Image not available

1028x645

sabine.png

🗑️ 🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16271673

I thought this was a science channel


Image not available

1450x1450

crop.jpg

🧵 what kind of spider is this?

Anonymous No. 16271608


Image not available

1280x1810

90dc1b25b3cce8e06....jpg

🧵 Are women meant to be herbivores?

Anonymous No. 16271554

More women than men are vegan (men also eat more meat) and when women eat a plant based diet their periods cramps severity decreases (hurts less). So, are women meant to be herbivores?


Image not available

1025x1551

105233570_p0.jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16271549

I was thinking of p-adic integers and realized something. Both are uncountably infinite, both are completions of a countable thing allowing for arbirtrary sequences in some sense, both have algebraic structure. But p-adics are less schizo than real numbers because, if you define p-adics by an algorithm that computes its n'th digit, you have the following computable properties
- You can add p-adics
- You can subtract p-adics
- You can multiply p-adics
- You can compare p-adics (one-sided computability, i.e. RE)
This is really nice in comparison with real numbers, wherein whatever representation you have, I don't think you have such nice properties. I think comparison being one-sided computable, or RE, forces something like having a real number be represented by its digits. But then addition is not computable.
So my questions are twofold
1. Is there a computable representation of real numbers that has nice properties like p-adics above?
2. If not, why? The construction seems very similar, just with a different metric. So why are p-adics algebraically nicer in this way?


Image not available

763x202

Screenshot 2024-0....png

🗑️ 🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16271543

>The question which befuddled /sci/


Image not available

885x578

Stress_Strain_Duc....png

🧵 Elastic VS Plastic Deformation

Anonymous No. 16271530

Does plastic deformation look different from elastic deformation as the pressure is rising? Essentially, once a material has reached its yield strength, does deformation begin to look different, other than resulting in permanent deformation?


Image not available

300x249

s6r1r.jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16271529

Why do scientist need money to do things like go to space or cure diseases? It's not like money magically creates resources we have all the tools to pretty much do whatever we want, why would money be a factor?


Image not available

1280x720

yuru_camp.jpg

🧵 maybe I should post this in /sqt/

Anonymous No. 16271517

Okey guys, so I'm a trans girl who is into math and need help from super smart math guys like u (apologies for using gendered language. I'm assuming you are all assigned male at birth, but I could be wrong, sowrry ;_;). So anyway, I was toying around with the formula for [math]\tan(\alpha + \beta)[/math] by adding [math]\gamma[/math] and noticed a curious pattern

[eqn]\tan(\alpha + \beta + \gamma) = \frac{\tan(\alpha) + \frac{\tan(\beta) + \tan(\gamma)}{1 - \tan(\beta)\tan(\gamma)}}{1 - \tan{\alpha}\frac{\tan(\beta) + \tan(\gamma)}{1 - \tan(\beta)\tan(\gamma)}} = \frac{\tan(\alpha) + \tan(\beta) + \tan(\gamma) - \tan(\alpha)\tan(\beta)\tan(\gamma)}{1 - \tan(\alpha)\tan(\beta) - \tan(\alpha)\tan(\gamma) - \tan(\beta)\tan(\gamma)}[/eqn]

It looks to me like the numbenator is some form of 1 - 3 + 5 - 7 + ... while denimonator is some sort of 0 - 2 + 4 - 6 + ... In fact, after doing some research I learned are called elementary symmetric polynomials (e0, e1, e2, ..., en):

[eqn]
e_0 = 1 \\
e_1 = \tan(\alpha) + \tan(\beta) + \tan(\gamma) \\
e_2 = \tan(\alpha)\tan(\beta) + \tan(\alpha)\tan(\gamma) + \tan(\beta)\tan(\gamma) \\
e_3 = \tan(\alpha)\tan(\beta)\tan(\gamma) \\
\tan(\alpha + \beta + \gamma) = \frac{e_1 - e_3}{e_0 - e_2}
[/eqn]
Now it's so easy to to generalize the tan(a + b) as a ratio between odd and even sums of elementary symmetric polynomials
[eqn]
e_k = \sum_{1 \leq j_1 \leq j_2 \leq \dots \leq j_k \leq n } \tan(\alpha_{j_1}) \dots \tan(\alpha_{j_k}) \\
\tan(\sum_{k=1}^{n}\alpha_k) = \frac{\sum_{k = 0}^{\lfloor n / 2\rfloor} (-1)^k e_{2k + 1}}{\sum_{k = 0}^{\lfloor n / 2\rfloor} (-1)^k e_{2k}} = \frac{e_1 - e_3 + e_5 - \dots + e_n }{e_0 - e_2 + e_4 - \dots + e_{n-1} }
[/eqn]

BUT, since we mention 1 - 3 + 5 - 7 + ... and 0 - 2 + 4 - 6 + ... this is reminiscent of Maclaurin series of [math]\sin(x)[/math] and [math]\cos(y)[/math], righte?

1/2


Image not available

1600x1600

Telomere-Diagram.jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16271504

>makes you die of old age
Nothing personal, Kid.
Just doing my job.


Image not available

368x368

tychos-geocentric....gif

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16271495

Has the Tychonic model of the solar system ever actually been disproven? It seems most people's criticism of it is that it's "too complicated" and goes against Occam's razor.


Image not available

1080x608

1720358891981.jpg

🗑️ 🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16271465

Are we living in a simulation anon?


Image not available

803x1024

smuggie.jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16271429

I solved Riemann's sums.


Image not available

3072x2048

F0187830-Black_ho....jpg

🧵 Something impossible to know

Anonymous No. 16271397

Say me something you think that
No Matter how advance we are we're never gonna know


Image not available

278x360

360_F_106367941_F....jpg

🧵 /peg/ - Paleontology and Evolution General

Anonymous No. 16271393

Dinosaurs edition, seems to be a popular topic


Image not available

1320x826

Food2.png

🗑️ 🧵 Can you scientifically disproof this picture?

Anonymous No. 16271355

I doubt it


Image not available

993x594

1_JX43Wn-IfiDbMz9....png

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16271314

Why the fuck aren't we sending rovers to every moon in the solar system RIGHT NOW?!


Image not available

1800x1200

btfo.jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16271313

IT'S OVER


Image not available

1200x575

1450278794308.jpg

🗑️ 🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16271278

Where are all the Aliens !?


Image not available

660x371

74315964007-biden....jpg

🗑️ 🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16271250

How do we scientifically explain Biden's mental faculties?


Image not available

724x1050

DeuMath1936_1.jpg

🧵 /mg/ maths general

Anonymous No. 16271237

[math]/\mathfrak{mg}/[/math]

Deutſche Mathematik edition
Talk maths, formerly >>16240472


Image not available

1163x891

GR23mG0XoAAWdd6.jpg

🧵 To what extent is Covid still with us?

Anonymous No. 16271230


Image not available

4000x3000

20240613_163705.jpg

🗑️ 🧵 distancing the retards further

Anonymous No. 16271228

could we convince flat-earthers that the bermuda triangle is actually the outer edge of earth, and that wherever is opposite of that is actually the center? i feel like it would be really funny, and it's definitely something that they would think makes sense


Image not available

600x484

1719914680737224.png

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16271213

Will the far side samples reveal anything interesting?


Image not available

2507x1422

Screenshot_202407....jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16271200

Given the scale of empty space in the universe, is it not analogous to the empty space around protons and neutrons, even atoms themselves?

Really makes one think.