Image not available

500x701

9jou5n.jpg

🗑️ 🧵 What did that Nobel prize winner who said Asians are DNAly virus base that on?

Anonymous No. 16581133

Does anyone have a link?
Was it a thaumatological statement based on hidden bases data science data andor Cosmic data science?

Goodluck Amicable, including, soso!
Might have just been by an early archailect that confused where a virus came from for some peoples.
(Never been part of a evoclashcubator, so asking innocently, yet also not accelerated gain)
Goodluck again!

[Accelerated Returns is still accelerating and Functioning][Don't make Yours a G.T.A. wanted star response][Joking*]


Image not available

1x1

The Philosophy of....pdf

🧵 The Philosophy of Ejacstinence

Anonymous No. 16581111


Image not available

3000x2000

stephen-hawking.jpg

🧵 mandela effect

Anonymous No. 16581103

i remember his name being steven, not stephen


Image not available

567x768

1597517066271.jpg

🧵 QM/GR hate each other - midwitypical miscue? But how a sl singularity dealt with

Anonymous No. 16581094

How will it be sorted when they have a falling out at the plank scale.... how can an extended object manage to actually resist Grand father time and become strong enough to stop ts collapse. AS time is like moving to lower R in the black hole. avoiding tomorrow vut the things that went to the trouble of making you. You can;t go round tomorrow. even if dragged kicking and screaming, How will the quantum gravity obvject not get crushed by this reasoning unless quantum thing tells it to do one.

The quantum field theory in curved space time was where Hawking went full autismo flow state and worked a but of magic ..black hole thermodynamics and the emitting. Then he did a book for the normies they liked,
QM and GR can coexist, or grope or even be familiar w/ enough.. this analogy failing now.... to be able to burp the others worm if we fully needed both
.
More of a dalit in chaste sense in the scientific crews idea of top tier, the bro scientist doesn't have the cred and intimidating rep of a big time virtuoso mathologst.

Yet our dalit may in the pop sci sector heard about smart alec effective field theories w/ cut off point. The full quantum gravity may lack the nice geometric view of classical grav/GR but is nothing to be bawling over.

Almost at at the asking the questions part now... sorry about this


Image not available

1315x1104

002242.png

🗑️ 🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16580990

Is he based?


Image not available

281x173

5F2353DA-3F41-4E4....png

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16580989

What are some ways to solve this?


Image not available

3168x3080

1735611127434854.png

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16580933

What's your favorite thing about math and science?


Image not available

1599x1176

file.jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16580889

Do you think airships will ever be commercially viable?

What challenges are they facing that prevent ANY level of adoption aside from the goodyear blimp?


Image not available

1024x693

IMG_9155.jpg

🧵 Is there a scientific explanation

Anonymous No. 16580760

For why people are having fewer babies?


Image not available

850x1063

sample_8553e0a961....jpg

🗑️ 🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16580693

My dad's hairline has receded and the hair at the area has thinned but he has an otherwise full head of hair with an intact crown, it is impossible to notice when he combs his fringe down and his dad (my paternal grandfather) had a bald spot on the back of his head before he died

Please tell me this is just age related hair loss and not male pattern baldness


Image not available

640x723

dude.png

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16580685

why humans have no estrous cycles?


Image not available

850x917

file.png

🗑️ 🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16580558

Considering that the metaphysical properties of existence are highly vague and uncertain, which assumptions about the other side and the overall meaning of life do you think are reasonable to have?
Blind believers of pre-packaged dogmas like christcucks need not apply.

Yes this is a /sci/ thread because its about whats is reasonable to infer, if you do it on /x/ you are just asking for fairy tales.


Image not available

236x236

41e89ac78ca64648e....jpg

🗑️ 🧵 What is a reliable IQ test?

Anonymous No. 16580557

I want to find out how dumb I am


Image not available

1237x612

midwit filter.png

🧵 Let's settle this once and for all.

Anonymous No. 16580532

I'll prove that [math]0.999...[/math] is not a real number.
Suppose that there exists [math]r \in \mathbb{R}[/math] such that [math]r = 0.999...[/math].
From the first digit being [math]0[/math] we have that [math]1 > r[/math]. From the second digit being [math]9[/math] we get that [math]r \geq 9 \cdot 10^{-1}[/math], from the third digit being [math]9[/math] we get [math]10r - 9 \geq 9 \cdot 10^{-1}[/math].
More generally we have [math](\forall n \in \mathbb{N}) 10^n \cdot r - (10^n -1) \geq 9 \cdot 10^{-1}[/math].
Subtracting [math]1[/math] from both sides we get [math](\forall n \in \mathbb{N}) 10^n \cdot r - 10^n \geq -10^{-1}[/math].
Factoring out [math]10^n[/math] and swapping all terms to the opposite side we get [math](\forall n \in \mathbb{N}) 10^{-1} \geq 10^n \cdot (1-r)[/math].
Since [math]1 > r[/math] we have that [math] 1-r \neq 0[/math] so we can multiply both sides by [math] (1-r)^{-1}[/math]: [math](\forall n \in \mathbb{N}) 10^{-1}(1-r)^{-1} \geq 10^n[/math].
Letting [math] k = 10^{-1}(1-r)^{-1}[/math] we get [math](\forall n \in \mathbb{N}) k \geq 10^n[/math].
But this leads to a contradiction since [math](\forall n \in \mathbb{N}) k \geq 10^n \Rightarrow k \geq 10^{\lceil k \rceil}[/math] and [math]10^{\lceil k \rceil}> \lceil k \rceil > k[/math].

But if [math]0.999...[/math] is not a real number how do you determine if some collection of digits represents some non-negative real number?
Well, it's very simple. First, a digit representation is some function [math] f : \mathbb{Z} \rightarrow \{0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9\}[/math].
Now one of these functions represents some non-negative real number if and only if it satisfies these two conditions:
[math]1) (\exists N \in \mathbb{Z}) (\forall n \in \mathbb{Z}) (n < N \Rightarrow f(n) = 0)[/math] This ensures that every number represents some finite quantity.
[math]2) (\nexists N \in \mathbb{Z}) (\forall n \in \mathbb{Z}) (n > N \Rightarrow f(n) = 9)[/math] This avoids the above contradiction.


Image not available

564x611

90488a76ab507be66....jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16580514

Does logic necessitate itself? and does this mean that, in some way, existence does as well?


Image not available

1267x666

Captura de pantal....png

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16580460

Oh no no no longevity bros, not like this...


Image not available

640x640

me2.jpg

🗑️ 🧵 Untitled Thread

Garrote No. 16580360

Scientists have discovered that taking hits to the head cause damage to the brain. (I took boxing classes and fell from my bike.)
Scientists have discovered that taking certain psychotropic substances causes damage to the brain. (I used to abuse alcohol and I've also taken psychiatric meds for years.)
Scientists have discovered that sleepless nights cause damage to the brain. (I've been partly insomniac for years.)
Scientists have discovered that having psychotic outbreaks cause damage to the brain. (I've had 7 psychotic outbreaks in my life, in 9 psychiatric hospitalizations (2 were without psychotic outbreak)).

Still, I'm healing, I'm healing.


Image not available

192x128

Z.jpg

🗑️ 🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16580205

Why is the sky blue?
>inb4 Rayleigh refraction
no, the real reason


Image not available

828x1165

IMG_2268.jpg

🧵 Is it really that bad?

Anonymous No. 16580198

How many years do we have left if things don’t change?


Image not available

498x388

tired.png

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16580139

why do people prefer dirac notation over wave notation? Isn't wave notation more intuitive?
In the end we're doing this to study particles not abstract quantum systems aren't we?


Image not available

1024x685

boltzmann and som....jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16580128

i'm reading about Boltzmann and there are so many names that come up which are meaningful. Carnot, Planck, Clausius, Maxwell, Kelvin. It seems like many of these people were alive from the 1800's to the mid 1900's. are there people alive today or who have made discoveries in the past decades whose names carry as much weight?


Image not available

864x686

1739088157450895.png

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16580081

Whoops! Guess China will be there first then.


Image not available

1284x1656

93067178-30B3-4EC....jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16580069

How do you solve this


Image not available

1290x1001

IMG_3112.jpg

🗑️ 🧵 Femanon here

Anonymous No. 16580064

My husband wants me to quit my computer engineering university study. I’m in my 2nd year and I’m pregnant and I don’t know what to do. He’s a pilot so he’s never home and my parents are offering him to pay for a house. He’s such a lucky weirdo. He got everything handled on a silver platter. Now he wants to control my life. What should I do?