🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 22:51:10 UTC No. 16266799
Have you ever made it far in a math competition?
🧵 Metal-Free Cell!!!
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 21:38:47 UTC No. 16266678
https://x.com/live_munro/status/180
Battery without any metal, no copper, no nickle, no aluminum, no metals. Stackable for extreme efficiency
🧵 Is this a decent book for studying calculus?
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 21:28:28 UTC No. 16266658
Knew some calculus a while ago but haven't used it in a bit and wanted to start from the ground up and learn it more thoroughly. Pic related is the book I physically have to hand. Don't know much about it but have heard mixed things. Anyone used it? Should I bother with it or just try one of the better regarded calculus textbooks?
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 21:21:04 UTC No. 16266645
When did people stop thinking about space exploration?
🗑️ 🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 21:07:01 UTC No. 16266621
Which sub-discipline of math or physics should I pursue to create the greatest amount of chud seethe?
Shalom.
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 20:48:34 UTC No. 16266584
any /sci/ recs on a book that provides gist on most of the sub-fields of higher math? analytic number theory, differential geometry, ergodic theory, lie theory, galois theory, etc. (to pluck some random names from tao's blog & elsewhere)? obviously not to learn the fields but to get a general feel for what they're about. I feel that a book would provide a more coherent picture of higher math for the laychad than some disjointed exercise in "type each field into google, then read"
t. been thru calc I & II, linear alg, and elementary number theory as a compsci fag, so don't need one of the many overly broad & basic books that introduces only such things with some abstract algebra and statistics thrown in. I have no problem finding such books.
🧵 abbreeding and inbreeding
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 20:44:28 UTC No. 16266573
What are the pros and cons of low genetic diversity and high genetic diversity?
From what I've been seeing [1] the popular assumption that inbreeding always results in abominations is inaccurate.
The popular assumption of abbreeding is that at a certain point it will be impossible to breed but does that actually affect our societies.
It could also be considered taboo to reach either extreme not because there is any real risk but that it is gluttonous.
Based on how the wind kisses my balls when I stand naked on the beach I conjecture inbreeding is advantageous for women and abbreeding is advantageous for men.
With this invariable truth established widespread literacy expanding the potential range for breeding [2] gives men an unprecedented advantage and hoes madd.
[1] besides your mom in a recreationally sexual context
[2] this correlation between literacy and expanded breeding range has been established from data found on a Burger King wrapper in a trashcan near Drexel University.
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 20:33:23 UTC No. 16266541
>quantum information teleports instantly and violates both causality and relativity
how is this any different than saying "God made it happen"?
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 20:15:52 UTC No. 16266511
Say what you want, peak /sci/ has been achieved.
This is all the good stuff in one tight package.
Period.
🧵 Meteors
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 20:03:55 UTC No. 16266495
Scientifically speaking, what are the odds of such an extinction event by meteor impact happening again? NASA does not yet seem to be able to protect us from that
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 19:54:04 UTC No. 16266482
Is there a more unnecessarily hideous and dishonest equation in all of mathematics?
> Terrible canonical representation for a basis vector on a surface
> Disgusting curried notation for what is in essence a dot product (the whole idea of a functional is cringe and reddit)
> Mutilates Leibniz's original notation and offers no geometric insight. Also acts as a bastardized form of Grassman's work. Patently inferior to Clifford Algebra
> Works axiomatically, but only because the pieces were set up long after the fact. Because of this is mindlessly slurped up by graduate students who don't think and just repeat proofs.
For me it's the definition of a differential form, the anti-Euler equation. It's a slick but useless piece of computation and a complete cancer on the field. Is there any other equation that represents so much mathematical malpractice in such a condensed form?
🧵 The Moon Landing
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 19:48:14 UTC No. 16266474
Let's settle it: did we go to the moon? I doubt it and I think Terrence Howard's argument on NASA's current massive struggle to go "back" to the moon only proves this
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 19:19:27 UTC No. 16266414
Why do people think spamming the word "quantum" over and over is how you win a debate? First off there's no consensus on how to interpret quantum mechanics. Not even close. No sorry but neither the question of determinacy or indeterminacy has been settled.
🗑️ 🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 18:54:20 UTC No. 16266373
>We found that 73.9% of deaths were directly due to or significantly contributed to by COVID-19 vaccination.
A new review of 44 papers that contained 325 autopsy cases. Can this be debunked?
https://www.sciencedirect.com/scien
🗑️ 🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 18:51:09 UTC No. 16266366
Is math discovered or invented? Are these numbers and equations really just "floating" somewhere on their own in some realm whether or not humans discover them or not? Why stop at numbers. Is the idea/potential of "dogness" floating around somewhere as well regardless of whether or not dogs exist?
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 18:14:37 UTC No. 16266323
There's literally no point to doing science after the 60s , all that was left was for manufacturing and engineering to catch up to the theoretical frameworks.
There's nothing new under the sun, we're just publishing more and more bullshit.
This is very important because if we finally realize that technology is dead and there's no more progress to be had we can conclude that corporations and silicon valley are stealing our money with R&D and contrived bullshit.
🗑️ 🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 17:53:19 UTC No. 16266295
How much do fireworks contribute to global warming?
🧵 Probability and math use
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 17:26:44 UTC No. 16266249
What are some good books/methods to learn to use probability/math daily as a retard? I want to learn to apply formulas and break down big problems into math problems, I only use basic geometry and addition like other math noobs.
🧵 Quantum fakery
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 17:23:46 UTC No. 16266245
Sorry anons there will never be a quantum computer.
Quantum physics is fake don’t you see?
If Sokal can publish a convincing paper full of jargon that passes peer review what does this say about your beloved theory?
🧵 was octopus the ancestor of humans
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 17:03:37 UTC No. 16266199
consider this: there is confirmed 550 million year old octopus fossil found from the bottom of the sea
octopus looks like a human more so than it looks like an insect
octopus evolved from sea-snail, which is essentially an evolved worm
this is how it might have happened
1. snail evolves 700 million years ago from somekind of original worm
2. snail suddenly grows eyes on stalks and grows a few tentacles on its face
3. snail evolves a calcium shell for its use, on its back
4. snails move to live on land about 450 million years ago when very few others have yet dared to make a trip, this is a dead end and land snails never evolve further but stay the same
5. another branch of snails turned into octopus roughly 100 million years before the landing, due to octopus features they are incapable of living on land despite being more advanced in a number of ways, than a snail
6. yet another branch of snails turns into the first fish, this happened also 550 million years ago
>snails turned into fish by freak mutation: their calcium shell genes went inside the worm instead of outside and they grew an inner skeleton instead of outer hard shell
>proofs? you want proofs?
consider that fish skeleton is made from same calcium material as is snail and octopus like shells, meanwhile insect hard shells are completely different for they dont contain calcium, they are made from proteine called chitin
🧵 Birth control pills
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 16:58:48 UTC No. 16266185
Know a girl who started birth control at 15- and was on them for 5 years , as recommended by a doctor.
>what are the long term effects of this. Any mental or physical damage?
🧵 young deaths after corona vaccine
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 16:19:00 UTC No. 16266149
16 year old boy in New Zealand:
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/devas
17 year old chinese sports player:
https://economictimes.indiatimes.co
Manpreet Kaur, died on airplane to Dubai:
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com
ABC News chief, 56 year old woman, died:
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/n
33 year old female race car driver, dead:
https://autos.yahoo.com/lizzy-musi-
Healthy 18 year old girl, dead:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/ot
🧵 STEM cell research retracted, highest ever cited retracted work. Longevity morons btfo.
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 15:48:07 UTC No. 16266103
Hey longevity trannies, antiaging research is fake and gay. You will die alone and pathetically just like all of us. Stop spamming this board with your useless scam science to shill for your web traffic. Buy an ad.
Also:
>The junior author of the retracted paper get the blame for the doctored images that they didnt make
Kek. Worms in the institutions almost guarantee that any future results come out most likely is not significant and not replicated because they're performed by fraudsters. You will not reach the escape velocity. Bahahahaha, fags.
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 15:35:18 UTC No. 16266086
science can't explain introversion. it just makes no evolutionary sense