🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 10:52:00 UTC No. 16283384
If it's true that we all exist in a personal biosphere and the people we see are vessels converted for our biosphere bearing a signal of real people in their own biospheres, is there a mental action we can perform that makes our signal in other people's biospheres act how we want?
🧵 cows are carbon neutral
Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 10:30:47 UTC No. 16283375
🧵 /med/ - medicine general
Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 08:17:44 UTC No. 16283291
SOAP edition
Previous: >>16263540
We discuss research, DO NOT offer medical advice (just fucking go see your doctor), make fun of premeds and shitpost.
Keep vaccination/clamping/vitamin K/soliciting advice out of this thread and start your own because it takes a lot of space.
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 08:06:14 UTC No. 16283282
what happens if left and right have kids
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 07:50:56 UTC No. 16283271
How to avoid women from cheating in science and academia? What changes should be applied?
🧵 Number of the beast
Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 07:20:16 UTC No. 16283257
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 06:35:37 UTC No. 16283240
Is it feasible to create an entirely closed off ecosystem and as a result new/unique organisms? No crispr, just extreme or special environmental conditions and pressures. I got my inspiration from fridgebro and his fucked up house ecosystem.
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 06:20:32 UTC No. 16283228
Is it possible to catapult something so fast that it goes around the world before being slowed down by the air? Or would it have to be too fast to stay in the atmosphere.
🧵 /sci/ do you know the meaning behind this shit?
Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 06:02:01 UTC No. 16283210
🗑️ 🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 05:09:41 UTC No. 16283183
Will science ever be able to determine exactly what happens after death?
🧵 Paper rejected, another paper with my core idea is already published
Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 04:18:37 UTC No. 16283153
Hi, today i've received the notification that my paper was not accepted for a conference. The subject is AI.
I submited this paper in april, and between this day and today another paper has been published with the same core idea as mine. Mine was not published on Arxiv, and now i don't know what to do with that paper since the other paper is better. Can you help me please ?
🗑️ 🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 03:28:14 UTC No. 16283129
scientifically, shitalians disgusting
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 02:49:33 UTC No. 16283115
If you remove the Sun.
https://imgur.com/gallery/if-sun-wa
🧵 Books and other resources about Pedagogy.
Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 02:01:24 UTC No. 16283091
Hello /sci/. I think the title says it all.
That aside, here's my shitty sob story, just to rant. Personally, I am failing, and at this point I don't know how to tackle my problems in academia. I never managed to have high grades or even test scores. I have genuinely believed I was lazy, or retarded, and have extensively looked into both of these hypothesis, but it simply isn't true. I put in the hours, made an effort, have taken different IQ tests (most of them showing results above 110, usually at 120, at very least that should get me in the average), etc.
Now I am in Med school, and I score lower than average most of the time. I explored the fact that I might not like what I do, but I actually do love it, and I don't suck working at it, I just can't fucking do well in written tests. I even dominate most oral presentations, but at the end I barely pass. Some of my classmates hate me, because while I am able to answer most logical (and on the spot) questions easily they seem to think I'm some sort of slacker who is wasting his intelligence.
🧵 Creating Domesticated Dragons with Biological Engineering
Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 01:11:13 UTC No. 16283056
Many believe human industiral activity has irreversibly altered the earth's climate. Transportation technology, including cars and air travel, play a significant role in polluting the environment with greenhouse gases. Transitioning away from fossil fuels will not address mobile transport on the ground or in the air, and the current electrical grid is not prepared for a conversion of all the cars on the road and all the planes in the sky to electric actuation, were even the technologies to do so mature and cost-competitive with their gasoline-powered counterparts. In response to all this, you propose to use genetic engineering to produce a flying horse for personal transportation. Using a biological machine would not require electric or fossil-fuel input, and so would not produce any greenhouse gas emissions. If it is engineered not to be a grazer, than not even methane emissions from its excrement would be an environmental concern. A domesticated dragon would cost much less in maintenance, require no traffic stops or registration, and result in unlimited free travel worldwide (subject to breaks for sleeping or rest). Giving your teenage children transportation would be free: you simply get your dragon to reproduce with a neighbor's. You will never need spare parts or maintenance (other than regular veterinarian visits), and are thus insulated from the inevitable collapse of society that will make cars, dependent on intercontinental trade and petroleum distilling infrastructure, unusable for possibly many generations.
🗑️ 🧵 simplify the following hobby sheet:
Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 00:22:24 UTC No. 16283031
(please)
🧵 The relationship between factorials and tetration
Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 23:27:55 UTC No. 16282989
In case any of you are unfamiliar with tetration, it is the next hyperoperation after exponents.
For example 2 tetrated to 5, 25 = 2^2^2^2^2 = 2*10^19728
There is an interesting relationship between tetration and factorials.
Take, x!=yz
(better written as Γ(x+1)=yz)
If y≥2 AND z≥2, then (yz-2) ≤ x ≤ (yz-1) is always true.
Examples:
22=4
x!=4,
x=2
(yz-2): 20=1
(yz-1): 21=2
1 ≤ 2 ≤ 2
24=65536
x!=65536,
x=8.23
(yz-2):22=4
(yz-1):23=16
4 ≤ 8.23 ≤ 16
Take it a bit more extreme:
44 = 10^10^153.9
x!=10^10^153.9,
x=5.2*10^151
(yz-2): 42=256
(yz-1): 43=1.34*10^154
256 ≤ 5.2*10^151 ≤ 1.34*10^154
This goes to show that even for numbers incomprehensibly large, such as 100100, we know that the factorial such that
x!=100100
is somewhere in the magnitude between 10098 and 10099
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 22:37:57 UTC No. 16282944
labchem here. what if I was to demonstrate a fully vetted thesis for why we will all need to be on insect protein by 2035, if we are going to make it as a species on earth? would this help grease the wheel and get more people on board?
🧵 Best average vs best outliers
Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 22:35:42 UTC No. 16282938
Which is better?
🗑️ 🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 21:57:50 UTC No. 16282885
For the love of god someone explain part (c)
🗑️ 🧵 martingale strategy v2
Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 20:29:44 UTC No. 16282788
Was on a gambling site and thought of the martingale strategy and wondered how the strategy would work if the win loss ratio was 2:1 or higher. I might be a retard that doesn't know how to google. if you use the martingale strategy you can lose, if the max is 100, [1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64] 7 times, but with my version, you can lose, [1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 14, 21, 31, 47, 70], 12 tiems.
🧵 Material Science and Engineering is the pinnacle of all sciences
Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 18:33:09 UTC No. 16282672
The amount of money and exceptional minds we’ve blew on a Unified field theory is fucking absurd.
I said it once and I’ll say it again, we’d be better off walking away and coming back to this issue sometime in the distant future and directing our energy on MSE.
No other field of science can even compete with the most bang for your buck regarding MSE. And we’d live in a world mirroring Tomorrowland by the middle of this century if both private and public funding for R&D was redirected.
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 18:01:13 UTC No. 16282636
I've figured out why Western Women age like milk, other than you know, the whole obesity thing.
COLLAGEN.
Bone Broth, Skin on Chicken, Pork Rinds, Organ Meats, Trotters, Bone-in Canned Fish, Pig Skin Stock, the western diet especially urban western diet has practically none of this, especially what prissy women eat. Some asian recipes even add extra unflavored gelatin powder to thicken and improve mouthfeel, the hot&sour soup from a restaurant near me literally becomes an aspic if you leave it in the fridge.
Garlic, Onions, both increase collagen production and repair.
It's why they have shitty joints too.
🧵 I dont really get the solution on this one
op at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 13:47:18 UTC No. 16282374
It states that after we substitute 2 for x we can see that (x-2) is a root of Q, but I dont really see why. After we substitute we get P = 1*Q, how does this prove anything?