🗑️ 🧵 Untitled Thread
Barkon !otRmkgvx22 at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 11:51:25 UTC No. 16087941
Can we have a Barkon Thread?
What is the opposite of opposite?
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 11:43:46 UTC No. 16087935
If there are an infinite number of whole numbers, and an infinite number of decimals between any two whole numbers, and an infinite number of decimals in between any two decimals, does that mean that there are infinite infinities? And an infinite number of those infinities? And an infinite number of those infinities? And an infinite number of those infinities? And an infinite number of those infinities? And… (Infinitely times. And that infinitely times. And..) …
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 11:23:12 UTC No. 16087915
Why do people lift their arms when they win?
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 10:47:36 UTC No. 16087892
Do your best to explain inter universal tiechmuller theory.
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 10:19:09 UTC No. 16087864
Maglev trains will never meaningfully happen will they? Alternatives?
🧵 Untitled Thread
Barkon !otRmkgvx22 at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 09:57:48 UTC No. 16087841
Science is not the field, science is the prospect. The field concerning science is astronomy/astrology. Science symbolizes the potent data that can be extracted by conscious things from phenomena.
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 09:35:11 UTC No. 16087816
kek, any vaccine cucks care to explain this? And how about the use of high dose intravenous sodium ascorbate to cure rabies and other diseases?
[thinking emoji]
🗑️ 🧵 How were they made?
Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 08:27:52 UTC No. 16087747
🧵 demosponges as animal ancestors
Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 08:03:52 UTC No. 16087724
sponges genetic data show they are ancestors of animals
it all falls in place neatly, this tree is based on genes and it looks very neat on genetic data alone
also an medusa connects itself to sponges more closely than to advanced animals
due to shape of tree its not possible to show it fully on screen as there are 50+ animals in the comparison
🧵 Identifying Quality
Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 06:58:38 UTC No. 16087681
Why is it that some people seem unable to identify quality in something? I've wondered what this in the past and never really found an answer.
Sometimes the reason is obvious, for example if you buy something expecting it to be new but it's broken or doesn't work, that's bad quality and it's easy to identify.
If you look at picrel though, I think it would be obvious to most people the cake on the right is low quality, but the person who made it clearly thinks it's good, at least good enough to sell. You might say it's just a lack of shame or a scam, but I get the feeling someone like this would create low quality things even if they weren't selling them.
Good artists can identify quality in their own work, that's how they know what they're making is good, but some people just can't do it even though they might be equally as creative and understand the art creation process so that nothing is stopping them from creating something good quality.
Sometimes even large groups of people are known to produce things of low quality. Like if you outsource software creation to India the chances are you're going to get something low quality in return whereas other countries don't have that kind of reputation at all. It doesn't cost more to make higher quality software a lot of the time if it has the same feature set, it's more just like these people can't see that what they're making is poor quality and seem oblivious to the fact. Some people just do low quality work and never change, even when good quality examples are right in front of them.
Do you think it's something innate? Or environmental? Or dunning kruger? or just takes practice? Not for creating something of quality, but for identifying that something you created is of good quality, emphasis on the identifying part.
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 06:24:15 UTC No. 16087664
Now that the dust has settled, who the FUCK was in the wrong here?
🧵 Kekule
Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 05:47:31 UTC No. 16087640
What did Kekule dream? Was it an ouroboros? Or the beginning of organic chemistry?
🧵 comb jellies as animals?
Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 05:27:10 UTC No. 16087623
I just can't believe they are animals. Their genes are completely different from animal genes.
In fact even sponges show genetically closer relation to animal genes than comb jellies do.
It would seem to me that they are separate branch of life that just happens to be similar to medusae (transparent, jelly bodies) due convergent evolution since both are sea creatures an this simple body plan is economical and effective for certain sea environment.
They look and act like animals but certainly dont have animal genes.
1. They have mitochondria
2. Animals have mitochondria
3. Mushroom has mitochondria
4. Plants dont have mitochonria.
🗑️ 🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 04:39:02 UTC No. 16087584
Will science approach theism gradually by more discoveries in Fine Tuning and Quantum Physics?
🧵 Useful, yes or no
Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 04:22:54 UTC No. 16087578
https://arxiv.org/html/2403.09921v1
🧵 Room Temperature Superconductor Update
Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 03:11:10 UTC No. 16087532
China Room Temperature Superconductor Researcher Had Experiments to Refute Critics
https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2024/
>Chinese researchers are making variations of LK99 room temperature superconductor materials with more sulfur and copper in the chemistry. They are publishing results with stronger magnetic indications of a Meissner effect. The chinese researchers have been online discussing their room temperature superconducting research and the challenges of the materials. Here are the issues discussed. The current of their material is too small, it is almost impossible to stabilize it.
>What kind of sample this is? It's just a pile of powder, simply pressed into pieces with a mold, and broken into pieces with just a light break. Mr. Guan didn't even dare to touch the silver glue, so he simply pressed a few pieces of indium wire and started testing. Under these experimental conditions, the conductivity is close to that of ordinary graphite, which is shocking in itself.
>To make a good conductive film in industry, it has to be repeatedly purified, polished and flattened. Mr Dai now soaks it in water, takes it out and presses it and then measures it. There is not even a tempering and sintering process. They designed this specifically for a one-dimensional system but the my one-dimensional theory is almost ruined.
Also why the fuck does it take 300 seconds to make a thread now. What purpose does this serve?
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 02:53:10 UTC No. 16087519
Does the color of your iris affect your vision, do people with different iris colors see color and even brightness differently? Also eyes are really gross close up.
🧵 1 + 1 = 2 proof
Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 02:40:54 UTC No. 16087504
Why modern mathematics is like this? Why would you build all of mathematics using sets?
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 01:32:06 UTC No. 16087438
although I didn't need money, I didn't go to college instead I went to /sci/ for years by lurking and shitpositng here, Am I a failure?
🧵 Cognitive Infrastructure?
Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 01:26:52 UTC No. 16087430
What is "Cognitive Infrastructure"?
🧵 WHY DIDN'T WE LISTEN?
Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 01:05:32 UTC No. 16087393
>"On August 10, 1632, five men in flowing black robes convened in a somber Roman palazzo to pass judgment on a deceptively simple proposition: that a continuous line is composed of distinct and infinitely tiny parts. With the stroke of a pen the Jesuit fathers banned the doctrine of infinitesimals, announcing that it could never be taught or even mentioned. The concept was deemed dangerous and subversive, a threat to the belief that the world was an orderly place, governed by a strict and unchanging set of rules. If infinitesimals were ever accepted, the Jesuits feared, the entire world would be plunged into chaos"
>PLUNGED INTO CHAOS
Were the Jesuits right all along?
🧵 Ant cycle
Mr Robot at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 00:57:03 UTC No. 16087378
Have you seen an ant cycle irl?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LEK
🗑️ 🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 00:26:58 UTC No. 16087334
Ya just got scienced :-)
🧵 Does Green Hydrogen Work?
Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 00:15:37 UTC No. 16087321
Can this be fuel for vehicles? Is it feasible or a grift? Is their something better?