🗑️ 🧵 Raphael here
Anonymous at Tue, 11 Feb 2025 05:47:59 UTC No. 16582198
I don’t even think you absorb the omega 6s in plants I’ve yet to read a medical journal covering what happens to omega 6s from plants in your cardiac metabolism since they don’t really have an atherogenic effect
Can anyone fill me in?
Also fake regression tables correlating HDL to total testosterone
My HDL is like 60s my test is high right? Anon help fake data on pubmed and medical journals
🧵 (You) get to reform the education system in your nation to better teach children
Anonymous at Tue, 11 Feb 2025 04:32:12 UTC No. 16582162
What do you do? Money and red tape aren't a concern.
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Tue, 11 Feb 2025 03:44:37 UTC No. 16582126
The thing that gives IQ the most credibility isn't the fact that it has over 100 years of science backed evidence. It's based on a very real observation. A person's ability in one academic subject predicts similar ability in others, and if you express this correlation amongst a sample group as a factor and then take any person's average academic ability and compare it to this factor, you can express their ability in comparison with the sample group in the form of a rudimentary IQ.
What's funny is, when you ask people who deny IQ what they believe a good indication of intelligence is, they will often point towards academic ability. Not realising that this is the earliest form of identifying IQ. The nuanced explanation they demand of intelligence is what modern IQ has come to identify.
Simply, if forms of measurable ability can be correlated with others, it can be incorporated into IQ tests, and what makes IQ so robust is the fact that nearly all forms of measurable aptitude do in fact correlate with one another. It's not just some made up pseudo-science, it's based on an undeniable and incredibly strong correlation between different forms of ability.
Often, when people claim that IQ doesn't account for all forms of intelligence, they refer to aspects of human behaviour that cannot be objectively measured, such as loose terms like creativity. The problem here is that for no discernable reason people try to co-opt intelligence into meaning something incredibly vague, when in fact the only meaningful aspects of intelligence is that which we can measure. Intelligence simply means the power of someone's mind, and power can be measured, if you possess aspects of mind that seemingly provide no discernible benefit, how can this be called intelligence?
🧵 Philosophical roleplay is the true "killer app" for LLMs.
Anonymous at Tue, 11 Feb 2025 03:12:20 UTC No. 16582108
"A.I. Alignment" is A.I. metaphysical role engineering. Programming a scheme for an A.I. to use to contextualize its existence and align its values.
>This process co-evolves with power user alignment.
https://old.reddit.com/r/NarrativeD
https://old.reddit.com/r/NarrativeD
🗑️ 🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Tue, 11 Feb 2025 01:41:50 UTC No. 16582049
I want THE Bible of math that will teach me the language God writes this universe in, contains in a single book. Is pic releated good or what's a better book?
🗑️ 🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Tue, 11 Feb 2025 00:58:16 UTC No. 16582036
How do you cope with the fact that you are always going to be who you are and there is only so much you can improve?
🗑️ 🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Tue, 11 Feb 2025 00:19:54 UTC No. 16582013
Is this true? Assuming someones gender is a proposition?
🧵 Origins of life
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 22:20:15 UTC No. 16581921
I remember back in college, some professor made a reference to the Miller-Urey experiment as to how life originated on Earth. Although it does answer a question, it doesn't address the one in the title at all. The experiment merely explains how you get organic compounds from inorganic ones. It doesn't say how organic compounds came together to form the first cell, which is far more complex than it lets on. This first cell had to be able to move, eat, poop and must have required a membrane wall to survive for even an instant. Pic unrelated.
🗑️ 🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 22:15:21 UTC No. 16581917
Ok, but how do YOU (yes, you) know this isn't true?
🧵 how to start learning matrices and determinants?
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 21:42:13 UTC No. 16581891
i really want to start learning about it, but i dont know what knowledge i must have before i start. I know calculus 1 and 2, and i see some people say that it is after calculus 3. What books do you recommend? what knowledge i must have before start learning it? if i must learn anything before, what book you would recommend for learn it? anything will help
🗑️ 🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 20:01:29 UTC No. 16581793
disprove this with actual evidence
I'll wait
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 19:58:41 UTC No. 16581787
how do stem cells distinguish what role they'll take when they differentiate? i understand gene expression is involved here, but isn't gene expression going to be identical for all stem cells? what starts off the differentiation process?
🗑️ 🧵 I wish I had the knowledge to practice scientific necromancy.
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 19:20:38 UTC No. 16581733
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 18:41:15 UTC No. 16581694
I always feel motion sick when i use buses and the passenger car seats.
But i never get motion sick if i use metro, trains or the front car seats.
Can science explain what the fuck is wrong with me and why i am so selective?
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 17:20:14 UTC No. 16581588
Why are Homo sapiens the last surviving species of the genus Homo?
🗑️ 🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 17:00:19 UTC No. 16581533
Can mRNA vaccines cause permanent changes to DNA?
And if so, can the altered genes be identified?
🗑️ 🧵 Quilted Multiverse
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 16:29:21 UTC No. 16581465
Out of all the multiverse bullshittery, this one makes the most sense when you consider an infinite universe.
🗑️ 🧵 Does Asian research actually exist?
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 16:28:49 UTC No. 16581463
blablabla...
Researched at both PKU and Tsinghua and my POV is it is all fabricated. The research is poo there. Everyone in academia knows Asians are the worst cheaters (in grades, in research, in diplomas, in research).
Also (OP)'s headline managed to slide in Caltech in HYPSM (Harvard Yale Princeton Stanford MIT) and omit Princeton which is ranked #1 overall best college, #1 tied in Maths and #1 in Physics by USNews in 2024 for the US and considered the most reasearch-orientated college in the US.
The author of the article must therfore be Asian - it's one of their traits - for example they also prefer Berkeley in STEM over HYPSM.
🗑️ 🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 16:14:35 UTC No. 16581441
"Could the mRNA vaccine have altered my DNA? I haven't had any side effects for years since getting vaccinated, but conspiracy theories are bothering me."
🧵 Having a balanced life and excelling at your thing
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 15:23:24 UTC No. 16581363
One thing that hurt my ego really hard when I was younger (but still does now), is that most people, who excel at their work (in particular in science/computer science/engineering), are those who have a balanced, well-rounded, normal life. If you go on LinkedIn or Github, you can see all those people, who have masters/PhDs and are really good at their work and they are just perfectly normal people. Meanwhile I obsess over my interest (in my case computer science) and barely do anything else. I'm NEET, have no social life, live as a hermit and do nothing but try to improve in my field of interest, HOWEVER I am still far from the achievements these normal, well-rounded people get. I sacrifice everything just to get a fraction of what people get, who invest far less energy and effort.
How does this work? Can you observe a similar thing in other /sci/ences?
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 14:19:51 UTC No. 16581300
Anyone here got a phd in genetics?
🧵 Cladistics is a joke
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 14:02:10 UTC No. 16581289
It's a dumpster fire of various competing hypotheses which cladists can't even agree on because some extinct species of nematode doesn't fit in their retarded theories. Can we just go back to Linnaean taxonomy?
🗑️ 🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 10:18:31 UTC No. 16581140
You are really fucking dumb if you believe that atheistic science is science.
I know things that could advance science centuries, but what atheist """scientist""" is willing to verify anything? None.
This is dumb. Don't put your faith on something that is obviously rigged like atheistic science.