🧵 Scientific method includes hiding data that’s deemed “bad guy”
Anonymous at Thu, 24 Oct 2024 03:07:21 UTC No. 16446728
Here’s your science.
>If we publish our results showing no benefit of gender affirming care, then people might unfairly conclude there is no benefit of gender affirming care.
🗑️ 🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Thu, 24 Oct 2024 02:19:16 UTC No. 16446687
Why are there so many people on Reddit who are missing large portions of their brains? Has this coincidence been investigated to any substantial degree?
Is it statins that are dissolving their brains or is something else responsible?
🧵 >all the studies agree!
Anonymous at Thu, 24 Oct 2024 01:25:55 UTC No. 16446628
https://archive.is/h9aDn
tl;dr $10M study conducted in 2015 by a child sex change advocate finds no benefit to puberty blockers but hasn't been published because they don't like the results.
🧵 Why do Wiccans tend to suffer from metabolic syndrome?
Anonymous at Thu, 24 Oct 2024 00:34:07 UTC No. 16446566
Scientifically speaking, why are women who believe in magic so fat?
Is their obesity caused by retardation, or does the obesity cause their retardation?
Do they believe in magic because they are retarded, or because they are fat?
And how susceptible is the average woman to becoming fat or retarded (Wiccan)?
Can this hit any woman, or is it limited to dysgenics?
Discuss.
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Thu, 24 Oct 2024 00:32:15 UTC No. 16446564
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W39
michio says that string theory is correct, and the problem is that the experiments haven't caught up to them. sabine says that michio isn't a serious string theorist. roger penrose is playing dumb and wonders what that has to do with multiverse theory. what does /sci/ think?
🧵 Does anyone here know how one can become a pressure vessel engineer?
Anonymous at Thu, 24 Oct 2024 00:22:56 UTC No. 16446557
I'm interested in becoming one, but it's hard to find much advice online since it's such a niche type of engineering, and there aren't too many people who do this job.
🧵 Stupid shit that doesn't work in real world
Anonymous at Wed, 23 Oct 2024 23:35:09 UTC No. 16446509
I don't care what video and youtuber, or the comment section say say; the answer is still 50/50 , not 2/3. What the actual fuck has this world come to? You can't win minesweeper games with this logic, so why would it apply in real world either?
If host opening a door suddenly gave a door you didn't choose an increased chance, that would imply the host wants you to win a price? Assuming it's not a rigged game show where it was already agreed that you will win (say you're some really big celebrity), why would the game host want to give away free money? That's just dumb. It's this stupid useless shit like this why I never got into math.
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Wed, 23 Oct 2024 22:24:43 UTC No. 16446444
How come modern science doesn't debunk ancient science, but simply actually properly explains what the humans of ancient times observed for milenias?
I mean shit like phrenology, feng shui, sacred geometry, numerology, astrology.
They have enough empirical evidence collected by human observation that they're experiencing real phenomena.
Feng shui literally is ancient metereology and uses empirical evidence about enviroment electromagnetic influences on humans.
Phrenology is also correlated with enough anedotes (AI proves a link between facial proportions and homosexuality and crime).
Sacred geometry seems to be another branch of cymatic phenomena.
Astrology is also proven to be valid using statistical methods.
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Wed, 23 Oct 2024 22:13:27 UTC No. 16446428
can it be pulled off at home without buying special equipment
🧵 Is it a good idea to major in Math and minor in Computer science?
Anonymous at Wed, 23 Oct 2024 20:52:02 UTC No. 16446343
Mathematics course I'm taking has a reputation for being difficult. Only one person out of the initial 20 graduated last year. A lot of people switch their majors (most to comp-sci but considering that it also requires a lot of math I fail to see the point) and even universities.
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Wed, 23 Oct 2024 20:19:02 UTC No. 16446289
3 experiments for the stout copper bars.
For those unaware, the stout copper bars was a popular science showcase experiment presented by Nikola Tesla in front of electric engineers and at world fairs in the late 19th century.
http://www.tfcbooks.com/tesla/1893-
https://waveguide.blog/brief-histor
https://transformacomm.com/en/tech/
Even for those more concerned with mainstream electrodynamics the experiment is a creme-du-jour for understanding impedance and reactance
https://waveguide.blog/impedance-sk
Each of these experiments will largely mimic the setups in the prior links with the difference that i will not be using an over ignition transformer or a high voltage neon sign. As Tesla indicates even the non-safety primitive versions do not display as an astute affect as with a leyden jar discharge.
>In a Leyden jar discharging through a short stranded cable of thin wires these requirements are probably best fulfilled, and the resonance effects are , therefore very prominent. Such is not the case with dynamo machines, transformers and their circuits, or with commercial apparatus in general in which the presence of iron cores complicates the action or renders it impossible. In regard to Leyden jars with which resonance effects are frequently demonstrated, I would say that the effects observed are often attributed but are seldom due to true resonance, for an error is quite easily made in this respect.
(1/2)
🧵 IQ Prediction Debunked
Anonymous at Wed, 23 Oct 2024 19:58:11 UTC No. 16446250
What's the issue with Sasha Gusev? I've read a couple of his articles and he presents clear arguments on IQ heritability being mostly nonsense. Tell me one fundamental thing he gets wrong in that aspect
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Wed, 23 Oct 2024 19:48:44 UTC No. 16446231
I really don’t get why people, even top physics professors, get so spooked by le entanglement. I have two boxes in my hand. I show Alice and Bob two bills: a dollar bill and a hundred dollar bill. I put them in the boxes and shuffle the boxes so that Alice and Bob have no idea which one’s which. I then tell them to go on the opposite ends of our galaxy. Once Alice is a her destination, she opens her box and sees a dollar bill. She then immediately concludes that Bob has the 100 dollar bill. HOLY FUCKING SPOOKY ACTION AT A DISTANCE! ISN’T REALITY WEIRD?!
Fundamentally, all the bullshit “spookyness” stems from the fundamental judeo-christian bias towards determinism. The bit in that thought experiment above that made this whole thing possible is the fact that I could shuffle the boxes perfectly without Alice and Bob knowing which one’s which. And we see this in nature with experimental confirmation of Bell’s inequalities. But christcucks (and yhwhcucks) won’t let their dogma get in the way of empirical facts and start inventing bullshit “interpretations” where le collapse is caused by le consciousness (which is definitely real and not some Platonic idea congruent with the Christian soul).
🧵 Publish or Perish
Anonymous at Wed, 23 Oct 2024 19:28:11 UTC No. 16446204
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=guQ
Give it straight /sci/, how bad is it?
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Wed, 23 Oct 2024 18:52:02 UTC No. 16446167
Whats the science behind Psychopats and how do they compare To street thughs?
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Wed, 23 Oct 2024 18:30:00 UTC No. 16446130
Why did Intelsat explode? Who blew it up?
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Wed, 23 Oct 2024 18:22:18 UTC No. 16446117
What is your wildest scientific theory?
🗑️ 🧵 Bezos wins again
Anonymous at Wed, 23 Oct 2024 17:12:06 UTC No. 16446003
Bezos has just put another spaceship into service, that can land on its own, while Musk needs those silly chopsticks to catch his.
Bezos 1 Musk 0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=604
🧵 If the oceangate sub had not imploded...
Anonymous at Wed, 23 Oct 2024 16:44:58 UTC No. 16445950
Would you still have a bad opinion on its design?
How certain would you be?
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Wed, 23 Oct 2024 16:37:05 UTC No. 16445940
>le magic schizo number suddenly appears
Constants of integration are a psyop, paranoid delusion
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Wed, 23 Oct 2024 16:22:17 UTC No. 16445906
Do you think a lithium ion successor technology will hit consumer markets within the next 10 years?
If so, what will be the winning battery tech?
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Wed, 23 Oct 2024 16:21:23 UTC No. 16445904
even the up-to-date rockets are shit