of particulates, ozone and high levels of solar radiation that shouldnt be there. like 12000 to 13000 watts per meter squared going on even at night. the max here should be like 1200 if that on the sunniest of days.
please help me blow this wide open.
please watch this short video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qto
please check out my research
https://suskeeairsquadron.org/
youtube channel
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCA
thank you!!
ποΈ π§΅ Science support
Anonymous at Sat, 29 Jun 2024 18:57:30 UTC No. 16260144
"Scientific" community now has to wrestle with the fact that even the far left of the left doesn't want to support castration of the children now.
What sort of justification will they use now? "Oh we get things wrong sometimes, you shouldn't prosecute us for advocating castration of children?"
ποΈ π§΅ Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sat, 29 Jun 2024 18:27:12 UTC No. 16260112
Has science ever figured out why the 1930s were so hot? Its still the all time hottest decade on record and there was much less CO2 in the atmosphere back then.
𧡠Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sat, 29 Jun 2024 18:21:52 UTC No. 16260104
evolution be like
HONK HONK
𧡠Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sat, 29 Jun 2024 18:19:35 UTC No. 16260102
>almost half of the european and american public believe scientists have created simple life in a lab
>yet scientists dont have a clue and are no close to solving the origin of life problem than 100 years ago
>if you have a personal conversation with these biologists most of them unironically claim its possible as long as there is aloooooooooooooot of time to work with
>yet they cant construct life even with their own intentional actions
how much longer until the meme of abiogenesis gets exposed? why are scientists so afraid of emergence and teleology? is it because its sounds too much like muh sky daddy? Is teleological thinking inherently unscientific?
ποΈ π§΅ Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sat, 29 Jun 2024 18:15:42 UTC No. 16260099
How do incompetent scientists like picrel manage to keep their jobs for so long? Drug addiction has only gotten worse and worse during her tenure.