Image not available

600x400

IMG_4003.png

🗑️ 🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16097760

I GOT RITALIN
Maybe I can still save this semester


Image not available

1080x904

Screenshot_202403....png

🧵 Solar storm

Anonymous No. 16097753

Will our phones blow up in our hands and light us ablaze?


Image not available

600x730

119ab65bebbd.jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16097747

If human pheromones are not a thing then how do you explain pictured?


Image not available

1600x900

baltimore.jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16097674

The absolute state of American engineering


Image not available

720x804

v.png

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16097665

Just build a solar far-ACK!
https://twitter.com/roughneck2real/status/1772339177264148491


Image not available

1024x1012

20240326_144842.jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16097636

Nice to meet you, /sci/. Here's my card.


Image not available

521x508

learning-pyramid2.jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16097588

The inability to learn and comprehend something isn't always based on intelligence but could also be based on other factors as well. If you think it's impossible to learn and understand something then picture this scenario: If you were locked in a room for the rest of your life where you had nothing to do but learn the most complex mathematical subjects, where you had access to the best sources of tutors, videos, etc. with the perfect plan that fits your learning style, would you eventually learn these mathematical concepts? If the answer is yes, then the only question is how long it will take you learn these concepts. If the answer is no, then that implies it's impossible to learn and there is something beyond your control that prevents you from learning.

So my point is if you ever think you're incapable of learning and understanding something, picture yourself in that scenario. I've at least learned that the best forms of learning is where I'm forced to do something such as practicing solving problems, whereas reading and lectures only help a little bit.


Image not available

567x437

1693579305372524.jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

B4rk0n No. 16097541

What's normal scientifically?


Image not available

2450x1902

Screenshot 2024-0....png

🧵 CVs

Anonymous No. 16097531

Share, rate and hate. Remember to redact personally identifiable info.


Image not available

459x762

1711431476872378.png

🗑️ 🧵 Another big win for the environment thanks to greentards

Anonymous No. 16097454

Your "green energy solution" is now thousands of acres of toxic waste due to one hail storm
Nice job greentards


Image not available

872x872

1711445133017.jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16097423

What is the difference between chirality, helicity, polarization, and parity? They all seem to be a change of sign but somehow they are not the same?


Image not available

634x381

1711363472937246.jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16097385

What are the odds that Europa will be in the habitable zone after The Sun goes red giant?


Image not available

294x445

31fwtthdQSL._SY44....jpg

🧵 Electrodynamics Chaichian

Anonymous No. 16097372

I already self studied electromagnetics at the first year level. I want to use either pic related or griffiths text to learn electrodynamics. If you have experience with either texts then i ask how was it learning from them. I want to choose the better one to learn from so i can do as many problems by only using the textbook itself as a resource.


Image not available

941x1021

IMG_0995.jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16097367

Prove me that the climate change is not real, or that if it’s real, it’s not man-made.
Every single time I see someone coming up with “damning evidence” about it, they are actually either manipulating or misinterpreting the data, or it’s an opinion piece by a petroleum shill.
Sure there are flaws in many studies supporting the man-made narrative, but the overall evidence cannot be looked away at in good faith.


Image not available

3072x2170

seamonkies.jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16097326

We're in agreement, right?


Image not available

979x830

SpaceXguy.jpg

🧵 /sfg/ - Spaceflight General

Anonymous No. 16097294

Elon Musk edition

previous >>16094949


Image not available

2048x2048

Firefly frog as b....jpg

🗑️ 🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16097284

how do I into liking math as much as people that do it recreationally for basically no reason. Sometimes its fun but its still a chore. Much like how I prefer to do the dishes over the laundry, I don't really want to do either


Image not available

300x168

download (2).jpg

🧵 using software to forecast winning lottery numbers

Anonymous No. 16097240

is it possible to write a program that could predict winning numbers for the lottery?


Image not available

1030x752

chrome_CnHUfDzQ1t.png

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16097221

Olivia from IBM quantum: my quantum qt waifu


Image not available

480x640

56DA4735-024E-4C0....jpg

🧵 The Mikado

Anonymous No. 16097215

In the 1885 comic opera ‘The Mikado’, the character the grand Poo-bah says “I can trace my ancestry to a protoplasmal primordial atomic globule.”.
Although I do not believe in Evolution. I am still curious about whether the Theory of Evolution progressed to include microorganisms as a common ancestor as of the year 1885. Did it?


Image not available

3250x4333

Albert_Einstein_H....jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16097127

The speed of light is constant across references frames
It just is bro.
That's why they call it c for constant. Stop asking so many questions.


Image not available

702x800

6762274B-28E4-4ED....jpg

🧵 The face of science

Anonymous No. 16097061

60 Minutes invited Science on to talk about society not having enough censorship.

No wonder you all froth at the mouth whenever someone mentions physiognomy. Arr rook same!


Image not available

1177x1189

c.jpg

🧵 can you solve multivariable equations?

Anonymous No. 16097024

my brother claims x + y = 5 is solvable because y = 5 - x and can be graphed appropriately. i claim that you cannot solve it because of the way science works, if you have multiple variables you cannot acertain whats causing what, which from a data standpoint. I suppose his stance is basic algebra, but idk. who is right?


Image not available

842x1000

1681745665131115.png

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16097013

what's a good psychology 101 textbook?
like halliday's fundamentals of physics or chemistry the central science but for psychology
is pic related good?