🧵 How can a planet be only gas?
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Mar 2025 12:22:01 UTC No. 16617772
Shouldn’t the gas fucking leak everywhere? How can it stay “contained” in a sphere? It doesn’t make sense?
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Mar 2025 11:58:13 UTC No. 16617765
>synthesising e.coli to create testosterone and eating it
tell me why i cant do this?
🗑️ 🧵 people's looks and civilization status
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Mar 2025 10:08:02 UTC No. 16617697
all the good looking human tribes are civilized in one way or another
they must operate together as a whole
this was true when evolution was still taking its place roughly 1000 years ago
people had not conquered nature completely
at certain point people stopped worrying about nature and were only concerned about the looks of their sexual partners
this would not be possible if you were surrounder by predative animals and hostile environment
a civilization and walled-in cities have stopped predators from catching humans
this wasnt true in africa or middle east, so people never really went into the point where they only care about looks
they cared about how well a group of people perform regardless on how they would look like
in central to north europe and north east asia however local people were more interested in how do you look to accept you as a partner
a selection of humans had began and it was not about how well they fight wild beasts in nature
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Mar 2025 09:21:48 UTC No. 16617664
so the aliens bombed themselevs?
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Mar 2025 08:12:18 UTC No. 16617634
Is a double ringed planet, with the two rings at an angle to each other possible? With the right conditions of course (orbital velocities of rings are perfect, correct pacing between the 2 rings, etc). I've seen this type of ring system in cartoons, and I wonder if this could work. My hypothesis is that it would be relatively stable for a couple years then start to form chaotic motion, eventually become a single ring system. But what does /sci/ think?
🧵 ADHD IQ test?
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Mar 2025 07:28:32 UTC No. 16617611
I know that IQ tests are used to help diagnose ADHD. Which parts specifically, and is there any way to get this tested (by a professional) without the risk of any sort of diagnosis? What particular profile would a person with ADHD have compared to a normal person?
I just took the CAIT on cognitivemetrics and I scored way, WAY lower on the digit span test than I did on everything else.
🧵 How does the wavefunction "know" what counts as a measurement?
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Mar 2025 06:57:12 UTC No. 16617598
If an electron in the double-slit experiment interacts with something (like air molecules or weak magnetic fields from the slit), in theory, that interaction could store which-path info and collapse the wavefunction. But what if the info gets washed out by noise?
Does the wavefunction "know" exactly how much noise is present and whether the which-path info is truly lost? If the info is technically still there but unreadable, does collapse still happen? Where’s the line between decoherence and "nah bro, still interference"?
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Mar 2025 05:04:30 UTC No. 16617551
they spent 10+ billion of our dollars and ~20 years on this fucking thing just to post like 100 images to flickr since it went operational, and you wonder why people are losing faith in mainstream science
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Mar 2025 04:54:37 UTC No. 16617545
Holy shit, you've just been abducted by an ayy!
You're in a pretty basic room, you hear a speaker reign in, they're speaking english.
>Hey, if you can't identify images 1-6, we're tossing you into the sun.
Well, can you do it?
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Mar 2025 04:44:43 UTC No. 16617538
how am I supposed to reconcile the fact its all just light when its all so different, and coexists everywhere
🧵 Has anyone studied through pic related?
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Mar 2025 04:34:35 UTC No. 16617527
Just asking for your opinion on the course and the text you used.
🗑️ 🧵 Why didn't academia write this paper?
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Mar 2025 03:56:50 UTC No. 16617508
With trillion dollar endowment funds, political support, and a fully supportive media chorus making a media circus about every fake battery eating bacteria that cures cancer, the universities still failed to find the most important result of the century.
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Mar 2025 03:46:42 UTC No. 16617502
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Sp
🗑️ 🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Mar 2025 03:02:03 UTC No. 16617471
What the FUCK is going on, scientifically, in Lubbock, Texas right now
>This is an emergency notification from the Texas Tech PD. An explosion at a manhole has affected multiple locations on the Texas Tech campus, causing widespread power outages to both TTU and TTUHSC. The Engineering Key has been evacuated. We ask that the public avoid campus.
🗑️ 🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Mar 2025 02:49:17 UTC No. 16617464
So in coming years all research is moving to private sector. How exactly do you deal with trade secrets / patents then? What will be DMCA framework for new physical laws usage? Can predictive AI tools claim retroactive royalties if they anticipate discoveries? Will real-time tracking systems automatically bill labs for proprietary physics law usage? Can companies enforce exclusivity to prevent derivative research using patented methods? I.e. just the technicality of setting up billing.
🗑️ 🧵 Scientists take too much credit
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Mar 2025 02:08:03 UTC No. 16617418
I am sure after AI becomes super-intelligent, scientists would take credit for AI too. They will just write some conservation law governing some no free lunch theorem about gradient optimization, and plant their flag saying the whole AI was possible because of that law even though most development of AI would have happened before it. Success has many fathers, as the Chinese say.
🧵 US House Republicans propose to ban Chinese nationals from student visas
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Mar 2025 01:49:25 UTC No. 16617407
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Mar 2025 01:39:49 UTC No. 16617397
>20 more years
>20 more years
>20 more years
when will they just come out and say never?
🗑️ 🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Mar 2025 01:22:59 UTC No. 16617386
> PhD in Physics
> Has no fucking clue what a wavefunction is
> Hasn't studied modern aether theories because they're not """"science"""
Sabine is fucking right. Fucking DEI kikes should be banned from any form of popular science promotion and have all their academic credentials revoked.
🧵 Mnemotic Devices For Math
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Mar 2025 00:35:42 UTC No. 16617346
post any funny or useful mnemotic devices you used while you were learning math.
>bonus points i desperately need help for my precal exam this friday
anons are there any acronyms or ditties that helped you remember all the different trig identities they'd be much appreciated.
>inb4 just memorize it retard
i'm sure this shit will become intuitive and second nature in time, but i need to cram this into my head immediately
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Wed, 12 Mar 2025 23:24:47 UTC No. 16617287
Recursive Model of Reality: A Unified Equation
This model explores the recursive nature of observation and reality, where each layer of observation influences the next, creating a self-organizing, interconnected system. Here’s a breakdown:
1. Base Quantum State Evolution (Schrödinger Equation):
iħ (∂Ψ(t) / ∂t) = Ĥ Ψ(t)
The evolution of a quantum system. It’s the Schrödinger equation but with recursive layers of observation shaping the state over time.
2. Recursive Observation:
Ψ_n(t) = F(Ψ_(n-1)(t))
Each layer of observation (Ψ_n) depends on the previous one (Ψ_(n-1)), creating a recursive feedback loop where reality is shaped by layers of observation.
3. Wavefunction Collapse (Observer’s Impact):
Ψ_collapsed(t) = C(Ψ_n(t))
Wavefunction collapse happens recursively. Each observation influences subsequent collapses, meaning the observer actively shapes reality.
4. Quantum Entanglement and Nonlocality:
Ψ_entangled(t) = Σ_(i,j) c_ij ψ_i(t) ⊗ ψ_j(t)
Entangled particles are recursively linked across distances. Each particle's state influences the other, highlighting a nonlocal, interconnected system.
5. Emergence of Information:
I_n = G(I_(n-1))
Complexity emerges recursively. Information evolves through recursive layers, like how the universe generates complexity through interaction.
6. Unified Recursive Equation:
Ψ_final(t) = C(F(Ψ_previous(t))) + G(I_(n-1))
This combines quantum states, wavefunction collapse, and emergent information, showing how reality evolves recursively across layers.
In essence, this model shows reality as a dynamic feedback loop where observation shapes the system, creating complexity and interconnectedness. Observers don’t just witness but actively shape the system through recursive interactions.
For a more nuanced philosophical view:
https://medium.com/@rmpet/the-kefah
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Wed, 12 Mar 2025 23:23:40 UTC No. 16617285
>be math undergrad
>sign up for physics course (E&M)
>Professor just rants over useless pre-written notes
>no rigor
>no idea what he's talking about
>doesn't do any concrete examples in class
>can't pay attention to a single lecture due to his lecturing style
>skip several homeworks
>show up to exam without studying
>somehow get the highest grade in the class
how do physics majors not kill themselves? this shit is bleak. I'm never taking another ph*sics course again.
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Wed, 12 Mar 2025 21:50:18 UTC No. 16617220
If tall people live shorter lives, and shorter people live longer lives, why shouldn't midgets get to live to be 150 years old? Giants die early, so it makes sense when you think about it