🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 15:32:02 UTC No. 16148577
>the human brain works off this algorithm http://www.searchingmagnified.com/?
>knew back in at least 2006 from playing Neverwinter Nights
>domain searchingmagnified.com wasn't registered until May 13th 2014
>Discord registered May 13th 2015 in effect to inquire information about knowledge of algorithm
>the first publicly available instance of the full algorithm I saved on archive.org on October 23rd 2017
>no information publicly available about how widespread the knowledge of the algorithm is and at what points if any it became widespread especially before October 23rd 2017
What went wrong?
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 14:41:27 UTC No. 16148525
All Lee cronin has done is make salad dressing with absurdly expensive robots.
🧵 Conformal Cyclic Cosmology
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 14:26:38 UTC No. 16148503
Is this this big bounce/big crunch/cyclic model true? Does this imply we will live forever but in different ways?
🧵 What does the double slit experiment prove?
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 14:21:36 UTC No. 16148500
Not skeptical. Just wondering.
In my eyes it proves these two things
>"something" is observing
>reality can change its laws based off that observation
🧵 Brainwashing Myself
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 13:46:34 UTC No. 16148461
how do i brainwash myself to be able to control all my neurons consciously?
🧵 Self driving cars when?
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 12:59:04 UTC No. 16148400
It's already 2024 and no self driving cars? What's the holdup?
🧵 Riemann hypothesis - mathfags needed
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 12:27:37 UTC No. 16148367
so, new gpt2 architecture chatbot has been shadowdropped and it's output is significally different from gpt4 in some cases. below is what happens when asked to prove riemann's hypothesis and the overall process is consistent between multiple regens (normal gpt4t proposes a meme solution). can some mathfag look if any of this makes any sense? sorry for broken formulas formatting, that's how gpt2 outputs them (i think you can paste them in latex formula viewer to see them properly):
The Riemann Zeta function, (\zeta(s)), is defined for (\text{Re}(s) > 1) by the absolutely convergent series:
[
\zeta(s) = \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{n^s}
]
and extended to the rest of the complex plane (except (s = 1)) via analytic continuation. The functional equation for (\zeta(s)) is central in its analysis:
[
\zeta(s) = 2^s \pi^{s-1} \sin\left(\frac{\pi s}{2}\right) \Gamma(1-s) \zeta(1-s)
]
The Riemann Hypothesis asserts that all non-trivial zeros of (\zeta(s)) lie on the critical line (\text{Re}(s) = \frac{1}{2}).
🧵 Funding secure
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 09:36:56 UTC No. 16148214
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 09:10:12 UTC No. 16148199
Help me out. I am trying to teach myself to draw and I want to study proper perspective in order to do it.
I'm having trouble trying to rotate a cube by its axis. By drawing the elipse at the base I have an Idea where should the 45° angle of the corner lie (blue line), but I don't know how to figure out where to cut it so the figure keeps the same size but in perspective. Anyone has an idea how to do it? I tried reading some book called "Viewpoints" but it was garbage that didn't explain shit, to be solved in a classroom as part of a course.
🧵 Day 11 of studying math everyday until I learn calculus
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 08:53:15 UTC No. 16148183
Today: more fractions
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 07:56:11 UTC No. 16148128
Consciousness is the product of some quantum effect
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 07:17:09 UTC No. 16148102
What kind of problems do high-IQ geniuses have?
>inb4; none
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 05:29:59 UTC No. 16148014
What is the scientific explanation behind them always looking like this?
🧵 Human interspecies chimeras
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 04:59:24 UTC No. 16147992
have there been any?
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 04:18:40 UTC No. 16147971
Soience now says basic hygiene is bad for you. Does anyone here trust this latest new soience?
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 03:01:39 UTC No. 16147918
holy BASED! How did Tesla even bros?
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 03:01:33 UTC No. 16147917
Is there a big record of fossils somewhere? I'm sick of evolutioniggers hiding behind muh study muh appeal to authority whenever I ask anything. I want to consume all known possible fossil discoveries into a database from which I can datamine a d find actual information and not just some religious mantra by I le hecking love soience retard
🧵 Columbia University
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 02:08:40 UTC No. 16147876
What are people's opinions on Columbia University and how it became completely free of Jews which is something the redneck hicks who call themselves antisemitic could have done in their southern trump loving colleges but they didn't. Instead a university in Jew York pressured by liberals was the first to clear itself of Jews.
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 02:05:52 UTC No. 16147869
In "General Test Percentage Distribution of Scores Within Intended Graduate Major Field Based on Seniors and Nonenrolled College Graduates". Why are those in MicroComputer Applications major so smart?
The sample is only 85, so it might be some sort of random effect, but 20% of them score in the highest category for quantitative. How? They have a higher percentage in this than economists, nearly all engineers, all of the chemists, those in optics, computer science, and have as many in this category as astrophysicists. They trump nearly absolutely anyone in terms of the percentage of them in the highest quantitative category.
How can people majoring in knowing how to use Excel at a basic level be the gods of maths?!
The explanation seems that maybe it's the fact their sample is only 85, but 27 intended majors have a smaller sample than that and don't show any such wild luck. Honestly, I'm baffled.
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 01:58:49 UTC No. 16147861
Ultimately, if _IF_ global warming is made up (and this is obviously very unscientific—an unscientific opinion, if you will, which is a tautology—inversely, a scientific opinion would be an oxymoron) and thus realpolitik, but at least not the myopic left/right politics of the day. The only way this could be is to catalyze the general public into weaning itself off an energy source that endangers its own safety, as has been demonstrably seen during the energy crises of the 1970s. It is not ethical to dupe the public. Sure. But is it still so bad if it is being done for their own good, because they are too dumb to do it on their own? Are they not hurting themselves by trying to thwart efforts to modernize energy? This is a rhetorical question, by the way.
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 01:50:09 UTC No. 16147841
Stochastic means random
that's it
i just solved half of your "math" problems
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 01:48:00 UTC No. 16147838
What kinds of genes are currently being selected for in humanity? I notice that none of the educated professionals in their mid-30s around me have more than 1 child. From surveys, the more educated and higher income have less kids. The poorest and less educated have the most kids. Religious groups have a lot of kids, my neighbors growing up were some weird Christian sect and they had 11 kids. The most technologically advanced people, Japanese and South Koreans are having no kids and their population will collapse soon.
I'm evolutionary terms what's happening to the species?
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 01:01:24 UTC No. 16147772
Give me evidence of something existing without a cause.
🧵 /sfg/ - Spaceflight General
Anonymous at Fri, 26 Apr 2024 23:55:49 UTC No. 16147648
Prop Transfer Demo Edition
Previous - >>16144982