Image not available

440x543

IMG_7276.jpg

🧵 Intuitive infinitesimal calculus book

Anonymous No. 16206361

What are your thoughts on this book? It’s short but seems comprehensive at first glance.

https://intellectualmathematics.com/dl/calculus.pdf

The other alternative is the free book by Keisler but that one is 1000 pages.


Image not available

474x423

OIP.jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16206356

What's your favorite Chromosome? For me it's 15


Image not available

1500x1000

What-Is-a-Desiccant.png

🧵 Drying a material

Anonymous No. 16206346

Ok so, stupid question but I want to be sure here.

If you have something in a sealed container with a molecular sieve and a humidity sensor, and the sensor is slowly dropping the material IS getting dryer right?

If something is in a sealed container with a desiccant and the humidity in the air is lower than the moisture content of the material, it will lose moisture, right?


Image not available

418x277

pie.png

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16206335

Can anyone help me calculate the probability of these words?


Image not available

593x487

fauci.jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16206324

This must be embarrassing for the people on this board who thought they were smart and "following the science." Turns out you are a retard just like the "schizos" said you were


Image not available

800x800

Mars+1-2446426262.jpg

🧵 Fuck Mars

Anonymous No. 16206216

Honestly, fuck this planet. Why would anyone want to go here? Why are people deluded enough to think that we could ever live or establish a colony on this dusty rock?

Nothing but rocks and sand, I hope you can make everything you need out of metal, ceramic and glass and don't need silly frivolities like rubber or plastic to, for example, insulate electrical wires. No you can't just shit in the dead martian dust and grow potatoes, that's bullshit, you need a functioning biosphere to grow plants, and even if you could grow something the cosmic radiation will fuck them up because of Mars' piss weak magnetic.

We'd need Star Trek levels of replicator technology to live on Mars. If you have sufficient technology to live on Mars you have sufficient technology to live indefinitely in space, or on Earth itself after fucking it up.

Fuck Mars


Image not available

828x1792

IMG_0235.png

🧵 Why are people here smarter than Reddit sci

Anonymous No. 16206151

Even though most of you are idiots there is still more intelligent discussions then Reddit. Why?


Image not available

500x743

439343572_4458720....jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16206142

So, how do we stop old age?
I'm thinking nanomachines


Image not available

2048x2048

2015_epic_earthmo....jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16206103

If the Big Bang created the universe, and the universe is expanding, then what is the area that the universe is expanding into? Sound like the universe is finite, and this area is infinite and was there before the Big Bang.


Image not available

1230x976

australia.jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16206065

What if Australia was Earth's other moon before its orbit decayed?


Image not available

640x557

_91408619_55df76d....jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16206025

how can one improve in solving algorithmic problems on platforms like leetcode or codeforces at least up to the at least the "expert" rank?
is any specific iq required for that?


Image not available

500x511

1687526628321141.jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16205960

Hello /sci/. I kindly request your best resources on the science of physiognomy.
I noticed that very often facial features allow me to predict with high accuracy the political and moral orientation of a person. E.g. there seem to be distinct facial features immediately justifying a classification of a person as for example a BBC slut, a violent psychopath or a soiboi. I would like to make this classification more complete and more scientifically rigorous. Currently I'm lacking the necessary vocabulary to describe facial features though. Please share your best texts on the topic.
Thanks in advance.


Image not available

1429x1268

IMG_0138.jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16205952

Is her take on Portals tight, /sci/? Or is it all just thick nonsense?


Image not available

825x893

1717056491220668.jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16205892

https://youtu.be/kkvxuqqRBOw?si=wouPbpaOLxe8GTX-

is this guy a retard or not

a lot of studies say that finasteride/dht blockers/5ar inhibitors can cause anxiety/depression persisting even after cessation, but this guy is a hardcore shill and i cant tell if hes right or just a schizo

pic unrelated


Image not available

935x526

swallows.jpg

🧵 dumb mindless creatures

Anonymous No. 16205889

THIS bird produces no other sound except unintelligible screech which remains always the same, there is no variation

All other vocal birds at least have bird song with weird stops and small alterations.

Who knows, a Great Tit might actually be communicating like this: 00011100, 0110110

Not so with swallow

He just literally screams to death any insect nearby and then picks it up as a food

What is the scientific basis on NOT having a varied bird song


Image not available

759x746

HA.jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16205861

Is it climate change?


Image not available

689x901

GOcyzPZWoAAaytv.png

🧵 Computers can not think

Anonymous No. 16205844

Computers don't actually perform linear algebra because linear algebra is a concept invented by mathematicians to describe certain patterns common to various algebraic theories of space. The people constantly trying to attribute human properties to machines consistently make category and ontology errors that they're not aware of until someone points it out for them. Computers can not think, computers execute programmed instructions and it's important to keep this in mind when discussing AI because it is fundamentally just software.


Image not available

482x464

Screenshot 2024-0....png

🧵 I just earned a 4 year degree in Biology. Now what?

Anonymous No. 16205816

What the hell am I supposed to do now? My degree is in biology with an emphasis in physiology/neuroscience. I have no interest in pursuing a higher degree in this. What the hell can I do with what is essentially a biology degree that's "prep" work for medical school when I have no desire to attend medical school?


Image not available

1200x575

3059930659579.jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16205794

Where are all the Aliens !?


Image not available

750x555

comewithme.png

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16205776

I know how to build human level AGI right now, with today's technology.

The costs exceed $100 mil, but are below $200 mil

Is there any chance I could get this funded, if I'm just some nobody? (Hypothetically, let's say I'm correct, and my method really does work, how can I get someone to backcheck it, to make sure it is legitimately a good attempt/design. Without them stealing the idea? I don't want to openly patent it, because then any country can swoop in and build it.)


Image not available

196x257

IMG_4504.jpg

🧵 Brain training methods

Anonymous No. 16205764

What do u guys think of brain training methods (intelligence boosting) and iq testing in general I have been brain training and using nootropics to enchance my cognitive abilities on this discord server https://discord.gg/cognition it really helped me alot


Image not available

1648x1545

IMG_3077.jpg

🗑️ 🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16205755

Ironically, when did you learn 1+1>2+2


Image not available

1568x3617

the science says….png

🗑️ 🧵 Science links liberal beliefs to psychotic traits

Anonymous No. 16205745

Science says liberals, not conservatives, are psychotic
https://nypost.com/2016/06/09/science-says-liberal-beliefs-are-linked-to-pyschotic-traits/
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/ajps.12216

Turns out liberals are the real authoritarians.

A political-science journal that published an oft-cited study claiming conservatives were more likely to show traits associated with “psychoticism” now says it got it wrong. Very wrong.

The American Journal of Political Science published a correction this year saying that the 2012 paper has “an error” — and that liberal political beliefs, not conservative ones, are actually linked to psychoticism.

“The interpretation of the coding of the political attitude items in the descriptive and preliminary analyses portion of the manuscript was exactly reversed,” the journal said in the startling correction.

“The descriptive analyses report that those higher in Eysenck’s psychoticism are more conservative, but they are actually more liberal; and where the original manuscript reports those higher in neuroticism and social desirability are more liberal, they are, in fact, more conservative.”

In the paper, psychoticism is associated with traits such as tough-mindedness, risk-taking, sensation-seeking, impulsivity and authoritarianism.


Image not available

1200x836

Flat_Earth_illust....jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16205734

I want to dive deep into the flat earth theory. I want to get James Jones deep. I don't want those nuts that cant articulate.